Masticatory performance with different types of rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible

Abstract Aim: To compare the masticatory performance associated with different rehabilitation strategies for patients with edentulous mandibles. Methods: one portion of the test food "Optocal" was provided to groups: Natural Dentition (n = 15), Mandibular Fixed Implant-Supported Prosthesis with Maxillary Fixed Prosthesis (n = 8), Mandibular Fixed Implant-Supported Prosthesis with Maxillary Removable Prosthesis (n = 14), Mandibular Implant-Retained Overdenture with Maxillary Removable Prosthesis (n = 16), and Complete Dentures (n = 16). The portion was collected after 40 chewing strokes, and then passed through a stack of eight sieves with decreasing apertures. Masticatory performance was determined by weighing the portion of food on each sieve. Results: the masticatory performance was: 71.00% for Natural Dentition, 41.57% for Mandibular Fixed Implant-Supported Prosthesis with Maxillary Fixed Prosthesis, 31.44% for Mandibular Fixed Implant-Supported Prosthesis with Maxillary Removable Prosthesis, 27.70% for Mandibular Implant-retained Overdenture, and 14.33% for Complete Dentures. The data were statistically compared using Student's t-test (p < 0.05). Natural Dentition and Complete Denture groups were statistically different from all other groups, with the Natural Dentition and Complete Denture groups exhibiting the highest and lowest masticatory performance values, respectively. Conclusions: Osseointegrated implants improved the masticatory performance of all implant-supported groups compared to the Complete Dentures group.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Neves,Flávio Domingues, Mendes,Francielle Alves, Borges,Tânia de Freitas, Mendonça,Daniela Baccelli Silveira, Prado,Marisa Martins da Silva, Zancopé,Karla
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba - UNICAMP 2015
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-32252015000300186
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1677-32252015000300186
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1677-322520150003001862015-12-16Masticatory performance with different types of rehabilitation of the edentulous mandibleNeves,Flávio DominguesMendes,Francielle AlvesBorges,Tânia de FreitasMendonça,Daniela Baccelli SilveiraPrado,Marisa Martins da SilvaZancopé,Karla mastication prostheses and implants dental implants dental prosthesis retention Abstract Aim: To compare the masticatory performance associated with different rehabilitation strategies for patients with edentulous mandibles. Methods: one portion of the test food "Optocal" was provided to groups: Natural Dentition (n = 15), Mandibular Fixed Implant-Supported Prosthesis with Maxillary Fixed Prosthesis (n = 8), Mandibular Fixed Implant-Supported Prosthesis with Maxillary Removable Prosthesis (n = 14), Mandibular Implant-Retained Overdenture with Maxillary Removable Prosthesis (n = 16), and Complete Dentures (n = 16). The portion was collected after 40 chewing strokes, and then passed through a stack of eight sieves with decreasing apertures. Masticatory performance was determined by weighing the portion of food on each sieve. Results: the masticatory performance was: 71.00% for Natural Dentition, 41.57% for Mandibular Fixed Implant-Supported Prosthesis with Maxillary Fixed Prosthesis, 31.44% for Mandibular Fixed Implant-Supported Prosthesis with Maxillary Removable Prosthesis, 27.70% for Mandibular Implant-retained Overdenture, and 14.33% for Complete Dentures. The data were statistically compared using Student's t-test (p < 0.05). Natural Dentition and Complete Denture groups were statistically different from all other groups, with the Natural Dentition and Complete Denture groups exhibiting the highest and lowest masticatory performance values, respectively. Conclusions: Osseointegrated implants improved the masticatory performance of all implant-supported groups compared to the Complete Dentures group.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFaculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba - UNICAMPBrazilian Journal of Oral Sciences v.14 n.3 20152015-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-32252015000300186en10.1590/1677-3225v14n3a02
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Neves,Flávio Domingues
Mendes,Francielle Alves
Borges,Tânia de Freitas
Mendonça,Daniela Baccelli Silveira
Prado,Marisa Martins da Silva
Zancopé,Karla
spellingShingle Neves,Flávio Domingues
Mendes,Francielle Alves
Borges,Tânia de Freitas
Mendonça,Daniela Baccelli Silveira
Prado,Marisa Martins da Silva
Zancopé,Karla
Masticatory performance with different types of rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible
author_facet Neves,Flávio Domingues
Mendes,Francielle Alves
Borges,Tânia de Freitas
Mendonça,Daniela Baccelli Silveira
Prado,Marisa Martins da Silva
Zancopé,Karla
author_sort Neves,Flávio Domingues
title Masticatory performance with different types of rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible
title_short Masticatory performance with different types of rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible
title_full Masticatory performance with different types of rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible
title_fullStr Masticatory performance with different types of rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible
title_full_unstemmed Masticatory performance with different types of rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible
title_sort masticatory performance with different types of rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible
description Abstract Aim: To compare the masticatory performance associated with different rehabilitation strategies for patients with edentulous mandibles. Methods: one portion of the test food "Optocal" was provided to groups: Natural Dentition (n = 15), Mandibular Fixed Implant-Supported Prosthesis with Maxillary Fixed Prosthesis (n = 8), Mandibular Fixed Implant-Supported Prosthesis with Maxillary Removable Prosthesis (n = 14), Mandibular Implant-Retained Overdenture with Maxillary Removable Prosthesis (n = 16), and Complete Dentures (n = 16). The portion was collected after 40 chewing strokes, and then passed through a stack of eight sieves with decreasing apertures. Masticatory performance was determined by weighing the portion of food on each sieve. Results: the masticatory performance was: 71.00% for Natural Dentition, 41.57% for Mandibular Fixed Implant-Supported Prosthesis with Maxillary Fixed Prosthesis, 31.44% for Mandibular Fixed Implant-Supported Prosthesis with Maxillary Removable Prosthesis, 27.70% for Mandibular Implant-retained Overdenture, and 14.33% for Complete Dentures. The data were statistically compared using Student's t-test (p < 0.05). Natural Dentition and Complete Denture groups were statistically different from all other groups, with the Natural Dentition and Complete Denture groups exhibiting the highest and lowest masticatory performance values, respectively. Conclusions: Osseointegrated implants improved the masticatory performance of all implant-supported groups compared to the Complete Dentures group.
publisher Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba - UNICAMP
publishDate 2015
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-32252015000300186
work_keys_str_mv AT nevesflaviodomingues masticatoryperformancewithdifferenttypesofrehabilitationoftheedentulousmandible
AT mendesfranciellealves masticatoryperformancewithdifferenttypesofrehabilitationoftheedentulousmandible
AT borgestaniadefreitas masticatoryperformancewithdifferenttypesofrehabilitationoftheedentulousmandible
AT mendoncadanielabaccellisilveira masticatoryperformancewithdifferenttypesofrehabilitationoftheedentulousmandible
AT pradomarisamartinsdasilva masticatoryperformancewithdifferenttypesofrehabilitationoftheedentulousmandible
AT zancopekarla masticatoryperformancewithdifferenttypesofrehabilitationoftheedentulousmandible
_version_ 1756427720078655488