Hypoglycemic treatment of diabetic patients in the Emergency Department

Objectives: To analyze if the hypoglycemic therapy prescribed in the Emergency Department adapts to the consensus recommendations available, as well as to assess its clinical impact. Methods: A descriptive observational study, which included patients awaiting hospital admission, who were in the Observation Ward of the Emergency Department and had been previously diagnosed with diabetes mellitus, and were receiving treatment with hypoglycemic drugs at home. The management of antidiabetic treatment and its clinical impact were assessed. Results: 78 patients were included. At admission to the Emergency Department, treatment was modified for 91% of patients, and omitted for 9%. The most prescribed treatment was sliding scale insulin (68%). The treatments prescribed coincided in a 16.7% with the recommendations by the Spanish Society of Emergency Medicine. After intervention by the Pharmacist, the omission descended to 1.3%, and the adaptation to the recommendations increased to 20.5%. Comparing patients whose treatment coincided with the recommendations and those who did not, the clinical impact was respectively: mean glycemia at 24 hours: 138.3 ± 49.5 mg/dL versus 182.7 ± 97.1 mg/dL (p = 0.688); mean rescues with insulin lispro: ± 1.6 versus 1.5 ± 1.8 (p = 0.293); mean units of insulin lispro administered: 4.6 ± 12.7 IU versus 6.6 ± 11.3 IU (p = 0.155). Conclusions: We found antidiabetic prescriptions to have a low adaptation to consensus recommendations. These results are in line with other studies, showing an abuse of sliding scale regimen as single hypoglycemic treatment.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Caballero Requejo,Carmen, Urbieta Sanz,Elena, Trujillano Ruiz,Abel, García-Molina Sáez,Celia, Onteniente Candela,María, Piñera Salmerón,Pascual
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Grupo Aula Médica 2016
Online Access:http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1130-63432016000300004
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1130-63432016000300004
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1130-634320160003000042016-07-19Hypoglycemic treatment of diabetic patients in the Emergency DepartmentCaballero Requejo,CarmenUrbieta Sanz,ElenaTrujillano Ruiz,AbelGarcía-Molina Sáez,CeliaOnteniente Candela,MaríaPiñera Salmerón,Pascual Diabetes mellitus Emergency Department Therapeutic reconciliation Hypoglycemic agents Insulin Objectives: To analyze if the hypoglycemic therapy prescribed in the Emergency Department adapts to the consensus recommendations available, as well as to assess its clinical impact. Methods: A descriptive observational study, which included patients awaiting hospital admission, who were in the Observation Ward of the Emergency Department and had been previously diagnosed with diabetes mellitus, and were receiving treatment with hypoglycemic drugs at home. The management of antidiabetic treatment and its clinical impact were assessed. Results: 78 patients were included. At admission to the Emergency Department, treatment was modified for 91% of patients, and omitted for 9%. The most prescribed treatment was sliding scale insulin (68%). The treatments prescribed coincided in a 16.7% with the recommendations by the Spanish Society of Emergency Medicine. After intervention by the Pharmacist, the omission descended to 1.3%, and the adaptation to the recommendations increased to 20.5%. Comparing patients whose treatment coincided with the recommendations and those who did not, the clinical impact was respectively: mean glycemia at 24 hours: 138.3 ± 49.5 mg/dL versus 182.7 ± 97.1 mg/dL (p = 0.688); mean rescues with insulin lispro: ± 1.6 versus 1.5 ± 1.8 (p = 0.293); mean units of insulin lispro administered: 4.6 ± 12.7 IU versus 6.6 ± 11.3 IU (p = 0.155). Conclusions: We found antidiabetic prescriptions to have a low adaptation to consensus recommendations. These results are in line with other studies, showing an abuse of sliding scale regimen as single hypoglycemic treatment.Grupo Aula MédicaFarmacia Hospitalaria v.40 n.3 20162016-06-01journal articletext/htmlhttp://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1130-63432016000300004en
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country España
countrycode ES
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-es
tag revista
region Europa del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Caballero Requejo,Carmen
Urbieta Sanz,Elena
Trujillano Ruiz,Abel
García-Molina Sáez,Celia
Onteniente Candela,María
Piñera Salmerón,Pascual
spellingShingle Caballero Requejo,Carmen
Urbieta Sanz,Elena
Trujillano Ruiz,Abel
García-Molina Sáez,Celia
Onteniente Candela,María
Piñera Salmerón,Pascual
Hypoglycemic treatment of diabetic patients in the Emergency Department
author_facet Caballero Requejo,Carmen
Urbieta Sanz,Elena
Trujillano Ruiz,Abel
García-Molina Sáez,Celia
Onteniente Candela,María
Piñera Salmerón,Pascual
author_sort Caballero Requejo,Carmen
title Hypoglycemic treatment of diabetic patients in the Emergency Department
title_short Hypoglycemic treatment of diabetic patients in the Emergency Department
title_full Hypoglycemic treatment of diabetic patients in the Emergency Department
title_fullStr Hypoglycemic treatment of diabetic patients in the Emergency Department
title_full_unstemmed Hypoglycemic treatment of diabetic patients in the Emergency Department
title_sort hypoglycemic treatment of diabetic patients in the emergency department
description Objectives: To analyze if the hypoglycemic therapy prescribed in the Emergency Department adapts to the consensus recommendations available, as well as to assess its clinical impact. Methods: A descriptive observational study, which included patients awaiting hospital admission, who were in the Observation Ward of the Emergency Department and had been previously diagnosed with diabetes mellitus, and were receiving treatment with hypoglycemic drugs at home. The management of antidiabetic treatment and its clinical impact were assessed. Results: 78 patients were included. At admission to the Emergency Department, treatment was modified for 91% of patients, and omitted for 9%. The most prescribed treatment was sliding scale insulin (68%). The treatments prescribed coincided in a 16.7% with the recommendations by the Spanish Society of Emergency Medicine. After intervention by the Pharmacist, the omission descended to 1.3%, and the adaptation to the recommendations increased to 20.5%. Comparing patients whose treatment coincided with the recommendations and those who did not, the clinical impact was respectively: mean glycemia at 24 hours: 138.3 ± 49.5 mg/dL versus 182.7 ± 97.1 mg/dL (p = 0.688); mean rescues with insulin lispro: ± 1.6 versus 1.5 ± 1.8 (p = 0.293); mean units of insulin lispro administered: 4.6 ± 12.7 IU versus 6.6 ± 11.3 IU (p = 0.155). Conclusions: We found antidiabetic prescriptions to have a low adaptation to consensus recommendations. These results are in line with other studies, showing an abuse of sliding scale regimen as single hypoglycemic treatment.
publisher Grupo Aula Médica
publishDate 2016
url http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1130-63432016000300004
work_keys_str_mv AT caballerorequejocarmen hypoglycemictreatmentofdiabeticpatientsintheemergencydepartment
AT urbietasanzelena hypoglycemictreatmentofdiabeticpatientsintheemergencydepartment
AT trujillanoruizabel hypoglycemictreatmentofdiabeticpatientsintheemergencydepartment
AT garciamolinasaezcelia hypoglycemictreatmentofdiabeticpatientsintheemergencydepartment
AT ontenientecandelamaria hypoglycemictreatmentofdiabeticpatientsintheemergencydepartment
AT pinerasalmeronpascual hypoglycemictreatmentofdiabeticpatientsintheemergencydepartment
_version_ 1755939072739639296