Cost-utility analysis of methylphenidate treatment for children and adolescents with ADHD in Brazil

Objective: To perform a cost-utility analysis on the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) with methylphenidate immediate-release (MPH-IR) in children and adolescents from Brazil. Method: A Markov model was constructed to compare MPH-IR vs. no treatment. A 24-week naturalistic study was conducted to collect transition probabilities and utility data. Effectiveness was expressed as quality-adjusted life-years (QALY), and costs reported in 2014 international dollars (I$). The perspective was the Brazilian Unified Health System as payer, and the time horizon was 6 years. Results: Of 171 patients, 73 provided information at baseline, and 56 at week 24. Considering the MPH-IR monthly cost of I$ 38, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of treatment was I$ 9,103/QALY for children and I$ 11,883/QALY for adolescents. In two-way sensitivity analysis, considering one Gross National Product per capita (I$ 11,530) as willingness-to-pay, a cost of no-treatment lower than I$ 45/month would render MPH-IR a cost-saving strategy. Discussion: MPH-IR treatment of children and adolescents is cost-effective for ADHD patients from the Brazilian public health system perspective. Both patients and the healthcare system might benefit from such a strategy. Trial registration number: NCT01705613.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maia,Carlos R., Stella,Steffan F., Wagner,Flavia, Pianca,Thiago G., Krieger,Fernanda V., Cruz,Luciane N., Polanczyk,Guilherme V., Rohde,Luís A., Polanczyk,Carísi A.
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria 2016
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-44462016000100030
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1516-44462016000100030
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1516-444620160001000302016-03-09Cost-utility analysis of methylphenidate treatment for children and adolescents with ADHD in BrazilMaia,Carlos R.Stella,Steffan F.Wagner,FlaviaPianca,Thiago G.Krieger,Fernanda V.Cruz,Luciane N.Polanczyk,Guilherme V.Rohde,Luís A.Polanczyk,Carísi A. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder cost-utility analysis methylphenidate Objective: To perform a cost-utility analysis on the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) with methylphenidate immediate-release (MPH-IR) in children and adolescents from Brazil. Method: A Markov model was constructed to compare MPH-IR vs. no treatment. A 24-week naturalistic study was conducted to collect transition probabilities and utility data. Effectiveness was expressed as quality-adjusted life-years (QALY), and costs reported in 2014 international dollars (I$). The perspective was the Brazilian Unified Health System as payer, and the time horizon was 6 years. Results: Of 171 patients, 73 provided information at baseline, and 56 at week 24. Considering the MPH-IR monthly cost of I$ 38, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of treatment was I$ 9,103/QALY for children and I$ 11,883/QALY for adolescents. In two-way sensitivity analysis, considering one Gross National Product per capita (I$ 11,530) as willingness-to-pay, a cost of no-treatment lower than I$ 45/month would render MPH-IR a cost-saving strategy. Discussion: MPH-IR treatment of children and adolescents is cost-effective for ADHD patients from the Brazilian public health system perspective. Both patients and the healthcare system might benefit from such a strategy. Trial registration number: NCT01705613.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAssociação Brasileira de PsiquiatriaBrazilian Journal of Psychiatry v.38 n.1 20162016-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-44462016000100030en10.1590/1516-4446-2014-1516
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Maia,Carlos R.
Stella,Steffan F.
Wagner,Flavia
Pianca,Thiago G.
Krieger,Fernanda V.
Cruz,Luciane N.
Polanczyk,Guilherme V.
Rohde,Luís A.
Polanczyk,Carísi A.
spellingShingle Maia,Carlos R.
Stella,Steffan F.
Wagner,Flavia
Pianca,Thiago G.
Krieger,Fernanda V.
Cruz,Luciane N.
Polanczyk,Guilherme V.
Rohde,Luís A.
Polanczyk,Carísi A.
Cost-utility analysis of methylphenidate treatment for children and adolescents with ADHD in Brazil
author_facet Maia,Carlos R.
Stella,Steffan F.
Wagner,Flavia
Pianca,Thiago G.
Krieger,Fernanda V.
Cruz,Luciane N.
Polanczyk,Guilherme V.
Rohde,Luís A.
Polanczyk,Carísi A.
author_sort Maia,Carlos R.
title Cost-utility analysis of methylphenidate treatment for children and adolescents with ADHD in Brazil
title_short Cost-utility analysis of methylphenidate treatment for children and adolescents with ADHD in Brazil
title_full Cost-utility analysis of methylphenidate treatment for children and adolescents with ADHD in Brazil
title_fullStr Cost-utility analysis of methylphenidate treatment for children and adolescents with ADHD in Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Cost-utility analysis of methylphenidate treatment for children and adolescents with ADHD in Brazil
title_sort cost-utility analysis of methylphenidate treatment for children and adolescents with adhd in brazil
description Objective: To perform a cost-utility analysis on the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) with methylphenidate immediate-release (MPH-IR) in children and adolescents from Brazil. Method: A Markov model was constructed to compare MPH-IR vs. no treatment. A 24-week naturalistic study was conducted to collect transition probabilities and utility data. Effectiveness was expressed as quality-adjusted life-years (QALY), and costs reported in 2014 international dollars (I$). The perspective was the Brazilian Unified Health System as payer, and the time horizon was 6 years. Results: Of 171 patients, 73 provided information at baseline, and 56 at week 24. Considering the MPH-IR monthly cost of I$ 38, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of treatment was I$ 9,103/QALY for children and I$ 11,883/QALY for adolescents. In two-way sensitivity analysis, considering one Gross National Product per capita (I$ 11,530) as willingness-to-pay, a cost of no-treatment lower than I$ 45/month would render MPH-IR a cost-saving strategy. Discussion: MPH-IR treatment of children and adolescents is cost-effective for ADHD patients from the Brazilian public health system perspective. Both patients and the healthcare system might benefit from such a strategy. Trial registration number: NCT01705613.
publisher Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria
publishDate 2016
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-44462016000100030
work_keys_str_mv AT maiacarlosr costutilityanalysisofmethylphenidatetreatmentforchildrenandadolescentswithadhdinbrazil
AT stellasteffanf costutilityanalysisofmethylphenidatetreatmentforchildrenandadolescentswithadhdinbrazil
AT wagnerflavia costutilityanalysisofmethylphenidatetreatmentforchildrenandadolescentswithadhdinbrazil
AT piancathiagog costutilityanalysisofmethylphenidatetreatmentforchildrenandadolescentswithadhdinbrazil
AT kriegerfernandav costutilityanalysisofmethylphenidatetreatmentforchildrenandadolescentswithadhdinbrazil
AT cruzlucianen costutilityanalysisofmethylphenidatetreatmentforchildrenandadolescentswithadhdinbrazil
AT polanczykguilhermev costutilityanalysisofmethylphenidatetreatmentforchildrenandadolescentswithadhdinbrazil
AT rohdeluisa costutilityanalysisofmethylphenidatetreatmentforchildrenandadolescentswithadhdinbrazil
AT polanczykcarisia costutilityanalysisofmethylphenidatetreatmentforchildrenandadolescentswithadhdinbrazil
_version_ 1756422763779719168