Low-dose ketamine does not improve the speed of recovery from depression in electroconvulsive therapy: a randomized controlled trial

Objective: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a well-established therapeutic intervention for major depressive disorder. Recent literature has shown that the anesthetic agent ketamine has some antidepressant properties at low doses and may be an alternative therapy for treatment-resistant major depressive disorder. We hypothesized that the use of low-dose ketamine as an anesthetic adjunct in ECT would more rapidly improve depression while maintaining hemodynamic stability than ECT with propofol alone. Methods: Institutional ethics approval was obtained, and the use of ketamine in this study was approved by Health Canada. This is a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial that involved ketamine administration at 0.5 mg/kg IV in addition to propofol anesthesia for ECT. The primary outcome was the number of ECT treatments required to achieve a 50% reduction in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Secondary outcomes included the number of ECT treatments required to achieve a 25% reduction in MADRS score, as well as any differences in the Clinical Global Impression Scale for Severity, hemodynamic variables, and seizure duration. Adverse events were recorded for safety assessment. Results: A total of 45 patients completed the study. No difference was found between groups with respect to the primary or secondary outcomes. The ketamine group showed a trend towards a decreased dose of propofol required to achieve adequate anesthesia. No adverse events were reported. Conclusion: Low-dose ketamine does not improve psychiatric outcomes in the setting of propofol-based anesthesia for ECT. Specifically, ketamine did not reduce the number of ECT sessions necessary to achieve a 50 or 25% reduction in MADRS scores. Reassuringly, the fact that no differences in hemodynamic variables or unexpected adverse events occurred suggests that low-dose ketamine may be safely used in this setting should clinical indications warrant its use. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02579642

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Woolsey,Adrianna J., Nanji,Jalal A., Moreau,Chantal, Sivapalan,Sudhakar, Bourque,Stephane L., Ceccherini-Nelli,Alfonso, Gragasin,Ferrante S.
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria 2022
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-44462022000100006
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1516-44462022000100006
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1516-444620220001000062022-02-23Low-dose ketamine does not improve the speed of recovery from depression in electroconvulsive therapy: a randomized controlled trialWoolsey,Adrianna J.Nanji,Jalal A.Moreau,ChantalSivapalan,SudhakarBourque,Stephane L.Ceccherini-Nelli,AlfonsoGragasin,Ferrante S. Depressive disorder major/drug therapy depressive disorder major/therapy ketamine/therapeutic use anesthesia/therapeutic use electroconvulsive therapy/therapeutic use ketamine/adverse effects Objective: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a well-established therapeutic intervention for major depressive disorder. Recent literature has shown that the anesthetic agent ketamine has some antidepressant properties at low doses and may be an alternative therapy for treatment-resistant major depressive disorder. We hypothesized that the use of low-dose ketamine as an anesthetic adjunct in ECT would more rapidly improve depression while maintaining hemodynamic stability than ECT with propofol alone. Methods: Institutional ethics approval was obtained, and the use of ketamine in this study was approved by Health Canada. This is a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial that involved ketamine administration at 0.5 mg/kg IV in addition to propofol anesthesia for ECT. The primary outcome was the number of ECT treatments required to achieve a 50% reduction in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Secondary outcomes included the number of ECT treatments required to achieve a 25% reduction in MADRS score, as well as any differences in the Clinical Global Impression Scale for Severity, hemodynamic variables, and seizure duration. Adverse events were recorded for safety assessment. Results: A total of 45 patients completed the study. No difference was found between groups with respect to the primary or secondary outcomes. The ketamine group showed a trend towards a decreased dose of propofol required to achieve adequate anesthesia. No adverse events were reported. Conclusion: Low-dose ketamine does not improve psychiatric outcomes in the setting of propofol-based anesthesia for ECT. Specifically, ketamine did not reduce the number of ECT sessions necessary to achieve a 50 or 25% reduction in MADRS scores. Reassuringly, the fact that no differences in hemodynamic variables or unexpected adverse events occurred suggests that low-dose ketamine may be safely used in this setting should clinical indications warrant its use. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02579642info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAssociação Brasileira de PsiquiatriaBrazilian Journal of Psychiatry v.44 n.1 20222022-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-44462022000100006en10.1590/1516-4446-2020-1705
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Woolsey,Adrianna J.
Nanji,Jalal A.
Moreau,Chantal
Sivapalan,Sudhakar
Bourque,Stephane L.
Ceccherini-Nelli,Alfonso
Gragasin,Ferrante S.
spellingShingle Woolsey,Adrianna J.
Nanji,Jalal A.
Moreau,Chantal
Sivapalan,Sudhakar
Bourque,Stephane L.
Ceccherini-Nelli,Alfonso
Gragasin,Ferrante S.
Low-dose ketamine does not improve the speed of recovery from depression in electroconvulsive therapy: a randomized controlled trial
author_facet Woolsey,Adrianna J.
Nanji,Jalal A.
Moreau,Chantal
Sivapalan,Sudhakar
Bourque,Stephane L.
Ceccherini-Nelli,Alfonso
Gragasin,Ferrante S.
author_sort Woolsey,Adrianna J.
title Low-dose ketamine does not improve the speed of recovery from depression in electroconvulsive therapy: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Low-dose ketamine does not improve the speed of recovery from depression in electroconvulsive therapy: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Low-dose ketamine does not improve the speed of recovery from depression in electroconvulsive therapy: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Low-dose ketamine does not improve the speed of recovery from depression in electroconvulsive therapy: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Low-dose ketamine does not improve the speed of recovery from depression in electroconvulsive therapy: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort low-dose ketamine does not improve the speed of recovery from depression in electroconvulsive therapy: a randomized controlled trial
description Objective: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a well-established therapeutic intervention for major depressive disorder. Recent literature has shown that the anesthetic agent ketamine has some antidepressant properties at low doses and may be an alternative therapy for treatment-resistant major depressive disorder. We hypothesized that the use of low-dose ketamine as an anesthetic adjunct in ECT would more rapidly improve depression while maintaining hemodynamic stability than ECT with propofol alone. Methods: Institutional ethics approval was obtained, and the use of ketamine in this study was approved by Health Canada. This is a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial that involved ketamine administration at 0.5 mg/kg IV in addition to propofol anesthesia for ECT. The primary outcome was the number of ECT treatments required to achieve a 50% reduction in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Secondary outcomes included the number of ECT treatments required to achieve a 25% reduction in MADRS score, as well as any differences in the Clinical Global Impression Scale for Severity, hemodynamic variables, and seizure duration. Adverse events were recorded for safety assessment. Results: A total of 45 patients completed the study. No difference was found between groups with respect to the primary or secondary outcomes. The ketamine group showed a trend towards a decreased dose of propofol required to achieve adequate anesthesia. No adverse events were reported. Conclusion: Low-dose ketamine does not improve psychiatric outcomes in the setting of propofol-based anesthesia for ECT. Specifically, ketamine did not reduce the number of ECT sessions necessary to achieve a 50 or 25% reduction in MADRS scores. Reassuringly, the fact that no differences in hemodynamic variables or unexpected adverse events occurred suggests that low-dose ketamine may be safely used in this setting should clinical indications warrant its use. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02579642
publisher Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria
publishDate 2022
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-44462022000100006
work_keys_str_mv AT woolseyadriannaj lowdoseketaminedoesnotimprovethespeedofrecoveryfromdepressioninelectroconvulsivetherapyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT nanjijalala lowdoseketaminedoesnotimprovethespeedofrecoveryfromdepressioninelectroconvulsivetherapyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT moreauchantal lowdoseketaminedoesnotimprovethespeedofrecoveryfromdepressioninelectroconvulsivetherapyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sivapalansudhakar lowdoseketaminedoesnotimprovethespeedofrecoveryfromdepressioninelectroconvulsivetherapyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bourquestephanel lowdoseketaminedoesnotimprovethespeedofrecoveryfromdepressioninelectroconvulsivetherapyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ceccherininellialfonso lowdoseketaminedoesnotimprovethespeedofrecoveryfromdepressioninelectroconvulsivetherapyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gragasinferrantes lowdoseketaminedoesnotimprovethespeedofrecoveryfromdepressioninelectroconvulsivetherapyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
_version_ 1756422910175608832