Analysis of the diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration in patients with a suspected pancreatic malignancy

ABSTRACT Objectives: to determine the diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for suspected pancreatic malignancy. As well as to identify factors that affect the incidence of false-negative cases and evaluate the value of repeated EUS-FNA in patients with inconclusive results. Methods: we retrospectively evaluated the data of patients who underwent EUS-FNA due to a suspected pancreatic malignancy in our hospital from January 2015 to December 2016. Results: a total of 194 EUS-FNA procedures performed and 175 cases were analyzed. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy were 83.4% (151/181), 100% (13/13), 100% (151/151), 30.2% (13/43), and 84.5% (164/194), respectively. The combination of cytological and histological examination significantly increased the diagnostic performance compared to either method alone. The diagnostic sensitivity in metastatic tumors was significantly lower than that for adenocarcinoma. EUS-FNA performed using standard needles combined with the "slow-pull" technique had a lower sensitivity than other methods. According to the multivariate analysis, neither the combination of needle type and suction technique nor final diagnosis were independent factors that affected the diagnostic sensitivity. The sensitivity of repeated EUS-FNA was 50.0% (8/16). Definitive results after a repeated puncture were more likely for pancreatic body and tail masses, heterogeneous lesions and poorly demarcated lesions. However, the difference was not significant. Conclusions: EUS-FNA was accurate for the evaluation of a suspected pancreatic malignancy. Metastatic tumors and the use of a standard needle in combination with the slow-pull technique may increase the incidence of false-negative results. Repeated EUS-FNA has limited value but should be considered for selected cases where the suspicion of malignancy persists.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yang,Lei, IWai,Tomohisa, Kida,Mitsuhiro, Yamauchi,Hiroshi, Okuwaki,Kosuke, Imaizumi,Hiroshi, Kaneko,Tohru, Hasegawa,Rikiya, Miyata,Eiji, Wasaburo,Koizumi
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva 2018
Online Access:http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1130-01082018000900003
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1130-01082018000900003
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1130-010820180009000032019-06-04Analysis of the diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration in patients with a suspected pancreatic malignancyYang,LeiIWai,TomohisaKida,MitsuhiroYamauchi,HiroshiOkuwaki,KosukeImaizumi,HiroshiKaneko,TohruHasegawa,RikiyaMiyata,EijiWasaburo,Koizumi Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) Diagnosis Pancreatic neoplasms ABSTRACT Objectives: to determine the diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for suspected pancreatic malignancy. As well as to identify factors that affect the incidence of false-negative cases and evaluate the value of repeated EUS-FNA in patients with inconclusive results. Methods: we retrospectively evaluated the data of patients who underwent EUS-FNA due to a suspected pancreatic malignancy in our hospital from January 2015 to December 2016. Results: a total of 194 EUS-FNA procedures performed and 175 cases were analyzed. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy were 83.4% (151/181), 100% (13/13), 100% (151/151), 30.2% (13/43), and 84.5% (164/194), respectively. The combination of cytological and histological examination significantly increased the diagnostic performance compared to either method alone. The diagnostic sensitivity in metastatic tumors was significantly lower than that for adenocarcinoma. EUS-FNA performed using standard needles combined with the "slow-pull" technique had a lower sensitivity than other methods. According to the multivariate analysis, neither the combination of needle type and suction technique nor final diagnosis were independent factors that affected the diagnostic sensitivity. The sensitivity of repeated EUS-FNA was 50.0% (8/16). Definitive results after a repeated puncture were more likely for pancreatic body and tail masses, heterogeneous lesions and poorly demarcated lesions. However, the difference was not significant. Conclusions: EUS-FNA was accurate for the evaluation of a suspected pancreatic malignancy. Metastatic tumors and the use of a standard needle in combination with the slow-pull technique may increase the incidence of false-negative results. Repeated EUS-FNA has limited value but should be considered for selected cases where the suspicion of malignancy persists.Sociedad Española de Patología DigestivaRevista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas v.110 n.9 20182018-09-01journal articletext/htmlhttp://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1130-01082018000900003en
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country España
countrycode ES
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-es
tag revista
region Europa del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Yang,Lei
IWai,Tomohisa
Kida,Mitsuhiro
Yamauchi,Hiroshi
Okuwaki,Kosuke
Imaizumi,Hiroshi
Kaneko,Tohru
Hasegawa,Rikiya
Miyata,Eiji
Wasaburo,Koizumi
spellingShingle Yang,Lei
IWai,Tomohisa
Kida,Mitsuhiro
Yamauchi,Hiroshi
Okuwaki,Kosuke
Imaizumi,Hiroshi
Kaneko,Tohru
Hasegawa,Rikiya
Miyata,Eiji
Wasaburo,Koizumi
Analysis of the diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration in patients with a suspected pancreatic malignancy
author_facet Yang,Lei
IWai,Tomohisa
Kida,Mitsuhiro
Yamauchi,Hiroshi
Okuwaki,Kosuke
Imaizumi,Hiroshi
Kaneko,Tohru
Hasegawa,Rikiya
Miyata,Eiji
Wasaburo,Koizumi
author_sort Yang,Lei
title Analysis of the diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration in patients with a suspected pancreatic malignancy
title_short Analysis of the diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration in patients with a suspected pancreatic malignancy
title_full Analysis of the diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration in patients with a suspected pancreatic malignancy
title_fullStr Analysis of the diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration in patients with a suspected pancreatic malignancy
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of the diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration in patients with a suspected pancreatic malignancy
title_sort analysis of the diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration in patients with a suspected pancreatic malignancy
description ABSTRACT Objectives: to determine the diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for suspected pancreatic malignancy. As well as to identify factors that affect the incidence of false-negative cases and evaluate the value of repeated EUS-FNA in patients with inconclusive results. Methods: we retrospectively evaluated the data of patients who underwent EUS-FNA due to a suspected pancreatic malignancy in our hospital from January 2015 to December 2016. Results: a total of 194 EUS-FNA procedures performed and 175 cases were analyzed. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy were 83.4% (151/181), 100% (13/13), 100% (151/151), 30.2% (13/43), and 84.5% (164/194), respectively. The combination of cytological and histological examination significantly increased the diagnostic performance compared to either method alone. The diagnostic sensitivity in metastatic tumors was significantly lower than that for adenocarcinoma. EUS-FNA performed using standard needles combined with the "slow-pull" technique had a lower sensitivity than other methods. According to the multivariate analysis, neither the combination of needle type and suction technique nor final diagnosis were independent factors that affected the diagnostic sensitivity. The sensitivity of repeated EUS-FNA was 50.0% (8/16). Definitive results after a repeated puncture were more likely for pancreatic body and tail masses, heterogeneous lesions and poorly demarcated lesions. However, the difference was not significant. Conclusions: EUS-FNA was accurate for the evaluation of a suspected pancreatic malignancy. Metastatic tumors and the use of a standard needle in combination with the slow-pull technique may increase the incidence of false-negative results. Repeated EUS-FNA has limited value but should be considered for selected cases where the suspicion of malignancy persists.
publisher Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva
publishDate 2018
url http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1130-01082018000900003
work_keys_str_mv AT yanglei analysisofthediagnosticyieldofendoscopicultrasonographyguidedfineneedleaspirationinpatientswithasuspectedpancreaticmalignancy
AT iwaitomohisa analysisofthediagnosticyieldofendoscopicultrasonographyguidedfineneedleaspirationinpatientswithasuspectedpancreaticmalignancy
AT kidamitsuhiro analysisofthediagnosticyieldofendoscopicultrasonographyguidedfineneedleaspirationinpatientswithasuspectedpancreaticmalignancy
AT yamauchihiroshi analysisofthediagnosticyieldofendoscopicultrasonographyguidedfineneedleaspirationinpatientswithasuspectedpancreaticmalignancy
AT okuwakikosuke analysisofthediagnosticyieldofendoscopicultrasonographyguidedfineneedleaspirationinpatientswithasuspectedpancreaticmalignancy
AT imaizumihiroshi analysisofthediagnosticyieldofendoscopicultrasonographyguidedfineneedleaspirationinpatientswithasuspectedpancreaticmalignancy
AT kanekotohru analysisofthediagnosticyieldofendoscopicultrasonographyguidedfineneedleaspirationinpatientswithasuspectedpancreaticmalignancy
AT hasegawarikiya analysisofthediagnosticyieldofendoscopicultrasonographyguidedfineneedleaspirationinpatientswithasuspectedpancreaticmalignancy
AT miyataeiji analysisofthediagnosticyieldofendoscopicultrasonographyguidedfineneedleaspirationinpatientswithasuspectedpancreaticmalignancy
AT wasaburokoizumi analysisofthediagnosticyieldofendoscopicultrasonographyguidedfineneedleaspirationinpatientswithasuspectedpancreaticmalignancy
_version_ 1755938792235073536