Meta-analysis of the association between appendiceal orifice inflammation and appendectomy and ulcerative colitis

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between appendiceal orifice inflammation (AOI) and appendectomy and ulcerative colitis (UC) by a meta-analysis. Methods: Databases were thoroughly searched for studies on AOI and UC up to January 2016. Three comparisons were performed: a) whether the previous appendectomy was a risk factor of UC; b) influence of appendectomy on UC courses; c) influence of AOI on UC severity. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were the effects sizes. The merging of results and publication bias assessment were performed by using RevMan 5.3. Sensitivity analysis was conducted using Stata 12.0. Results: Nineteen studies were selected in the present study. Results of comparison I showed that appendectomy was a protective factor of UC (OR = 0.44; 95% CI [0.30, 0.64]). Comparison II indicated appendectomy had no significant influence in the courses of UC (proctitis: OR = 1.03, 95% CI [0.74, 1.42]; left-sided colitis: OR = 1.01, 95% CI [0.73, 1.39]; pancolitis: OR = 0.92, 95% CI [0.59, 1.43]; colectomy: OR = 1.38, 95% CI [0.62, 3.04]). Comparison III indicated UC combined with AOI did not affect the courses of UC (proctitis: OR = 1.15, 95% CI [0.67, 1.98]; left-sided colitis: OR = 1.14, 95% CI [0.24, 5.42]; colectomy: OR = 0.36, 95% CI [0.10, 1.23]). Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robust of the results in the present study. Conclusion: In conclusion, this meta-analysis indicated appendectomy can reduce the risk of UC. But appendectomy or AOI had no influence on the severity of the disease and the effect of surgical treatment.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Deng,Peng, Wu,Junchao
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva 2016
Online Access:http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1130-01082016000700004
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1130-01082016000700004
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1130-010820160007000042016-08-23Meta-analysis of the association between appendiceal orifice inflammation and appendectomy and ulcerative colitisDeng,PengWu,Junchao Appendiceal orifice Punctiform erosion Ulcerative colitis Objective: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between appendiceal orifice inflammation (AOI) and appendectomy and ulcerative colitis (UC) by a meta-analysis. Methods: Databases were thoroughly searched for studies on AOI and UC up to January 2016. Three comparisons were performed: a) whether the previous appendectomy was a risk factor of UC; b) influence of appendectomy on UC courses; c) influence of AOI on UC severity. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were the effects sizes. The merging of results and publication bias assessment were performed by using RevMan 5.3. Sensitivity analysis was conducted using Stata 12.0. Results: Nineteen studies were selected in the present study. Results of comparison I showed that appendectomy was a protective factor of UC (OR = 0.44; 95% CI [0.30, 0.64]). Comparison II indicated appendectomy had no significant influence in the courses of UC (proctitis: OR = 1.03, 95% CI [0.74, 1.42]; left-sided colitis: OR = 1.01, 95% CI [0.73, 1.39]; pancolitis: OR = 0.92, 95% CI [0.59, 1.43]; colectomy: OR = 1.38, 95% CI [0.62, 3.04]). Comparison III indicated UC combined with AOI did not affect the courses of UC (proctitis: OR = 1.15, 95% CI [0.67, 1.98]; left-sided colitis: OR = 1.14, 95% CI [0.24, 5.42]; colectomy: OR = 0.36, 95% CI [0.10, 1.23]). Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robust of the results in the present study. Conclusion: In conclusion, this meta-analysis indicated appendectomy can reduce the risk of UC. But appendectomy or AOI had no influence on the severity of the disease and the effect of surgical treatment.Sociedad Española de Patología DigestivaRevista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas v.108 n.7 20162016-07-01journal articletext/htmlhttp://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1130-01082016000700004en
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country España
countrycode ES
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-es
tag revista
region Europa del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Deng,Peng
Wu,Junchao
spellingShingle Deng,Peng
Wu,Junchao
Meta-analysis of the association between appendiceal orifice inflammation and appendectomy and ulcerative colitis
author_facet Deng,Peng
Wu,Junchao
author_sort Deng,Peng
title Meta-analysis of the association between appendiceal orifice inflammation and appendectomy and ulcerative colitis
title_short Meta-analysis of the association between appendiceal orifice inflammation and appendectomy and ulcerative colitis
title_full Meta-analysis of the association between appendiceal orifice inflammation and appendectomy and ulcerative colitis
title_fullStr Meta-analysis of the association between appendiceal orifice inflammation and appendectomy and ulcerative colitis
title_full_unstemmed Meta-analysis of the association between appendiceal orifice inflammation and appendectomy and ulcerative colitis
title_sort meta-analysis of the association between appendiceal orifice inflammation and appendectomy and ulcerative colitis
description Objective: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between appendiceal orifice inflammation (AOI) and appendectomy and ulcerative colitis (UC) by a meta-analysis. Methods: Databases were thoroughly searched for studies on AOI and UC up to January 2016. Three comparisons were performed: a) whether the previous appendectomy was a risk factor of UC; b) influence of appendectomy on UC courses; c) influence of AOI on UC severity. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were the effects sizes. The merging of results and publication bias assessment were performed by using RevMan 5.3. Sensitivity analysis was conducted using Stata 12.0. Results: Nineteen studies were selected in the present study. Results of comparison I showed that appendectomy was a protective factor of UC (OR = 0.44; 95% CI [0.30, 0.64]). Comparison II indicated appendectomy had no significant influence in the courses of UC (proctitis: OR = 1.03, 95% CI [0.74, 1.42]; left-sided colitis: OR = 1.01, 95% CI [0.73, 1.39]; pancolitis: OR = 0.92, 95% CI [0.59, 1.43]; colectomy: OR = 1.38, 95% CI [0.62, 3.04]). Comparison III indicated UC combined with AOI did not affect the courses of UC (proctitis: OR = 1.15, 95% CI [0.67, 1.98]; left-sided colitis: OR = 1.14, 95% CI [0.24, 5.42]; colectomy: OR = 0.36, 95% CI [0.10, 1.23]). Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robust of the results in the present study. Conclusion: In conclusion, this meta-analysis indicated appendectomy can reduce the risk of UC. But appendectomy or AOI had no influence on the severity of the disease and the effect of surgical treatment.
publisher Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva
publishDate 2016
url http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1130-01082016000700004
work_keys_str_mv AT dengpeng metaanalysisoftheassociationbetweenappendicealorificeinflammationandappendectomyandulcerativecolitis
AT wujunchao metaanalysisoftheassociationbetweenappendicealorificeinflammationandappendectomyandulcerativecolitis
_version_ 1755938716911665152