Electromyographic biofeedback and visual feedback in myofunctional therapy: usage profile by speech-language-hearing pathologists

ABSTRACT Purpose: to identify the usage profile of mirrors and electromyographic biofeedback to support myofunctional therapy by speech-language-hearing therapists who work with oral-motor function in Brazil. Methods: a quantitative cross-sectional study with an online (SurveyMonkey) questionnaire, which was structured with questions on the use of mirrors and/or electromyographic biofeedback. A descriptive analysis was made, and the Mann-Whitney U test and the chi-square test were applied (p < 0.05). Results: most professionals (23 [82.14%]) used mirrors, whereas only five (17.85%) used electromyographic biofeedback. The electromyographic biofeedback was used at some point with all age groups, to treat mastication and swallowing functions and facial mimics. Dysphagia and facial palsy were regularly or occasionally treated with it. The patients’ perception was significantly associated with the use of either instrument. The electromyographic biofeedback group showed a consensus among patients, while approximately half of the mirror group (12 [52.17%]) were indifferent to its use. Conclusion: the profile showed young adult professionals, who used national equipment. The findings reinforce the need for research on complementary therapeutic procedures in the field of oral-motor functions, particularly, electromyographic biofeedback.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Corrêa,Mariana da Silva, Busanello-Stella,Angela Ruviaro
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: ABRAMO Associação Brasileira de Motricidade Orofacial 2022
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462022000100508
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1516-18462022000100508
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1516-184620220001005082022-06-03Electromyographic biofeedback and visual feedback in myofunctional therapy: usage profile by speech-language-hearing pathologistsCorrêa,Mariana da SilvaBusanello-Stella,Angela Ruviaro Electromyography Mirror Neurons Speech Therapy Feedback, Sensory Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences ABSTRACT Purpose: to identify the usage profile of mirrors and electromyographic biofeedback to support myofunctional therapy by speech-language-hearing therapists who work with oral-motor function in Brazil. Methods: a quantitative cross-sectional study with an online (SurveyMonkey) questionnaire, which was structured with questions on the use of mirrors and/or electromyographic biofeedback. A descriptive analysis was made, and the Mann-Whitney U test and the chi-square test were applied (p < 0.05). Results: most professionals (23 [82.14%]) used mirrors, whereas only five (17.85%) used electromyographic biofeedback. The electromyographic biofeedback was used at some point with all age groups, to treat mastication and swallowing functions and facial mimics. Dysphagia and facial palsy were regularly or occasionally treated with it. The patients’ perception was significantly associated with the use of either instrument. The electromyographic biofeedback group showed a consensus among patients, while approximately half of the mirror group (12 [52.17%]) were indifferent to its use. Conclusion: the profile showed young adult professionals, who used national equipment. The findings reinforce the need for research on complementary therapeutic procedures in the field of oral-motor functions, particularly, electromyographic biofeedback.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessABRAMO Associação Brasileira de Motricidade OrofacialRevista CEFAC v.24 n.1 20222022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462022000100508en10.1590/1982-0216/202224110521
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Corrêa,Mariana da Silva
Busanello-Stella,Angela Ruviaro
spellingShingle Corrêa,Mariana da Silva
Busanello-Stella,Angela Ruviaro
Electromyographic biofeedback and visual feedback in myofunctional therapy: usage profile by speech-language-hearing pathologists
author_facet Corrêa,Mariana da Silva
Busanello-Stella,Angela Ruviaro
author_sort Corrêa,Mariana da Silva
title Electromyographic biofeedback and visual feedback in myofunctional therapy: usage profile by speech-language-hearing pathologists
title_short Electromyographic biofeedback and visual feedback in myofunctional therapy: usage profile by speech-language-hearing pathologists
title_full Electromyographic biofeedback and visual feedback in myofunctional therapy: usage profile by speech-language-hearing pathologists
title_fullStr Electromyographic biofeedback and visual feedback in myofunctional therapy: usage profile by speech-language-hearing pathologists
title_full_unstemmed Electromyographic biofeedback and visual feedback in myofunctional therapy: usage profile by speech-language-hearing pathologists
title_sort electromyographic biofeedback and visual feedback in myofunctional therapy: usage profile by speech-language-hearing pathologists
description ABSTRACT Purpose: to identify the usage profile of mirrors and electromyographic biofeedback to support myofunctional therapy by speech-language-hearing therapists who work with oral-motor function in Brazil. Methods: a quantitative cross-sectional study with an online (SurveyMonkey) questionnaire, which was structured with questions on the use of mirrors and/or electromyographic biofeedback. A descriptive analysis was made, and the Mann-Whitney U test and the chi-square test were applied (p < 0.05). Results: most professionals (23 [82.14%]) used mirrors, whereas only five (17.85%) used electromyographic biofeedback. The electromyographic biofeedback was used at some point with all age groups, to treat mastication and swallowing functions and facial mimics. Dysphagia and facial palsy were regularly or occasionally treated with it. The patients’ perception was significantly associated with the use of either instrument. The electromyographic biofeedback group showed a consensus among patients, while approximately half of the mirror group (12 [52.17%]) were indifferent to its use. Conclusion: the profile showed young adult professionals, who used national equipment. The findings reinforce the need for research on complementary therapeutic procedures in the field of oral-motor functions, particularly, electromyographic biofeedback.
publisher ABRAMO Associação Brasileira de Motricidade Orofacial
publishDate 2022
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462022000100508
work_keys_str_mv AT correamarianadasilva electromyographicbiofeedbackandvisualfeedbackinmyofunctionaltherapyusageprofilebyspeechlanguagehearingpathologists
AT busanellostellaangelaruviaro electromyographicbiofeedbackandvisualfeedbackinmyofunctionaltherapyusageprofilebyspeechlanguagehearingpathologists
_version_ 1756421390575075328