Evidence based practice guidelines for management of low back pain: physical therapy implications

BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) is the most common disorder seen in physical therapy practice. There are several hundred clinical trials on the management of LBP. To summarize these trials, researchers wrote Evidence Based Practice (EBP) guidelines. This article reviewed the implications of EBP guidelines recommendations for physical therapy practice. OBJECTIVES: To review the recommendations for conservative management of LBP published in EBP guidelines since 2002. METHODS: Searches were performed on the following databases: Google web searching engine, Medline, Cochrane Library, and the Guideline Clearing House. Guidelines published in English and addressing conservative management of LBP were included. RESULTS: Thirteen multidisciplinary and three mono-disciplinary guidelines met the inclusion criteria. LBP was triaged into three groups: with red flags, with radiculopathy, or non-specific. Patients without red flags could be safely managed without specialist referral. Patient education was recommended for all patients with LBP. There was an agreement to advise spine manipulation for patients with acute and sub-acute non-specific LBP. There was a consensus to recommend exercises for acute, sub-acute, and chronic LBP. Few guidelines addressed conservative management of LBP with radiculopathy. Overall, the guidelines did not offer specific advice for manipulation (hypomobility or instability) and exercise (stabilization or directional preference). CONCLUSION: Multidisciplinary guidelines focused on primary care and lacked details significant for physical therapy practice. There is a need for mono-disciplinary physical therapy guidelines to improve the balance between evidence and professional relevance.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ladeira,Carlos E.
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia 2011
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-35552011000300004
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1413-35552011000300004
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1413-355520110003000042011-07-28Evidence based practice guidelines for management of low back pain: physical therapy implicationsLadeira,Carlos E. evidence based practice guidelines physical therapy low back pain BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) is the most common disorder seen in physical therapy practice. There are several hundred clinical trials on the management of LBP. To summarize these trials, researchers wrote Evidence Based Practice (EBP) guidelines. This article reviewed the implications of EBP guidelines recommendations for physical therapy practice. OBJECTIVES: To review the recommendations for conservative management of LBP published in EBP guidelines since 2002. METHODS: Searches were performed on the following databases: Google web searching engine, Medline, Cochrane Library, and the Guideline Clearing House. Guidelines published in English and addressing conservative management of LBP were included. RESULTS: Thirteen multidisciplinary and three mono-disciplinary guidelines met the inclusion criteria. LBP was triaged into three groups: with red flags, with radiculopathy, or non-specific. Patients without red flags could be safely managed without specialist referral. Patient education was recommended for all patients with LBP. There was an agreement to advise spine manipulation for patients with acute and sub-acute non-specific LBP. There was a consensus to recommend exercises for acute, sub-acute, and chronic LBP. Few guidelines addressed conservative management of LBP with radiculopathy. Overall, the guidelines did not offer specific advice for manipulation (hypomobility or instability) and exercise (stabilization or directional preference). CONCLUSION: Multidisciplinary guidelines focused on primary care and lacked details significant for physical therapy practice. There is a need for mono-disciplinary physical therapy guidelines to improve the balance between evidence and professional relevance.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAssociação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy v.15 n.3 20112011-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-35552011000300004en10.1590/S1413-35552011000300004
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Ladeira,Carlos E.
spellingShingle Ladeira,Carlos E.
Evidence based practice guidelines for management of low back pain: physical therapy implications
author_facet Ladeira,Carlos E.
author_sort Ladeira,Carlos E.
title Evidence based practice guidelines for management of low back pain: physical therapy implications
title_short Evidence based practice guidelines for management of low back pain: physical therapy implications
title_full Evidence based practice guidelines for management of low back pain: physical therapy implications
title_fullStr Evidence based practice guidelines for management of low back pain: physical therapy implications
title_full_unstemmed Evidence based practice guidelines for management of low back pain: physical therapy implications
title_sort evidence based practice guidelines for management of low back pain: physical therapy implications
description BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) is the most common disorder seen in physical therapy practice. There are several hundred clinical trials on the management of LBP. To summarize these trials, researchers wrote Evidence Based Practice (EBP) guidelines. This article reviewed the implications of EBP guidelines recommendations for physical therapy practice. OBJECTIVES: To review the recommendations for conservative management of LBP published in EBP guidelines since 2002. METHODS: Searches were performed on the following databases: Google web searching engine, Medline, Cochrane Library, and the Guideline Clearing House. Guidelines published in English and addressing conservative management of LBP were included. RESULTS: Thirteen multidisciplinary and three mono-disciplinary guidelines met the inclusion criteria. LBP was triaged into three groups: with red flags, with radiculopathy, or non-specific. Patients without red flags could be safely managed without specialist referral. Patient education was recommended for all patients with LBP. There was an agreement to advise spine manipulation for patients with acute and sub-acute non-specific LBP. There was a consensus to recommend exercises for acute, sub-acute, and chronic LBP. Few guidelines addressed conservative management of LBP with radiculopathy. Overall, the guidelines did not offer specific advice for manipulation (hypomobility or instability) and exercise (stabilization or directional preference). CONCLUSION: Multidisciplinary guidelines focused on primary care and lacked details significant for physical therapy practice. There is a need for mono-disciplinary physical therapy guidelines to improve the balance between evidence and professional relevance.
publisher Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia
publishDate 2011
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-35552011000300004
work_keys_str_mv AT ladeiracarlose evidencebasedpracticeguidelinesformanagementoflowbackpainphysicaltherapyimplications
_version_ 1756413754524827648