Longitudinal evaluation of the Ophthalmology residents in Brazil: an observational prospective study

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: The longitudinal evaluation of students seems to be a better way to assess their knowledge compared with that of the traditional methods of evaluation, such as modular and final tests. Currently, progress testing is the most consolidated type of longitudinal testing method. However, despite being well consolidated as an assessment tool in medical education, the use of this type of test in residency programs is scarce. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate residents’ knowledge growth regarding residency training and to describe the implementation of a longitudinal evaluation test in ophthalmological residency training across several medical schools in Brazil. Finally, the study aimed to check whether performance in the tests can be used as a predictor of the results of the specialist title test. DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a prospective observational study. This study was conducted using an online platform. METHODS: Online tests were developed following the same pattern as the Brazilian Ophthalmology Council specialist tests. All the residents performed the test simultaneously. The tests were conducted once a year at the end of the school year. RESULTS: A progress test was conducted across 13 services with 259 residents. Our results demonstrated that resident scores improved over the years (P < 0.0001) and had a moderate correlation with the Brazilian Opthalmology Council specialist test (P = 0.0156). CONCLUSION: The progress test can be considered a valuable tool to assess knowledge, meaning their knowledge increased over residency training. In addition, it can be used as a predictor of the result in the specialist title test.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Iyeyasu,Josie Naomi, Cecilio-Fernandes,Dario, Carvalho,Keila Monteiro de
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM 2022
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802022005025204
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1516-31802022005025204
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1516-318020220050252042022-09-30Longitudinal evaluation of the Ophthalmology residents in Brazil: an observational prospective studyIyeyasu,Josie NaomiCecilio-Fernandes,DarioCarvalho,Keila Monteiro de Ophthalmology Education, medical Internship and residency Knowledge assessment Longitudinal evaluation Online test Residency Medical residency ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: The longitudinal evaluation of students seems to be a better way to assess their knowledge compared with that of the traditional methods of evaluation, such as modular and final tests. Currently, progress testing is the most consolidated type of longitudinal testing method. However, despite being well consolidated as an assessment tool in medical education, the use of this type of test in residency programs is scarce. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate residents’ knowledge growth regarding residency training and to describe the implementation of a longitudinal evaluation test in ophthalmological residency training across several medical schools in Brazil. Finally, the study aimed to check whether performance in the tests can be used as a predictor of the results of the specialist title test. DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a prospective observational study. This study was conducted using an online platform. METHODS: Online tests were developed following the same pattern as the Brazilian Ophthalmology Council specialist tests. All the residents performed the test simultaneously. The tests were conducted once a year at the end of the school year. RESULTS: A progress test was conducted across 13 services with 259 residents. Our results demonstrated that resident scores improved over the years (P < 0.0001) and had a moderate correlation with the Brazilian Opthalmology Council specialist test (P = 0.0156). CONCLUSION: The progress test can be considered a valuable tool to assess knowledge, meaning their knowledge increased over residency training. In addition, it can be used as a predictor of the result in the specialist title test.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAssociação Paulista de Medicina - APMSao Paulo Medical Journal n.ahead 20222022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802022005025204en10.1590/1516-3180.2022.0092.r1.01072022
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Iyeyasu,Josie Naomi
Cecilio-Fernandes,Dario
Carvalho,Keila Monteiro de
spellingShingle Iyeyasu,Josie Naomi
Cecilio-Fernandes,Dario
Carvalho,Keila Monteiro de
Longitudinal evaluation of the Ophthalmology residents in Brazil: an observational prospective study
author_facet Iyeyasu,Josie Naomi
Cecilio-Fernandes,Dario
Carvalho,Keila Monteiro de
author_sort Iyeyasu,Josie Naomi
title Longitudinal evaluation of the Ophthalmology residents in Brazil: an observational prospective study
title_short Longitudinal evaluation of the Ophthalmology residents in Brazil: an observational prospective study
title_full Longitudinal evaluation of the Ophthalmology residents in Brazil: an observational prospective study
title_fullStr Longitudinal evaluation of the Ophthalmology residents in Brazil: an observational prospective study
title_full_unstemmed Longitudinal evaluation of the Ophthalmology residents in Brazil: an observational prospective study
title_sort longitudinal evaluation of the ophthalmology residents in brazil: an observational prospective study
description ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: The longitudinal evaluation of students seems to be a better way to assess their knowledge compared with that of the traditional methods of evaluation, such as modular and final tests. Currently, progress testing is the most consolidated type of longitudinal testing method. However, despite being well consolidated as an assessment tool in medical education, the use of this type of test in residency programs is scarce. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate residents’ knowledge growth regarding residency training and to describe the implementation of a longitudinal evaluation test in ophthalmological residency training across several medical schools in Brazil. Finally, the study aimed to check whether performance in the tests can be used as a predictor of the results of the specialist title test. DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a prospective observational study. This study was conducted using an online platform. METHODS: Online tests were developed following the same pattern as the Brazilian Ophthalmology Council specialist tests. All the residents performed the test simultaneously. The tests were conducted once a year at the end of the school year. RESULTS: A progress test was conducted across 13 services with 259 residents. Our results demonstrated that resident scores improved over the years (P < 0.0001) and had a moderate correlation with the Brazilian Opthalmology Council specialist test (P = 0.0156). CONCLUSION: The progress test can be considered a valuable tool to assess knowledge, meaning their knowledge increased over residency training. In addition, it can be used as a predictor of the result in the specialist title test.
publisher Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM
publishDate 2022
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802022005025204
work_keys_str_mv AT iyeyasujosienaomi longitudinalevaluationoftheophthalmologyresidentsinbrazilanobservationalprospectivestudy
AT ceciliofernandesdario longitudinalevaluationoftheophthalmologyresidentsinbrazilanobservationalprospectivestudy
AT carvalhokeilamonteirode longitudinalevaluationoftheophthalmologyresidentsinbrazilanobservationalprospectivestudy
_version_ 1756421772594380800