Treatment of shrimp effluent by sedimentation and oyster filtration using Crassostrea gigas and C. rhizophorae

Efficiency in removing particulate matter from Litopenaeus vannamei shrimp culture effluent was assessed in laboratory scale employing sedimentation and oysters Crassostrea gigas and C. rhizophorae filtration processes. Cylindroconical tanks (100 L) were used in duplicate for sedimentation and 50-L in triplicate for oyster filtration. Fifteen oysters of each species weighing 76-80 g were stocked in each of the filtration treatment experimental units (biomass of 1065 - 1174 g oyster per unit). The control treatment was a tank similar to those used in the filtration treatment but with empty oyster shells. Hydraulic retention time of the effluent was of 6 hours in each treatment. First, effluent went through sedimentation, and then the supernatant went through the filtration tanks. Temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, salinity, turbidity, total suspended solids, total volatile solids, chlorophyll a and BOD5 were evaluated. During sedimentation and filtration, temperature, pH, salinity and dissolved oxygen concentration remained stable. Sedimentation removed 18, 5.6, 27.5, 45.40 and 23.2% of turbidity, total suspended solids, total volatile solids, chlorophyll a and BOD5, respectively. Chlorophyll a and BOD5 after sedimentation presented significant difference (P<0.05) from the farm crude effluent. For the filtration treatment, C. rhizophorae was more efficient removing 62.1, 70.6, 36.1, 100 and 17.2% of turbidity, total suspended solids, total volatile solids, chlorophyll a and BOD5, respectively, whereas C. gigas removed 56.3, 41.2, 27.8, 51.4 and 8.0% of the same parameters. Statistically comparing C. rhizophorae and C. gigas performances, there were differences (P<0.05) in removing total suspended solids, total volatile solids and chlorophyll a.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ramos,Roberto, Vinatea,Luis, Seiffert,Walter, Beltrame,Elpídio, Silva,Júlia Santos, Costa,Rejane Helena Ribeiro da
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Instituto de Tecnologia do Paraná - Tecpar 2009
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-89132009000300030
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1516-89132009000300030
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1516-891320090003000302009-07-22Treatment of shrimp effluent by sedimentation and oyster filtration using Crassostrea gigas and C. rhizophoraeRamos,RobertoVinatea,LuisSeiffert,WalterBeltrame,ElpídioSilva,Júlia SantosCosta,Rejane Helena Ribeiro da Oysters filtration sedimentation effluent Litopenaeus vannamei Efficiency in removing particulate matter from Litopenaeus vannamei shrimp culture effluent was assessed in laboratory scale employing sedimentation and oysters Crassostrea gigas and C. rhizophorae filtration processes. Cylindroconical tanks (100 L) were used in duplicate for sedimentation and 50-L in triplicate for oyster filtration. Fifteen oysters of each species weighing 76-80 g were stocked in each of the filtration treatment experimental units (biomass of 1065 - 1174 g oyster per unit). The control treatment was a tank similar to those used in the filtration treatment but with empty oyster shells. Hydraulic retention time of the effluent was of 6 hours in each treatment. First, effluent went through sedimentation, and then the supernatant went through the filtration tanks. Temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, salinity, turbidity, total suspended solids, total volatile solids, chlorophyll a and BOD5 were evaluated. During sedimentation and filtration, temperature, pH, salinity and dissolved oxygen concentration remained stable. Sedimentation removed 18, 5.6, 27.5, 45.40 and 23.2% of turbidity, total suspended solids, total volatile solids, chlorophyll a and BOD5, respectively. Chlorophyll a and BOD5 after sedimentation presented significant difference (P<0.05) from the farm crude effluent. For the filtration treatment, C. rhizophorae was more efficient removing 62.1, 70.6, 36.1, 100 and 17.2% of turbidity, total suspended solids, total volatile solids, chlorophyll a and BOD5, respectively, whereas C. gigas removed 56.3, 41.2, 27.8, 51.4 and 8.0% of the same parameters. Statistically comparing C. rhizophorae and C. gigas performances, there were differences (P<0.05) in removing total suspended solids, total volatile solids and chlorophyll a.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessInstituto de Tecnologia do Paraná - TecparBrazilian Archives of Biology and Technology v.52 n.3 20092009-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-89132009000300030en10.1590/S1516-89132009000300030
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Ramos,Roberto
Vinatea,Luis
Seiffert,Walter
Beltrame,Elpídio
Silva,Júlia Santos
Costa,Rejane Helena Ribeiro da
spellingShingle Ramos,Roberto
Vinatea,Luis
Seiffert,Walter
Beltrame,Elpídio
Silva,Júlia Santos
Costa,Rejane Helena Ribeiro da
Treatment of shrimp effluent by sedimentation and oyster filtration using Crassostrea gigas and C. rhizophorae
author_facet Ramos,Roberto
Vinatea,Luis
Seiffert,Walter
Beltrame,Elpídio
Silva,Júlia Santos
Costa,Rejane Helena Ribeiro da
author_sort Ramos,Roberto
title Treatment of shrimp effluent by sedimentation and oyster filtration using Crassostrea gigas and C. rhizophorae
title_short Treatment of shrimp effluent by sedimentation and oyster filtration using Crassostrea gigas and C. rhizophorae
title_full Treatment of shrimp effluent by sedimentation and oyster filtration using Crassostrea gigas and C. rhizophorae
title_fullStr Treatment of shrimp effluent by sedimentation and oyster filtration using Crassostrea gigas and C. rhizophorae
title_full_unstemmed Treatment of shrimp effluent by sedimentation and oyster filtration using Crassostrea gigas and C. rhizophorae
title_sort treatment of shrimp effluent by sedimentation and oyster filtration using crassostrea gigas and c. rhizophorae
description Efficiency in removing particulate matter from Litopenaeus vannamei shrimp culture effluent was assessed in laboratory scale employing sedimentation and oysters Crassostrea gigas and C. rhizophorae filtration processes. Cylindroconical tanks (100 L) were used in duplicate for sedimentation and 50-L in triplicate for oyster filtration. Fifteen oysters of each species weighing 76-80 g were stocked in each of the filtration treatment experimental units (biomass of 1065 - 1174 g oyster per unit). The control treatment was a tank similar to those used in the filtration treatment but with empty oyster shells. Hydraulic retention time of the effluent was of 6 hours in each treatment. First, effluent went through sedimentation, and then the supernatant went through the filtration tanks. Temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, salinity, turbidity, total suspended solids, total volatile solids, chlorophyll a and BOD5 were evaluated. During sedimentation and filtration, temperature, pH, salinity and dissolved oxygen concentration remained stable. Sedimentation removed 18, 5.6, 27.5, 45.40 and 23.2% of turbidity, total suspended solids, total volatile solids, chlorophyll a and BOD5, respectively. Chlorophyll a and BOD5 after sedimentation presented significant difference (P<0.05) from the farm crude effluent. For the filtration treatment, C. rhizophorae was more efficient removing 62.1, 70.6, 36.1, 100 and 17.2% of turbidity, total suspended solids, total volatile solids, chlorophyll a and BOD5, respectively, whereas C. gigas removed 56.3, 41.2, 27.8, 51.4 and 8.0% of the same parameters. Statistically comparing C. rhizophorae and C. gigas performances, there were differences (P<0.05) in removing total suspended solids, total volatile solids and chlorophyll a.
publisher Instituto de Tecnologia do Paraná - Tecpar
publishDate 2009
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-89132009000300030
work_keys_str_mv AT ramosroberto treatmentofshrimpeffluentbysedimentationandoysterfiltrationusingcrassostreagigasandcrhizophorae
AT vinatealuis treatmentofshrimpeffluentbysedimentationandoysterfiltrationusingcrassostreagigasandcrhizophorae
AT seiffertwalter treatmentofshrimpeffluentbysedimentationandoysterfiltrationusingcrassostreagigasandcrhizophorae
AT beltrameelpidio treatmentofshrimpeffluentbysedimentationandoysterfiltrationusingcrassostreagigasandcrhizophorae
AT silvajuliasantos treatmentofshrimpeffluentbysedimentationandoysterfiltrationusingcrassostreagigasandcrhizophorae
AT costarejanehelenaribeiroda treatmentofshrimpeffluentbysedimentationandoysterfiltrationusingcrassostreagigasandcrhizophorae
_version_ 1756423807244959744