QUADRICEPS AUTOGRAFT IN ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION: A LITERATURE REVIEW

ABSTRACT Introduction: Anterior cruciate ligament injury is one of the most prevalent musculoskeletal injuries. Therefore, several surgical techniques and graft types have been described for its reconstruction. Autologous hamstring tendon graft is one of the most frequently used, but use of the quadriceps tendon graft has gained prominence in recent years. Objective: To review the literature to compare the outcomes of patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft versus hamstring tendon (HT) autograft. Methods: A literature review was conducted through PubMed to locate studies (Level of evidence I-III) comparing the outcomes of the QT autograft vs. the HT autograft in patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction. Patients were assessed on the basis of re-rupture rate, ligament instability, patient-reported outcome scores, previous pain, and isokinetic tests. Results: Six studies were selected according to inclusion criteria. A total of 481 patients were evaluated, 243 in the QT group and 238 in the HT group. The total re-rupture rate was 1.6% (8 of 481), with 6 in the HT group and 2 in the QT group, but with no statistical difference between groups. One study found increased ligament instability in the HT group and another study found greater instability in the QT group, both with statistical significance. Regarding the patient-reported functional scores, only 01 study found statistical difference, with better results in the QT group. There was no difference in previous pain between groups in the selected studies. Regarding the isokinetic test, one study found a difference in flexor force in the HT group (p <0.01), with no difference in extensor force, while another two studies found an increased extensor force deficit in the QT group within up to 01 year of follow-up. The flexor/ extensor muscle strength ratio was higher in the QT group in both studies. Conclusion: ACL reconstruction with QT graft presents re-rupture rates, ligament instability, functional scores and donor site morbidity that are similar to the HT graft, in addition to preserving greater flexor force in proportion to extensor force. Level of evidence: IV; Review study.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Salas,Victor Eduardo Roman, Oliveira,Diego Escudeiro de, Lima,Marcos Vaz de, Duarte Junior,Aires, Guglielmetti,Luiz Gabriel Betoni, Cury,Ricardo de Paula Leite, Jorge,Pedro Baches
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina do Exercício e do Esporte 2020
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-86922020000100058
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1517-86922020000100058
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1517-869220200001000582020-01-09QUADRICEPS AUTOGRAFT IN ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION: A LITERATURE REVIEWSalas,Victor Eduardo RomanOliveira,Diego Escudeiro deLima,Marcos Vaz deDuarte Junior,AiresGuglielmetti,Luiz Gabriel BetoniCury,Ricardo de Paula LeiteJorge,Pedro Baches Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction Quadriceps muscle Hamstring tendons Transplantation autologous ABSTRACT Introduction: Anterior cruciate ligament injury is one of the most prevalent musculoskeletal injuries. Therefore, several surgical techniques and graft types have been described for its reconstruction. Autologous hamstring tendon graft is one of the most frequently used, but use of the quadriceps tendon graft has gained prominence in recent years. Objective: To review the literature to compare the outcomes of patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft versus hamstring tendon (HT) autograft. Methods: A literature review was conducted through PubMed to locate studies (Level of evidence I-III) comparing the outcomes of the QT autograft vs. the HT autograft in patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction. Patients were assessed on the basis of re-rupture rate, ligament instability, patient-reported outcome scores, previous pain, and isokinetic tests. Results: Six studies were selected according to inclusion criteria. A total of 481 patients were evaluated, 243 in the QT group and 238 in the HT group. The total re-rupture rate was 1.6% (8 of 481), with 6 in the HT group and 2 in the QT group, but with no statistical difference between groups. One study found increased ligament instability in the HT group and another study found greater instability in the QT group, both with statistical significance. Regarding the patient-reported functional scores, only 01 study found statistical difference, with better results in the QT group. There was no difference in previous pain between groups in the selected studies. Regarding the isokinetic test, one study found a difference in flexor force in the HT group (p <0.01), with no difference in extensor force, while another two studies found an increased extensor force deficit in the QT group within up to 01 year of follow-up. The flexor/ extensor muscle strength ratio was higher in the QT group in both studies. Conclusion: ACL reconstruction with QT graft presents re-rupture rates, ligament instability, functional scores and donor site morbidity that are similar to the HT graft, in addition to preserving greater flexor force in proportion to extensor force. Level of evidence: IV; Review study.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedade Brasileira de Medicina do Exercício e do EsporteRevista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte v.26 n.1 20202020-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-86922020000100058en10.1590/1517-869220202601214002
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Salas,Victor Eduardo Roman
Oliveira,Diego Escudeiro de
Lima,Marcos Vaz de
Duarte Junior,Aires
Guglielmetti,Luiz Gabriel Betoni
Cury,Ricardo de Paula Leite
Jorge,Pedro Baches
spellingShingle Salas,Victor Eduardo Roman
Oliveira,Diego Escudeiro de
Lima,Marcos Vaz de
Duarte Junior,Aires
Guglielmetti,Luiz Gabriel Betoni
Cury,Ricardo de Paula Leite
Jorge,Pedro Baches
QUADRICEPS AUTOGRAFT IN ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION: A LITERATURE REVIEW
author_facet Salas,Victor Eduardo Roman
Oliveira,Diego Escudeiro de
Lima,Marcos Vaz de
Duarte Junior,Aires
Guglielmetti,Luiz Gabriel Betoni
Cury,Ricardo de Paula Leite
Jorge,Pedro Baches
author_sort Salas,Victor Eduardo Roman
title QUADRICEPS AUTOGRAFT IN ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION: A LITERATURE REVIEW
title_short QUADRICEPS AUTOGRAFT IN ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION: A LITERATURE REVIEW
title_full QUADRICEPS AUTOGRAFT IN ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION: A LITERATURE REVIEW
title_fullStr QUADRICEPS AUTOGRAFT IN ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION: A LITERATURE REVIEW
title_full_unstemmed QUADRICEPS AUTOGRAFT IN ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION: A LITERATURE REVIEW
title_sort quadriceps autograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a literature review
description ABSTRACT Introduction: Anterior cruciate ligament injury is one of the most prevalent musculoskeletal injuries. Therefore, several surgical techniques and graft types have been described for its reconstruction. Autologous hamstring tendon graft is one of the most frequently used, but use of the quadriceps tendon graft has gained prominence in recent years. Objective: To review the literature to compare the outcomes of patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft versus hamstring tendon (HT) autograft. Methods: A literature review was conducted through PubMed to locate studies (Level of evidence I-III) comparing the outcomes of the QT autograft vs. the HT autograft in patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction. Patients were assessed on the basis of re-rupture rate, ligament instability, patient-reported outcome scores, previous pain, and isokinetic tests. Results: Six studies were selected according to inclusion criteria. A total of 481 patients were evaluated, 243 in the QT group and 238 in the HT group. The total re-rupture rate was 1.6% (8 of 481), with 6 in the HT group and 2 in the QT group, but with no statistical difference between groups. One study found increased ligament instability in the HT group and another study found greater instability in the QT group, both with statistical significance. Regarding the patient-reported functional scores, only 01 study found statistical difference, with better results in the QT group. There was no difference in previous pain between groups in the selected studies. Regarding the isokinetic test, one study found a difference in flexor force in the HT group (p <0.01), with no difference in extensor force, while another two studies found an increased extensor force deficit in the QT group within up to 01 year of follow-up. The flexor/ extensor muscle strength ratio was higher in the QT group in both studies. Conclusion: ACL reconstruction with QT graft presents re-rupture rates, ligament instability, functional scores and donor site morbidity that are similar to the HT graft, in addition to preserving greater flexor force in proportion to extensor force. Level of evidence: IV; Review study.
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina do Exercício e do Esporte
publishDate 2020
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-86922020000100058
work_keys_str_mv AT salasvictoreduardoroman quadricepsautograftinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionaliteraturereview
AT oliveiradiegoescudeirode quadricepsautograftinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionaliteraturereview
AT limamarcosvazde quadricepsautograftinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionaliteraturereview
AT duartejunioraires quadricepsautograftinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionaliteraturereview
AT guglielmettiluizgabrielbetoni quadricepsautograftinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionaliteraturereview
AT curyricardodepaulaleite quadricepsautograftinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionaliteraturereview
AT jorgepedrobaches quadricepsautograftinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionaliteraturereview
_version_ 1756425375418679296