Microleakage in combined amalgam/composite resin restorations in MOD cavities

AIM: To compare marginal seal at tooth-material and material-material interfaces in the proximal box in combined amalgam/composite resin restorations. METHODS: Mesio-occlusal-distal (MOD) cavities were prepared in 35 premolars and permanent molars with carbide bur. The distal proximal box was restored with amalgam (Permite, SDI) until reaching the height of pulpal floor. Dental tissues were etched with 37% acid and a bonding agent (Bond 1-SF, Pentron) was applied and cured. Composite resin (Filtek Z250, 3M-ESPE) was placed in layers in the mesial proximal box and occlusally, and light cured. Marginal adaptation was evaluated at the following interfaces: amalgam-tooth (A), amalgam-composite resin (AC) and composite resin-tooth (C). Microleakage was evaluated by means of methylene blue infiltration after 7-day water storage and thermocycling regimen (1500 cycles). Microleakage was assessed as percentage depth of horizontal dye penetration. RESULTS: ANOVA showed statistically significant difference between A-AC and A-C (p<0.01). No statistically significant difference was found between AC-C interfaces (p&gt;0.05). Mean microleakage values were A (73.529/28.71), AC (34.118/34.6) and C (40.435/34.965), according to Tukey's test. CONCLUSIONS: Although the bonding mechanism between amalgam and composite has not yet been completely explained, amalgam/composite resin interface exhibited the lowest microleakage scores. Since amalgam/composite resin restorations exhibited lower microleakage scores than composite resin on the cervical surface, combined restorations can be considered as a biological and aesthetic alternative to conventional Class II composite or amalgam restorations.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tolidis,Kosmas, Boutsiouki,Christina, Gerasimou,Paris
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba - UNICAMP 2013
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-32252013000200006
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1677-32252013000200006
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1677-322520130002000062013-07-19Microleakage in combined amalgam/composite resin restorations in MOD cavitiesTolidis,KosmasBoutsiouki,ChristinaGerasimou,Paris combined restorations amalgam-composite microleakage class II cavity MOD cavity AIM: To compare marginal seal at tooth-material and material-material interfaces in the proximal box in combined amalgam/composite resin restorations. METHODS: Mesio-occlusal-distal (MOD) cavities were prepared in 35 premolars and permanent molars with carbide bur. The distal proximal box was restored with amalgam (Permite, SDI) until reaching the height of pulpal floor. Dental tissues were etched with 37% acid and a bonding agent (Bond 1-SF, Pentron) was applied and cured. Composite resin (Filtek Z250, 3M-ESPE) was placed in layers in the mesial proximal box and occlusally, and light cured. Marginal adaptation was evaluated at the following interfaces: amalgam-tooth (A), amalgam-composite resin (AC) and composite resin-tooth (C). Microleakage was evaluated by means of methylene blue infiltration after 7-day water storage and thermocycling regimen (1500 cycles). Microleakage was assessed as percentage depth of horizontal dye penetration. RESULTS: ANOVA showed statistically significant difference between A-AC and A-C (p<0.01). No statistically significant difference was found between AC-C interfaces (p&gt;0.05). Mean microleakage values were A (73.529/28.71), AC (34.118/34.6) and C (40.435/34.965), according to Tukey's test. CONCLUSIONS: Although the bonding mechanism between amalgam and composite has not yet been completely explained, amalgam/composite resin interface exhibited the lowest microleakage scores. Since amalgam/composite resin restorations exhibited lower microleakage scores than composite resin on the cervical surface, combined restorations can be considered as a biological and aesthetic alternative to conventional Class II composite or amalgam restorations.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFaculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba - UNICAMPBrazilian Journal of Oral Sciences v.12 n.2 20132013-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-32252013000200006en10.1590/S1677-32252013000200006
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Tolidis,Kosmas
Boutsiouki,Christina
Gerasimou,Paris
spellingShingle Tolidis,Kosmas
Boutsiouki,Christina
Gerasimou,Paris
Microleakage in combined amalgam/composite resin restorations in MOD cavities
author_facet Tolidis,Kosmas
Boutsiouki,Christina
Gerasimou,Paris
author_sort Tolidis,Kosmas
title Microleakage in combined amalgam/composite resin restorations in MOD cavities
title_short Microleakage in combined amalgam/composite resin restorations in MOD cavities
title_full Microleakage in combined amalgam/composite resin restorations in MOD cavities
title_fullStr Microleakage in combined amalgam/composite resin restorations in MOD cavities
title_full_unstemmed Microleakage in combined amalgam/composite resin restorations in MOD cavities
title_sort microleakage in combined amalgam/composite resin restorations in mod cavities
description AIM: To compare marginal seal at tooth-material and material-material interfaces in the proximal box in combined amalgam/composite resin restorations. METHODS: Mesio-occlusal-distal (MOD) cavities were prepared in 35 premolars and permanent molars with carbide bur. The distal proximal box was restored with amalgam (Permite, SDI) until reaching the height of pulpal floor. Dental tissues were etched with 37% acid and a bonding agent (Bond 1-SF, Pentron) was applied and cured. Composite resin (Filtek Z250, 3M-ESPE) was placed in layers in the mesial proximal box and occlusally, and light cured. Marginal adaptation was evaluated at the following interfaces: amalgam-tooth (A), amalgam-composite resin (AC) and composite resin-tooth (C). Microleakage was evaluated by means of methylene blue infiltration after 7-day water storage and thermocycling regimen (1500 cycles). Microleakage was assessed as percentage depth of horizontal dye penetration. RESULTS: ANOVA showed statistically significant difference between A-AC and A-C (p<0.01). No statistically significant difference was found between AC-C interfaces (p&gt;0.05). Mean microleakage values were A (73.529/28.71), AC (34.118/34.6) and C (40.435/34.965), according to Tukey's test. CONCLUSIONS: Although the bonding mechanism between amalgam and composite has not yet been completely explained, amalgam/composite resin interface exhibited the lowest microleakage scores. Since amalgam/composite resin restorations exhibited lower microleakage scores than composite resin on the cervical surface, combined restorations can be considered as a biological and aesthetic alternative to conventional Class II composite or amalgam restorations.
publisher Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba - UNICAMP
publishDate 2013
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-32252013000200006
work_keys_str_mv AT tolidiskosmas microleakageincombinedamalgamcompositeresinrestorationsinmodcavities
AT boutsioukichristina microleakageincombinedamalgamcompositeresinrestorationsinmodcavities
AT gerasimouparis microleakageincombinedamalgamcompositeresinrestorationsinmodcavities
_version_ 1756427701972893696