Métodos contracetivos reversíveis de curta e longa duração: estudo observacional

Overview: The daily pill, a short-acting reversible contraceptive (SARC), is more used than long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARC) though these are highly effective, safe and less dependent on women use. It is important to identify which differences between SARC or LARC users can justify this choice. Aims: Describe and compare the two types of contraceptive methods users (age, marital status, previous history of pregnancy, level of education, age at which the method was started, level and source of knowledge, medical advice and level of satisfaction with the information received). As a secondary objective, we aimed to identify the existence of myths and misbeliefs about contraception and the reasons for choosing or discontinuation of the contraceptive method. Study Design: Observational and retrospective. Population: Women who use or had used contraception, aged 18 -50 years. Methods: A self-report and anonymous questionnaire, available in primary health care centers and hospitals. Results: In a group of 300 women, with a median of 35,6 years (18 - 50 years; s = 8,3 years), 68% (203/300) were using a contraceptive method and 28% (83/300) were no longer using it . Among these, 75% were using SARC or these corresponded to the last method used. Single women prevailed in the SARC group (p=0,002) and those with a previous pregnancy prevailed in the LARC group (p=0,002). No other statistically significant differences were identified. 86% (237/274) had a medical consultation before beginning to use a contraceptive, and 59% (139/237) were very satisfied with the information received. The control of the menstrual cycle was important for SARC users whether the using facility was important for LARC users. Conclusions: Although effective and safe, LARC where less prevalent in our study. History of previous pregnancy was the only clinically significant difference between SARC and LARC users

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Câmara,Sara Camacho, Abreu-dos-Santos,Filipa, Freitas,Cláudia
Format: Digital revista
Language:Portuguese
Published: Euromédice, Edições Médicas Lda. 2016
Online Access:http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-58302016000400005
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1646-58302016000400005
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1646-583020160004000052017-03-06Métodos contracetivos reversíveis de curta e longa duração: estudo observacionalCâmara,Sara CamachoAbreu-dos-Santos,FilipaFreitas,Cláudia Family planning services Contraception Overview: The daily pill, a short-acting reversible contraceptive (SARC), is more used than long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARC) though these are highly effective, safe and less dependent on women use. It is important to identify which differences between SARC or LARC users can justify this choice. Aims: Describe and compare the two types of contraceptive methods users (age, marital status, previous history of pregnancy, level of education, age at which the method was started, level and source of knowledge, medical advice and level of satisfaction with the information received). As a secondary objective, we aimed to identify the existence of myths and misbeliefs about contraception and the reasons for choosing or discontinuation of the contraceptive method. Study Design: Observational and retrospective. Population: Women who use or had used contraception, aged 18 -50 years. Methods: A self-report and anonymous questionnaire, available in primary health care centers and hospitals. Results: In a group of 300 women, with a median of 35,6 years (18 - 50 years; s = 8,3 years), 68% (203/300) were using a contraceptive method and 28% (83/300) were no longer using it . Among these, 75% were using SARC or these corresponded to the last method used. Single women prevailed in the SARC group (p=0,002) and those with a previous pregnancy prevailed in the LARC group (p=0,002). No other statistically significant differences were identified. 86% (237/274) had a medical consultation before beginning to use a contraceptive, and 59% (139/237) were very satisfied with the information received. The control of the menstrual cycle was important for SARC users whether the using facility was important for LARC users. Conclusions: Although effective and safe, LARC where less prevalent in our study. History of previous pregnancy was the only clinically significant difference between SARC and LARC usersinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEuromédice, Edições Médicas Lda.Acta Obstétrica e Ginecológica Portuguesa v.10 n.4 20162016-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-58302016000400005pt
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Portugal
countrycode PT
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-pt
tag revista
region Europa del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language Portuguese
format Digital
author Câmara,Sara Camacho
Abreu-dos-Santos,Filipa
Freitas,Cláudia
spellingShingle Câmara,Sara Camacho
Abreu-dos-Santos,Filipa
Freitas,Cláudia
Métodos contracetivos reversíveis de curta e longa duração: estudo observacional
author_facet Câmara,Sara Camacho
Abreu-dos-Santos,Filipa
Freitas,Cláudia
author_sort Câmara,Sara Camacho
title Métodos contracetivos reversíveis de curta e longa duração: estudo observacional
title_short Métodos contracetivos reversíveis de curta e longa duração: estudo observacional
title_full Métodos contracetivos reversíveis de curta e longa duração: estudo observacional
title_fullStr Métodos contracetivos reversíveis de curta e longa duração: estudo observacional
title_full_unstemmed Métodos contracetivos reversíveis de curta e longa duração: estudo observacional
title_sort métodos contracetivos reversíveis de curta e longa duração: estudo observacional
description Overview: The daily pill, a short-acting reversible contraceptive (SARC), is more used than long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARC) though these are highly effective, safe and less dependent on women use. It is important to identify which differences between SARC or LARC users can justify this choice. Aims: Describe and compare the two types of contraceptive methods users (age, marital status, previous history of pregnancy, level of education, age at which the method was started, level and source of knowledge, medical advice and level of satisfaction with the information received). As a secondary objective, we aimed to identify the existence of myths and misbeliefs about contraception and the reasons for choosing or discontinuation of the contraceptive method. Study Design: Observational and retrospective. Population: Women who use or had used contraception, aged 18 -50 years. Methods: A self-report and anonymous questionnaire, available in primary health care centers and hospitals. Results: In a group of 300 women, with a median of 35,6 years (18 - 50 years; s = 8,3 years), 68% (203/300) were using a contraceptive method and 28% (83/300) were no longer using it . Among these, 75% were using SARC or these corresponded to the last method used. Single women prevailed in the SARC group (p=0,002) and those with a previous pregnancy prevailed in the LARC group (p=0,002). No other statistically significant differences were identified. 86% (237/274) had a medical consultation before beginning to use a contraceptive, and 59% (139/237) were very satisfied with the information received. The control of the menstrual cycle was important for SARC users whether the using facility was important for LARC users. Conclusions: Although effective and safe, LARC where less prevalent in our study. History of previous pregnancy was the only clinically significant difference between SARC and LARC users
publisher Euromédice, Edições Médicas Lda.
publishDate 2016
url http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-58302016000400005
work_keys_str_mv AT camarasaracamacho metodoscontracetivosreversiveisdecurtaelongaduracaoestudoobservacional
AT abreudossantosfilipa metodoscontracetivosreversiveisdecurtaelongaduracaoestudoobservacional
AT freitasclaudia metodoscontracetivosreversiveisdecurtaelongaduracaoestudoobservacional
_version_ 1756003211425087488