Patient's reactions to digital rectal examination of the prostate

OBJECTIVE: In recent years, there has been a rise in the incidence of prostate cancer (PCa), and routine screening for the disease has become a well accepted clinical practice. Even with the recognized benefit of this approach, some men are still reluctant to undergo digital rectal examination (DRE). For this reason, we designed the present study in order to better understand men's reactions about this method of screening. The aim was to identify possible drawbacks that could be overcome to increase DRE. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We randomly selected 269 patients that were enrolled in an institutional PCa screening program. They were first asked to answer a question regarding their preferred position to undergo the examination. Following this step, they answered a questionnaire in which physical and psychological reactions regarding the DRE were presented. Finally, we used a visual analogical scale (VAS) to analyze the perception of pain during DRE. RESULTS: The supine position was preferred for most patients (53.9%). Before DRE, about 59.4% of patients felt that the exam would be acceptable. After DRE, this figure increased to 91.5% (p < 0.001). Mean VAS score during DRE was 1.69 on a scale with a range between 0 and 10 (0 = no pain; 10 = extreme pain). CONCLUSION: Patient expectations about DRE were negative before examination and changed significantly following the exam. Pain during examination was negligible, contrary to the prevalent belief. These two findings must be clearly presented to patients in order to improve PCa screening acceptance.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Furlan,Andre B., Kato,Rafael, Vicentini,Fabio, Cury,Jose, Antunes,Alberto A., Srougi,Miguel
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2008
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382008000500005
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1677-55382008000500005
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1677-553820080005000052008-12-11Patient's reactions to digital rectal examination of the prostateFurlan,Andre B.Kato,RafaelVicentini,FabioCury,JoseAntunes,Alberto A.Srougi,Miguel prostatic neoplasms digital rectal examination diagnosis OBJECTIVE: In recent years, there has been a rise in the incidence of prostate cancer (PCa), and routine screening for the disease has become a well accepted clinical practice. Even with the recognized benefit of this approach, some men are still reluctant to undergo digital rectal examination (DRE). For this reason, we designed the present study in order to better understand men's reactions about this method of screening. The aim was to identify possible drawbacks that could be overcome to increase DRE. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We randomly selected 269 patients that were enrolled in an institutional PCa screening program. They were first asked to answer a question regarding their preferred position to undergo the examination. Following this step, they answered a questionnaire in which physical and psychological reactions regarding the DRE were presented. Finally, we used a visual analogical scale (VAS) to analyze the perception of pain during DRE. RESULTS: The supine position was preferred for most patients (53.9%). Before DRE, about 59.4% of patients felt that the exam would be acceptable. After DRE, this figure increased to 91.5% (p < 0.001). Mean VAS score during DRE was 1.69 on a scale with a range between 0 and 10 (0 = no pain; 10 = extreme pain). CONCLUSION: Patient expectations about DRE were negative before examination and changed significantly following the exam. Pain during examination was negligible, contrary to the prevalent belief. These two findings must be clearly presented to patients in order to improve PCa screening acceptance.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedade Brasileira de UrologiaInternational braz j urol v.34 n.5 20082008-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382008000500005en10.1590/S1677-55382008000500005
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Furlan,Andre B.
Kato,Rafael
Vicentini,Fabio
Cury,Jose
Antunes,Alberto A.
Srougi,Miguel
spellingShingle Furlan,Andre B.
Kato,Rafael
Vicentini,Fabio
Cury,Jose
Antunes,Alberto A.
Srougi,Miguel
Patient's reactions to digital rectal examination of the prostate
author_facet Furlan,Andre B.
Kato,Rafael
Vicentini,Fabio
Cury,Jose
Antunes,Alberto A.
Srougi,Miguel
author_sort Furlan,Andre B.
title Patient's reactions to digital rectal examination of the prostate
title_short Patient's reactions to digital rectal examination of the prostate
title_full Patient's reactions to digital rectal examination of the prostate
title_fullStr Patient's reactions to digital rectal examination of the prostate
title_full_unstemmed Patient's reactions to digital rectal examination of the prostate
title_sort patient's reactions to digital rectal examination of the prostate
description OBJECTIVE: In recent years, there has been a rise in the incidence of prostate cancer (PCa), and routine screening for the disease has become a well accepted clinical practice. Even with the recognized benefit of this approach, some men are still reluctant to undergo digital rectal examination (DRE). For this reason, we designed the present study in order to better understand men's reactions about this method of screening. The aim was to identify possible drawbacks that could be overcome to increase DRE. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We randomly selected 269 patients that were enrolled in an institutional PCa screening program. They were first asked to answer a question regarding their preferred position to undergo the examination. Following this step, they answered a questionnaire in which physical and psychological reactions regarding the DRE were presented. Finally, we used a visual analogical scale (VAS) to analyze the perception of pain during DRE. RESULTS: The supine position was preferred for most patients (53.9%). Before DRE, about 59.4% of patients felt that the exam would be acceptable. After DRE, this figure increased to 91.5% (p < 0.001). Mean VAS score during DRE was 1.69 on a scale with a range between 0 and 10 (0 = no pain; 10 = extreme pain). CONCLUSION: Patient expectations about DRE were negative before examination and changed significantly following the exam. Pain during examination was negligible, contrary to the prevalent belief. These two findings must be clearly presented to patients in order to improve PCa screening acceptance.
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
publishDate 2008
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382008000500005
work_keys_str_mv AT furlanandreb patientsreactionstodigitalrectalexaminationoftheprostate
AT katorafael patientsreactionstodigitalrectalexaminationoftheprostate
AT vicentinifabio patientsreactionstodigitalrectalexaminationoftheprostate
AT curyjose patientsreactionstodigitalrectalexaminationoftheprostate
AT antunesalbertoa patientsreactionstodigitalrectalexaminationoftheprostate
AT srougimiguel patientsreactionstodigitalrectalexaminationoftheprostate
_version_ 1756428030967808000