The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: a systematic review of observational studies

Objective: To systematically review the use of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in observational studies. Methods: This study is a systematic review of articles that use the ICF in observational studies. We took into account the observational design papers available in databases such as PubMed, Lilacs and SciELO, published in English and Portuguese from January 2001 to June 2011. We excluded those in which the samples did not comprise individuals, those about children and adolescents, and qualitative methodology articles. After reading the abstracts of 265 identified articles, 65 met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 18 were excluded. The STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) adapted Checklist, with 15 items needed for observational studies, was applied to the 47 remaining articles. Any paper that met 12 of these criteria was included in this systematic review. Results: 29 articles were reviewed. Regarding the ICF application methodology, the checklist was used in 31% of the articles, the core set in 31% and the ICF categories in 31%. In the remaining 7%, it was not possible to define the applied methodology. In most papers (41%), qualifiers were used in their original format. As far as the area of knowledge is concerned, most of the studies were related to Rheumatology (24%) and Orthopedics (21%). Regarding the study design, 83% of the articles used cross-sectional studies. Conclusion: Results indicate a wide scientific production related to ICF over the past 10 years. Different areas of knowledge are involved in the debate on the improvement of information on morbidity. However, there are only a few quantitative epidemiological studies involving the use of ICF. Future studies are needed to improve data related to functioning and disability.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Castaneda,Luciana, Bergmann,Anke, Bahia,Ligia
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva 2014
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-790X2014000200437
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1415-790X2014000200437
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1415-790X20140002004372014-06-03The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: a systematic review of observational studiesCastaneda,LucianaBergmann,AnkeBahia,Ligia International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Chronic disease Review literature as topic Data collection Evidence-based practice Objective: To systematically review the use of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in observational studies. Methods: This study is a systematic review of articles that use the ICF in observational studies. We took into account the observational design papers available in databases such as PubMed, Lilacs and SciELO, published in English and Portuguese from January 2001 to June 2011. We excluded those in which the samples did not comprise individuals, those about children and adolescents, and qualitative methodology articles. After reading the abstracts of 265 identified articles, 65 met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 18 were excluded. The STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) adapted Checklist, with 15 items needed for observational studies, was applied to the 47 remaining articles. Any paper that met 12 of these criteria was included in this systematic review. Results: 29 articles were reviewed. Regarding the ICF application methodology, the checklist was used in 31% of the articles, the core set in 31% and the ICF categories in 31%. In the remaining 7%, it was not possible to define the applied methodology. In most papers (41%), qualifiers were used in their original format. As far as the area of knowledge is concerned, most of the studies were related to Rheumatology (24%) and Orthopedics (21%). Regarding the study design, 83% of the articles used cross-sectional studies. Conclusion: Results indicate a wide scientific production related to ICF over the past 10 years. Different areas of knowledge are involved in the debate on the improvement of information on morbidity. However, there are only a few quantitative epidemiological studies involving the use of ICF. Future studies are needed to improve data related to functioning and disability. info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAssociação Brasileira de Saúde ColetivaRevista Brasileira de Epidemiologia v.17 n.2 20142014-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-790X2014000200437en10.1590/1809-4503201400020012ENG
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Castaneda,Luciana
Bergmann,Anke
Bahia,Ligia
spellingShingle Castaneda,Luciana
Bergmann,Anke
Bahia,Ligia
The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: a systematic review of observational studies
author_facet Castaneda,Luciana
Bergmann,Anke
Bahia,Ligia
author_sort Castaneda,Luciana
title The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: a systematic review of observational studies
title_short The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: a systematic review of observational studies
title_full The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: a systematic review of observational studies
title_fullStr The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: a systematic review of observational studies
title_full_unstemmed The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: a systematic review of observational studies
title_sort international classification of functioning, disability and health: a systematic review of observational studies
description Objective: To systematically review the use of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in observational studies. Methods: This study is a systematic review of articles that use the ICF in observational studies. We took into account the observational design papers available in databases such as PubMed, Lilacs and SciELO, published in English and Portuguese from January 2001 to June 2011. We excluded those in which the samples did not comprise individuals, those about children and adolescents, and qualitative methodology articles. After reading the abstracts of 265 identified articles, 65 met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 18 were excluded. The STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) adapted Checklist, with 15 items needed for observational studies, was applied to the 47 remaining articles. Any paper that met 12 of these criteria was included in this systematic review. Results: 29 articles were reviewed. Regarding the ICF application methodology, the checklist was used in 31% of the articles, the core set in 31% and the ICF categories in 31%. In the remaining 7%, it was not possible to define the applied methodology. In most papers (41%), qualifiers were used in their original format. As far as the area of knowledge is concerned, most of the studies were related to Rheumatology (24%) and Orthopedics (21%). Regarding the study design, 83% of the articles used cross-sectional studies. Conclusion: Results indicate a wide scientific production related to ICF over the past 10 years. Different areas of knowledge are involved in the debate on the improvement of information on morbidity. However, there are only a few quantitative epidemiological studies involving the use of ICF. Future studies are needed to improve data related to functioning and disability.
publisher Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva
publishDate 2014
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-790X2014000200437
work_keys_str_mv AT castanedaluciana theinternationalclassificationoffunctioningdisabilityandhealthasystematicreviewofobservationalstudies
AT bergmannanke theinternationalclassificationoffunctioningdisabilityandhealthasystematicreviewofobservationalstudies
AT bahialigia theinternationalclassificationoffunctioningdisabilityandhealthasystematicreviewofobservationalstudies
AT castanedaluciana internationalclassificationoffunctioningdisabilityandhealthasystematicreviewofobservationalstudies
AT bergmannanke internationalclassificationoffunctioningdisabilityandhealthasystematicreviewofobservationalstudies
AT bahialigia internationalclassificationoffunctioningdisabilityandhealthasystematicreviewofobservationalstudies
_version_ 1756419963555414016