Effectiveness of confidential unit exclusion in screening blood donors of the regional blood bank in Londrina, Paraná State

BACKGROUND: For transfusion purposes, blood donors must be accepted both in clinical and serological evaluations and must not have excluded their own donation using the confidential unit exclusion. AIMS: The objective of this study was to verify whether blood donors who choose self exclusion are more likely to be positive in serological tests than donors who do not. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis was carried out of 51,861 consecutive whole blood donations from January 2004 to December 2008 at a public blood bank in Londrina, Southern Brazil. RESULTS: Self exclusion was chosen in 1672 (3.2%) donations, most frequently by first-time blood donors (p-value < 0.0001), by blood donors from external collections (p-value < 0.0001), by men (p value < 0.0001) and by under 30-year-old donors (p-value < 0.0001). The frequency of positive serology was 5.3% in the group that chose self exclusion and 3.5% in the group that did not choose self exclusion (p-value < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: These results show that confidential unit exclusion used in this blood bank is effective and is inexpensive. However, the diagnostic power to detect blood-borne infections was low and resulted in the discard of a high number of blood bags without any direct or indirect serologic markers of pathogens. The use of confidential unit exclusion could be replaced with molecular tests to screen blood donors.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vogler,Ingridt Hildegard, Saito,Mariza, Spinosa,Adriana Aparecida, Silva,Marilza Celina da, Munhoz,Egberto, Reiche,Edna Maria Vissoci
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Associação Brasileira de Hematologia e Hemoterapia e Terapia Celular 2011
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-84842011000500010
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1516-84842011000500010
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1516-848420110005000102011-11-22Effectiveness of confidential unit exclusion in screening blood donors of the regional blood bank in Londrina, Paraná StateVogler,Ingridt HildegardSaito,MarizaSpinosa,Adriana AparecidaSilva,Marilza Celina daMunhoz,EgbertoReiche,Edna Maria Vissoci Donor selection Serologic tests Diagnosis Blood transfusion BACKGROUND: For transfusion purposes, blood donors must be accepted both in clinical and serological evaluations and must not have excluded their own donation using the confidential unit exclusion. AIMS: The objective of this study was to verify whether blood donors who choose self exclusion are more likely to be positive in serological tests than donors who do not. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis was carried out of 51,861 consecutive whole blood donations from January 2004 to December 2008 at a public blood bank in Londrina, Southern Brazil. RESULTS: Self exclusion was chosen in 1672 (3.2%) donations, most frequently by first-time blood donors (p-value < 0.0001), by blood donors from external collections (p-value < 0.0001), by men (p value < 0.0001) and by under 30-year-old donors (p-value < 0.0001). The frequency of positive serology was 5.3% in the group that chose self exclusion and 3.5% in the group that did not choose self exclusion (p-value < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: These results show that confidential unit exclusion used in this blood bank is effective and is inexpensive. However, the diagnostic power to detect blood-borne infections was low and resulted in the discard of a high number of blood bags without any direct or indirect serologic markers of pathogens. The use of confidential unit exclusion could be replaced with molecular tests to screen blood donors.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAssociação Brasileira de Hematologia e Hemoterapia e Terapia CelularRevista Brasileira de Hematologia e Hemoterapia v.33 n.5 20112011-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-84842011000500010en10.5581/1516-8484.20110097
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Vogler,Ingridt Hildegard
Saito,Mariza
Spinosa,Adriana Aparecida
Silva,Marilza Celina da
Munhoz,Egberto
Reiche,Edna Maria Vissoci
spellingShingle Vogler,Ingridt Hildegard
Saito,Mariza
Spinosa,Adriana Aparecida
Silva,Marilza Celina da
Munhoz,Egberto
Reiche,Edna Maria Vissoci
Effectiveness of confidential unit exclusion in screening blood donors of the regional blood bank in Londrina, Paraná State
author_facet Vogler,Ingridt Hildegard
Saito,Mariza
Spinosa,Adriana Aparecida
Silva,Marilza Celina da
Munhoz,Egberto
Reiche,Edna Maria Vissoci
author_sort Vogler,Ingridt Hildegard
title Effectiveness of confidential unit exclusion in screening blood donors of the regional blood bank in Londrina, Paraná State
title_short Effectiveness of confidential unit exclusion in screening blood donors of the regional blood bank in Londrina, Paraná State
title_full Effectiveness of confidential unit exclusion in screening blood donors of the regional blood bank in Londrina, Paraná State
title_fullStr Effectiveness of confidential unit exclusion in screening blood donors of the regional blood bank in Londrina, Paraná State
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of confidential unit exclusion in screening blood donors of the regional blood bank in Londrina, Paraná State
title_sort effectiveness of confidential unit exclusion in screening blood donors of the regional blood bank in londrina, paraná state
description BACKGROUND: For transfusion purposes, blood donors must be accepted both in clinical and serological evaluations and must not have excluded their own donation using the confidential unit exclusion. AIMS: The objective of this study was to verify whether blood donors who choose self exclusion are more likely to be positive in serological tests than donors who do not. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis was carried out of 51,861 consecutive whole blood donations from January 2004 to December 2008 at a public blood bank in Londrina, Southern Brazil. RESULTS: Self exclusion was chosen in 1672 (3.2%) donations, most frequently by first-time blood donors (p-value < 0.0001), by blood donors from external collections (p-value < 0.0001), by men (p value < 0.0001) and by under 30-year-old donors (p-value < 0.0001). The frequency of positive serology was 5.3% in the group that chose self exclusion and 3.5% in the group that did not choose self exclusion (p-value < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: These results show that confidential unit exclusion used in this blood bank is effective and is inexpensive. However, the diagnostic power to detect blood-borne infections was low and resulted in the discard of a high number of blood bags without any direct or indirect serologic markers of pathogens. The use of confidential unit exclusion could be replaced with molecular tests to screen blood donors.
publisher Associação Brasileira de Hematologia e Hemoterapia e Terapia Celular
publishDate 2011
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-84842011000500010
work_keys_str_mv AT vogleringridthildegard effectivenessofconfidentialunitexclusioninscreeningblooddonorsoftheregionalbloodbankinlondrinaparanastate
AT saitomariza effectivenessofconfidentialunitexclusioninscreeningblooddonorsoftheregionalbloodbankinlondrinaparanastate
AT spinosaadrianaaparecida effectivenessofconfidentialunitexclusioninscreeningblooddonorsoftheregionalbloodbankinlondrinaparanastate
AT silvamarilzacelinada effectivenessofconfidentialunitexclusioninscreeningblooddonorsoftheregionalbloodbankinlondrinaparanastate
AT munhozegberto effectivenessofconfidentialunitexclusioninscreeningblooddonorsoftheregionalbloodbankinlondrinaparanastate
AT reicheednamariavissoci effectivenessofconfidentialunitexclusioninscreeningblooddonorsoftheregionalbloodbankinlondrinaparanastate
_version_ 1756423536657825792