Masticatory performance with different types of rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible
Abstract Aim: To compare the masticatory performance associated with different rehabilitation strategies for patients with edentulous mandibles. Methods: one portion of the test food "Optocal" was provided to groups: Natural Dentition (n = 15), Mandibular Fixed Implant-Supported Prosthesis with Maxillary Fixed Prosthesis (n = 8), Mandibular Fixed Implant-Supported Prosthesis with Maxillary Removable Prosthesis (n = 14), Mandibular Implant-Retained Overdenture with Maxillary Removable Prosthesis (n = 16), and Complete Dentures (n = 16). The portion was collected after 40 chewing strokes, and then passed through a stack of eight sieves with decreasing apertures. Masticatory performance was determined by weighing the portion of food on each sieve. Results: the masticatory performance was: 71.00% for Natural Dentition, 41.57% for Mandibular Fixed Implant-Supported Prosthesis with Maxillary Fixed Prosthesis, 31.44% for Mandibular Fixed Implant-Supported Prosthesis with Maxillary Removable Prosthesis, 27.70% for Mandibular Implant-retained Overdenture, and 14.33% for Complete Dentures. The data were statistically compared using Student's t-test (p < 0.05). Natural Dentition and Complete Denture groups were statistically different from all other groups, with the Natural Dentition and Complete Denture groups exhibiting the highest and lowest masticatory performance values, respectively. Conclusions: Osseointegrated implants improved the masticatory performance of all implant-supported groups compared to the Complete Dentures group.
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Digital revista |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba - UNICAMP
2015
|
Online Access: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-32252015000300186 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
oai:scielo:S1677-32252015000300186 |
---|---|
record_format |
ojs |
spelling |
oai:scielo:S1677-322520150003001862015-12-16Masticatory performance with different types of rehabilitation of the edentulous mandibleNeves,Flávio DominguesMendes,Francielle AlvesBorges,Tânia de FreitasMendonça,Daniela Baccelli SilveiraPrado,Marisa Martins da SilvaZancopé,Karla mastication prostheses and implants dental implants dental prosthesis retention Abstract Aim: To compare the masticatory performance associated with different rehabilitation strategies for patients with edentulous mandibles. Methods: one portion of the test food "Optocal" was provided to groups: Natural Dentition (n = 15), Mandibular Fixed Implant-Supported Prosthesis with Maxillary Fixed Prosthesis (n = 8), Mandibular Fixed Implant-Supported Prosthesis with Maxillary Removable Prosthesis (n = 14), Mandibular Implant-Retained Overdenture with Maxillary Removable Prosthesis (n = 16), and Complete Dentures (n = 16). The portion was collected after 40 chewing strokes, and then passed through a stack of eight sieves with decreasing apertures. Masticatory performance was determined by weighing the portion of food on each sieve. Results: the masticatory performance was: 71.00% for Natural Dentition, 41.57% for Mandibular Fixed Implant-Supported Prosthesis with Maxillary Fixed Prosthesis, 31.44% for Mandibular Fixed Implant-Supported Prosthesis with Maxillary Removable Prosthesis, 27.70% for Mandibular Implant-retained Overdenture, and 14.33% for Complete Dentures. The data were statistically compared using Student's t-test (p < 0.05). Natural Dentition and Complete Denture groups were statistically different from all other groups, with the Natural Dentition and Complete Denture groups exhibiting the highest and lowest masticatory performance values, respectively. Conclusions: Osseointegrated implants improved the masticatory performance of all implant-supported groups compared to the Complete Dentures group.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFaculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba - UNICAMPBrazilian Journal of Oral Sciences v.14 n.3 20152015-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-32252015000300186en10.1590/1677-3225v14n3a02 |
institution |
SCIELO |
collection |
OJS |
country |
Brasil |
countrycode |
BR |
component |
Revista |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
rev-scielo-br |
tag |
revista |
region |
America del Sur |
libraryname |
SciELO |
language |
English |
format |
Digital |
author |
Neves,Flávio Domingues Mendes,Francielle Alves Borges,Tânia de Freitas Mendonça,Daniela Baccelli Silveira Prado,Marisa Martins da Silva Zancopé,Karla |
spellingShingle |
Neves,Flávio Domingues Mendes,Francielle Alves Borges,Tânia de Freitas Mendonça,Daniela Baccelli Silveira Prado,Marisa Martins da Silva Zancopé,Karla Masticatory performance with different types of rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible |
author_facet |
Neves,Flávio Domingues Mendes,Francielle Alves Borges,Tânia de Freitas Mendonça,Daniela Baccelli Silveira Prado,Marisa Martins da Silva Zancopé,Karla |
author_sort |
Neves,Flávio Domingues |
title |
Masticatory performance with different types of rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible |
title_short |
Masticatory performance with different types of rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible |
title_full |
Masticatory performance with different types of rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible |
title_fullStr |
Masticatory performance with different types of rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible |
title_full_unstemmed |
Masticatory performance with different types of rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible |
title_sort |
masticatory performance with different types of rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible |
description |
Abstract Aim: To compare the masticatory performance associated with different rehabilitation strategies for patients with edentulous mandibles. Methods: one portion of the test food "Optocal" was provided to groups: Natural Dentition (n = 15), Mandibular Fixed Implant-Supported Prosthesis with Maxillary Fixed Prosthesis (n = 8), Mandibular Fixed Implant-Supported Prosthesis with Maxillary Removable Prosthesis (n = 14), Mandibular Implant-Retained Overdenture with Maxillary Removable Prosthesis (n = 16), and Complete Dentures (n = 16). The portion was collected after 40 chewing strokes, and then passed through a stack of eight sieves with decreasing apertures. Masticatory performance was determined by weighing the portion of food on each sieve. Results: the masticatory performance was: 71.00% for Natural Dentition, 41.57% for Mandibular Fixed Implant-Supported Prosthesis with Maxillary Fixed Prosthesis, 31.44% for Mandibular Fixed Implant-Supported Prosthesis with Maxillary Removable Prosthesis, 27.70% for Mandibular Implant-retained Overdenture, and 14.33% for Complete Dentures. The data were statistically compared using Student's t-test (p < 0.05). Natural Dentition and Complete Denture groups were statistically different from all other groups, with the Natural Dentition and Complete Denture groups exhibiting the highest and lowest masticatory performance values, respectively. Conclusions: Osseointegrated implants improved the masticatory performance of all implant-supported groups compared to the Complete Dentures group. |
publisher |
Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba - UNICAMP |
publishDate |
2015 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-32252015000300186 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT nevesflaviodomingues masticatoryperformancewithdifferenttypesofrehabilitationoftheedentulousmandible AT mendesfranciellealves masticatoryperformancewithdifferenttypesofrehabilitationoftheedentulousmandible AT borgestaniadefreitas masticatoryperformancewithdifferenttypesofrehabilitationoftheedentulousmandible AT mendoncadanielabaccellisilveira masticatoryperformancewithdifferenttypesofrehabilitationoftheedentulousmandible AT pradomarisamartinsdasilva masticatoryperformancewithdifferenttypesofrehabilitationoftheedentulousmandible AT zancopekarla masticatoryperformancewithdifferenttypesofrehabilitationoftheedentulousmandible |
_version_ |
1756427720078655488 |