Zika detection: comparison of methodologies

ABSTRACT Many countries in the Americas have detected local transmission of multiple arboviruses that cause febrile illnesses. Therefore, laboratory testing has become an important tool for confirming the etiology of these diseases. The present study aimed to compare the sensitivity and specificity of three different Zika virus detection assays. One hundred serum samples from patients presenting with acute febrile symptoms were tested using a previously reported TaqMan® RT-qPCR assay. We used a SYBR® Green RT-qPCR and a conventional PCR methodologies to compare the results. Of the samples that were determined to be negative by the TaqMan® RT-qPCR assay, 100% (Kappa = 0.670) were also found to be negative by SYBR® Green RT-qPCR based on Tm comparison; however, 14% (Kappa = 0.035) were found to be positive by conventional PCR followed by agarose gel electrophoresis. The differences between the ZIKV strains circulating worldwide and the low viremia period can compromise diagnostic accuracy and thereby the accuracy of outbreak data. Therefore, improved assays are required to improve the diagnosis and surveillance of arbovirus.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Colombo,Tatiana Elias, Terzian,Ana Carolina Bernardes, Araújo Júnior,João Pessoa, Parreira,Ricardo, Cabrera,Eliana Márcia Sotello, Santos,Izalco Nuremberg Penha dos, Reis,Andréia Francesli Negri, Costa,Fabiana Rodrigues, Cruz,Lilian Elisa Arão Antônio, Rombola,Patrícia Lopes, Nogueira,Maurício Lacerda
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia 2018
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-83822018000100144
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1517-83822018000100144
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1517-838220180001001442018-02-20Zika detection: comparison of methodologiesColombo,Tatiana EliasTerzian,Ana Carolina BernardesAraújo Júnior,João PessoaParreira,RicardoCabrera,Eliana Márcia SotelloSantos,Izalco Nuremberg Penha dosReis,Andréia Francesli NegriCosta,Fabiana RodriguesCruz,Lilian Elisa Arão AntônioRombola,Patrícia LopesNogueira,Maurício Lacerda Zika virus Detection Sensitivity Specificity ABSTRACT Many countries in the Americas have detected local transmission of multiple arboviruses that cause febrile illnesses. Therefore, laboratory testing has become an important tool for confirming the etiology of these diseases. The present study aimed to compare the sensitivity and specificity of three different Zika virus detection assays. One hundred serum samples from patients presenting with acute febrile symptoms were tested using a previously reported TaqMan® RT-qPCR assay. We used a SYBR® Green RT-qPCR and a conventional PCR methodologies to compare the results. Of the samples that were determined to be negative by the TaqMan® RT-qPCR assay, 100% (Kappa = 0.670) were also found to be negative by SYBR® Green RT-qPCR based on Tm comparison; however, 14% (Kappa = 0.035) were found to be positive by conventional PCR followed by agarose gel electrophoresis. The differences between the ZIKV strains circulating worldwide and the low viremia period can compromise diagnostic accuracy and thereby the accuracy of outbreak data. Therefore, improved assays are required to improve the diagnosis and surveillance of arbovirus.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedade Brasileira de MicrobiologiaBrazilian Journal of Microbiology v.49 n.1 20182018-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-83822018000100144en10.1016/j.bjm.2017.04.011
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Colombo,Tatiana Elias
Terzian,Ana Carolina Bernardes
Araújo Júnior,João Pessoa
Parreira,Ricardo
Cabrera,Eliana Márcia Sotello
Santos,Izalco Nuremberg Penha dos
Reis,Andréia Francesli Negri
Costa,Fabiana Rodrigues
Cruz,Lilian Elisa Arão Antônio
Rombola,Patrícia Lopes
Nogueira,Maurício Lacerda
spellingShingle Colombo,Tatiana Elias
Terzian,Ana Carolina Bernardes
Araújo Júnior,João Pessoa
Parreira,Ricardo
Cabrera,Eliana Márcia Sotello
Santos,Izalco Nuremberg Penha dos
Reis,Andréia Francesli Negri
Costa,Fabiana Rodrigues
Cruz,Lilian Elisa Arão Antônio
Rombola,Patrícia Lopes
Nogueira,Maurício Lacerda
Zika detection: comparison of methodologies
author_facet Colombo,Tatiana Elias
Terzian,Ana Carolina Bernardes
Araújo Júnior,João Pessoa
Parreira,Ricardo
Cabrera,Eliana Márcia Sotello
Santos,Izalco Nuremberg Penha dos
Reis,Andréia Francesli Negri
Costa,Fabiana Rodrigues
Cruz,Lilian Elisa Arão Antônio
Rombola,Patrícia Lopes
Nogueira,Maurício Lacerda
author_sort Colombo,Tatiana Elias
title Zika detection: comparison of methodologies
title_short Zika detection: comparison of methodologies
title_full Zika detection: comparison of methodologies
title_fullStr Zika detection: comparison of methodologies
title_full_unstemmed Zika detection: comparison of methodologies
title_sort zika detection: comparison of methodologies
description ABSTRACT Many countries in the Americas have detected local transmission of multiple arboviruses that cause febrile illnesses. Therefore, laboratory testing has become an important tool for confirming the etiology of these diseases. The present study aimed to compare the sensitivity and specificity of three different Zika virus detection assays. One hundred serum samples from patients presenting with acute febrile symptoms were tested using a previously reported TaqMan® RT-qPCR assay. We used a SYBR® Green RT-qPCR and a conventional PCR methodologies to compare the results. Of the samples that were determined to be negative by the TaqMan® RT-qPCR assay, 100% (Kappa = 0.670) were also found to be negative by SYBR® Green RT-qPCR based on Tm comparison; however, 14% (Kappa = 0.035) were found to be positive by conventional PCR followed by agarose gel electrophoresis. The differences between the ZIKV strains circulating worldwide and the low viremia period can compromise diagnostic accuracy and thereby the accuracy of outbreak data. Therefore, improved assays are required to improve the diagnosis and surveillance of arbovirus.
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia
publishDate 2018
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-83822018000100144
work_keys_str_mv AT colombotatianaelias zikadetectioncomparisonofmethodologies
AT terziananacarolinabernardes zikadetectioncomparisonofmethodologies
AT araujojuniorjoaopessoa zikadetectioncomparisonofmethodologies
AT parreiraricardo zikadetectioncomparisonofmethodologies
AT cabreraelianamarciasotello zikadetectioncomparisonofmethodologies
AT santosizalconurembergpenhados zikadetectioncomparisonofmethodologies
AT reisandreiafranceslinegri zikadetectioncomparisonofmethodologies
AT costafabianarodrigues zikadetectioncomparisonofmethodologies
AT cruzlilianelisaaraoantonio zikadetectioncomparisonofmethodologies
AT rombolapatricialopes zikadetectioncomparisonofmethodologies
AT nogueiramauriciolacerda zikadetectioncomparisonofmethodologies
_version_ 1756425132012732416