Preliminary experience with extraperitoneal endoscopic radical prostatectomy through duplication of the open technique

OBJECTIVE: To describe surgical and functional results with extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with duplication of the open technique, from the experience obtained in the treatment of 28 initial cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a 36-month period, we prospectively analyzed 28 patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer undergoing extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. RESULTS: Mean surgical time was 280 min, with mean blood loss of 320 mL. As intraoperative complications, there were 2 rectal lesions repaired with laparoscopic suture in 2 planes. There was no conversion to open surgery. Median hospital stay was 3 days, with return to oral diet in the first post-operative day in patients. As post-operative complications, there were 3 cases of extraperitoneal urinary fistula. Two of these cases were resolved by maintaining a Foley catheter for 21 days, and the other one by late endoscopic reintervention for repositioning the catheter. Five out of 18 previously potent patients evolved with erectile dysfunction. The diagnosis of prostate cancer was confirmed in all patients, with focal positive margin occurring in 3 cases. During a mean follow-up of 18 months, 2 patients presented increased PSA, with no clinical evidence of disease. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is a laborious and difficult procedure, with a long learning curve. Extraperitoneal access is feasible, and it is possible to practically duplicate the principles of open surgery. The present technique can possibly offer advantages in terms of decreased blood loss, preservation of erectile function and prevention of positive margins.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tobias-Machado,M., Lasmar,Marco T. C., Medina,Jimmy J. A., Forseto Jr,Pedro H., Juliano,Roberto V., Wroclawski,Eric R.
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2005
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382005000300006
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1677-55382005000300006
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1677-553820050003000062005-08-19Preliminary experience with extraperitoneal endoscopic radical prostatectomy through duplication of the open techniqueTobias-Machado,M.Lasmar,Marco T. C.Medina,Jimmy J. A.Forseto Jr,Pedro H.Juliano,Roberto V.Wroclawski,Eric R. prostatic neoplasms prostatectomy retroperitoneum endoscopy OBJECTIVE: To describe surgical and functional results with extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with duplication of the open technique, from the experience obtained in the treatment of 28 initial cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a 36-month period, we prospectively analyzed 28 patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer undergoing extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. RESULTS: Mean surgical time was 280 min, with mean blood loss of 320 mL. As intraoperative complications, there were 2 rectal lesions repaired with laparoscopic suture in 2 planes. There was no conversion to open surgery. Median hospital stay was 3 days, with return to oral diet in the first post-operative day in patients. As post-operative complications, there were 3 cases of extraperitoneal urinary fistula. Two of these cases were resolved by maintaining a Foley catheter for 21 days, and the other one by late endoscopic reintervention for repositioning the catheter. Five out of 18 previously potent patients evolved with erectile dysfunction. The diagnosis of prostate cancer was confirmed in all patients, with focal positive margin occurring in 3 cases. During a mean follow-up of 18 months, 2 patients presented increased PSA, with no clinical evidence of disease. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is a laborious and difficult procedure, with a long learning curve. Extraperitoneal access is feasible, and it is possible to practically duplicate the principles of open surgery. The present technique can possibly offer advantages in terms of decreased blood loss, preservation of erectile function and prevention of positive margins.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedade Brasileira de UrologiaInternational braz j urol v.31 n.3 20052005-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382005000300006en10.1590/S1677-55382005000300006
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Tobias-Machado,M.
Lasmar,Marco T. C.
Medina,Jimmy J. A.
Forseto Jr,Pedro H.
Juliano,Roberto V.
Wroclawski,Eric R.
spellingShingle Tobias-Machado,M.
Lasmar,Marco T. C.
Medina,Jimmy J. A.
Forseto Jr,Pedro H.
Juliano,Roberto V.
Wroclawski,Eric R.
Preliminary experience with extraperitoneal endoscopic radical prostatectomy through duplication of the open technique
author_facet Tobias-Machado,M.
Lasmar,Marco T. C.
Medina,Jimmy J. A.
Forseto Jr,Pedro H.
Juliano,Roberto V.
Wroclawski,Eric R.
author_sort Tobias-Machado,M.
title Preliminary experience with extraperitoneal endoscopic radical prostatectomy through duplication of the open technique
title_short Preliminary experience with extraperitoneal endoscopic radical prostatectomy through duplication of the open technique
title_full Preliminary experience with extraperitoneal endoscopic radical prostatectomy through duplication of the open technique
title_fullStr Preliminary experience with extraperitoneal endoscopic radical prostatectomy through duplication of the open technique
title_full_unstemmed Preliminary experience with extraperitoneal endoscopic radical prostatectomy through duplication of the open technique
title_sort preliminary experience with extraperitoneal endoscopic radical prostatectomy through duplication of the open technique
description OBJECTIVE: To describe surgical and functional results with extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with duplication of the open technique, from the experience obtained in the treatment of 28 initial cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a 36-month period, we prospectively analyzed 28 patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer undergoing extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. RESULTS: Mean surgical time was 280 min, with mean blood loss of 320 mL. As intraoperative complications, there were 2 rectal lesions repaired with laparoscopic suture in 2 planes. There was no conversion to open surgery. Median hospital stay was 3 days, with return to oral diet in the first post-operative day in patients. As post-operative complications, there were 3 cases of extraperitoneal urinary fistula. Two of these cases were resolved by maintaining a Foley catheter for 21 days, and the other one by late endoscopic reintervention for repositioning the catheter. Five out of 18 previously potent patients evolved with erectile dysfunction. The diagnosis of prostate cancer was confirmed in all patients, with focal positive margin occurring in 3 cases. During a mean follow-up of 18 months, 2 patients presented increased PSA, with no clinical evidence of disease. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is a laborious and difficult procedure, with a long learning curve. Extraperitoneal access is feasible, and it is possible to practically duplicate the principles of open surgery. The present technique can possibly offer advantages in terms of decreased blood loss, preservation of erectile function and prevention of positive margins.
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
publishDate 2005
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382005000300006
work_keys_str_mv AT tobiasmachadom preliminaryexperiencewithextraperitonealendoscopicradicalprostatectomythroughduplicationoftheopentechnique
AT lasmarmarcotc preliminaryexperiencewithextraperitonealendoscopicradicalprostatectomythroughduplicationoftheopentechnique
AT medinajimmyja preliminaryexperiencewithextraperitonealendoscopicradicalprostatectomythroughduplicationoftheopentechnique
AT forsetojrpedroh preliminaryexperiencewithextraperitonealendoscopicradicalprostatectomythroughduplicationoftheopentechnique
AT julianorobertov preliminaryexperiencewithextraperitonealendoscopicradicalprostatectomythroughduplicationoftheopentechnique
AT wroclawskiericr preliminaryexperiencewithextraperitonealendoscopicradicalprostatectomythroughduplicationoftheopentechnique
_version_ 1756427959155032064