Citation distribution profile in Brazilian journals of general medicine

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Impact factors are currently the bibliometric index most used for evaluating scientific journals. However, the way in which they are used, for instance concerning the study or journal types analyzed, can markedly interfere with estimate reliability. This study aimed to analyze the citation distribution pattern in three Brazilian journals of general medicine. DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a descriptive study based on numbers of citations of scientific studies published by three Brazilian journals of general medicine. METHODS: The journals analyzed were São Paulo Medical Journal, Clinics and Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira. This survey used data available from the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) platform, from which the total number of papers published in each journal in 2007-2008 and the number of citations of these papers in 2009 were obtained. From these data, the citation distribution was derived and journal impact factors (average number of citations) were estimated. These factors were then compared with those directly available from the ISI Journal of Citation Reports (JCR). RESULTS: Respectively, 134, 203 and 192 papers were published by these journals during the period analyzed. The observed citation distributions were highly skewed, such that many papers had few citations and a small percentage had many citations. It was not possible to identify any specific pattern for the most cited papers or to exactly reproduce the JCR impact factors. CONCLUSION: Use of measures like "impact factors", which characterize citations through averages, does not adequately represent the citation distribution in the journals analyzed.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lustosa,Luiggi Araujo, Chalco,Mario Edmundo Pastrana, Borba,Cecília de Melo, Higa,André Eizo, Almeida,Renan Moritz Varnier Rodrigues
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM 2012
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802012000500008
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1516-31802012000500008
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1516-318020120005000082013-08-12Citation distribution profile in Brazilian journals of general medicineLustosa,Luiggi AraujoChalco,Mario Edmundo PastranaBorba,Cecília de MeloHiga,André EizoAlmeida,Renan Moritz Varnier Rodrigues Journal impact factor Bibliometrics Peer review Systems for evaluation of publications Health research evaluation CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Impact factors are currently the bibliometric index most used for evaluating scientific journals. However, the way in which they are used, for instance concerning the study or journal types analyzed, can markedly interfere with estimate reliability. This study aimed to analyze the citation distribution pattern in three Brazilian journals of general medicine. DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a descriptive study based on numbers of citations of scientific studies published by three Brazilian journals of general medicine. METHODS: The journals analyzed were São Paulo Medical Journal, Clinics and Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira. This survey used data available from the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) platform, from which the total number of papers published in each journal in 2007-2008 and the number of citations of these papers in 2009 were obtained. From these data, the citation distribution was derived and journal impact factors (average number of citations) were estimated. These factors were then compared with those directly available from the ISI Journal of Citation Reports (JCR). RESULTS: Respectively, 134, 203 and 192 papers were published by these journals during the period analyzed. The observed citation distributions were highly skewed, such that many papers had few citations and a small percentage had many citations. It was not possible to identify any specific pattern for the most cited papers or to exactly reproduce the JCR impact factors. CONCLUSION: Use of measures like "impact factors", which characterize citations through averages, does not adequately represent the citation distribution in the journals analyzed.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAssociação Paulista de Medicina - APMSao Paulo Medical Journal v.130 n.5 20122012-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802012000500008en10.1590/S1516-31802012000500008
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Lustosa,Luiggi Araujo
Chalco,Mario Edmundo Pastrana
Borba,Cecília de Melo
Higa,André Eizo
Almeida,Renan Moritz Varnier Rodrigues
spellingShingle Lustosa,Luiggi Araujo
Chalco,Mario Edmundo Pastrana
Borba,Cecília de Melo
Higa,André Eizo
Almeida,Renan Moritz Varnier Rodrigues
Citation distribution profile in Brazilian journals of general medicine
author_facet Lustosa,Luiggi Araujo
Chalco,Mario Edmundo Pastrana
Borba,Cecília de Melo
Higa,André Eizo
Almeida,Renan Moritz Varnier Rodrigues
author_sort Lustosa,Luiggi Araujo
title Citation distribution profile in Brazilian journals of general medicine
title_short Citation distribution profile in Brazilian journals of general medicine
title_full Citation distribution profile in Brazilian journals of general medicine
title_fullStr Citation distribution profile in Brazilian journals of general medicine
title_full_unstemmed Citation distribution profile in Brazilian journals of general medicine
title_sort citation distribution profile in brazilian journals of general medicine
description CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Impact factors are currently the bibliometric index most used for evaluating scientific journals. However, the way in which they are used, for instance concerning the study or journal types analyzed, can markedly interfere with estimate reliability. This study aimed to analyze the citation distribution pattern in three Brazilian journals of general medicine. DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a descriptive study based on numbers of citations of scientific studies published by three Brazilian journals of general medicine. METHODS: The journals analyzed were São Paulo Medical Journal, Clinics and Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira. This survey used data available from the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) platform, from which the total number of papers published in each journal in 2007-2008 and the number of citations of these papers in 2009 were obtained. From these data, the citation distribution was derived and journal impact factors (average number of citations) were estimated. These factors were then compared with those directly available from the ISI Journal of Citation Reports (JCR). RESULTS: Respectively, 134, 203 and 192 papers were published by these journals during the period analyzed. The observed citation distributions were highly skewed, such that many papers had few citations and a small percentage had many citations. It was not possible to identify any specific pattern for the most cited papers or to exactly reproduce the JCR impact factors. CONCLUSION: Use of measures like "impact factors", which characterize citations through averages, does not adequately represent the citation distribution in the journals analyzed.
publisher Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM
publishDate 2012
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802012000500008
work_keys_str_mv AT lustosaluiggiaraujo citationdistributionprofileinbrazilianjournalsofgeneralmedicine
AT chalcomarioedmundopastrana citationdistributionprofileinbrazilianjournalsofgeneralmedicine
AT borbaceciliademelo citationdistributionprofileinbrazilianjournalsofgeneralmedicine
AT higaandreeizo citationdistributionprofileinbrazilianjournalsofgeneralmedicine
AT almeidarenanmoritzvarnierrodrigues citationdistributionprofileinbrazilianjournalsofgeneralmedicine
_version_ 1756421578366648320