Colorectal cancer and its delayed diagnosis: have we improved in the past 25 years?

Objective: to determine the current delay in diagnosing colorectal cancer (CRC) and establish whether there has been any improvement in the past 25 years in the same healthcare setting using the same methods. Patients and method: 152 patients undergoing surgery at our unit were personally interviewed during their hospital stay to determine the delay incurred for the diagnosis and treatment of their CRC. SPSS software was used for univariate and multivariate analysis of the data obtained. Results: the study population was comprised of 152 patients of mean age 71 years (SD 10; range 36 to 90 years), 82 men and 70 women (53.9 and 46.1% respectively; p &gt; 0.05). The diagnostic delay for CRC at our unit currently runs at 7.28 months despite the fact that in 58% of patients the disease produced obvious symptoms such as rectal bleeding. Although this delay in diagnosis is reduced over that observed 25 years ago, the difference is statistically not significant in terms of both doctor-attributed or patient-attributed delay (doctor-attributed delay was 3.28 months in 1985 versus 1.89 at present and patient-attributed delay was 3.18 months versus today's 2.75; p &gt; 0.05). Unlike the situation 25 years ago, no link was detected between diagnostic delay and tumor stage. Paradoxically, stage D disease was diagnosed earlier (at 5.71 months) than stage A disease (at 11.16 months) (p < 0.05). Conclusion: the diagnostic delay for CRC at our centre is 7.28 months. This delay is excessive for a disease that produces evident symptoms in 90% of patients. Over the last 25 years little improvement has been noted in the overall delay in diagnosing CRC, although the delay attributed to the care provider has significantly improved. No relationship was detected between diagnostic delay and disease stage upon diagnosis. We feel the high prevalence of CRC, the failure of campaigns to increase awareness of early symptoms and no real improvement in its prognosis justify the introduction of large-scale colonoscopy screening for this disease.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cerdán-Santacruz,Carlos, Cano-Valderrama,Óscar, Cárdenas-Crespo,Sofía, Torres-García,Antonio José, Cerdán-Miguel,Javier
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva 2011
Online Access:http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1130-01082011000900004
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1130-01082011000900004
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1130-010820110009000042012-01-30Colorectal cancer and its delayed diagnosis: have we improved in the past 25 years?Cerdán-Santacruz,CarlosCano-Valderrama,ÓscarCárdenas-Crespo,SofíaTorres-García,Antonio JoséCerdán-Miguel,Javier Colorectal cancer Diagnostic delay Prognosis Screening Objective: to determine the current delay in diagnosing colorectal cancer (CRC) and establish whether there has been any improvement in the past 25 years in the same healthcare setting using the same methods. Patients and method: 152 patients undergoing surgery at our unit were personally interviewed during their hospital stay to determine the delay incurred for the diagnosis and treatment of their CRC. SPSS software was used for univariate and multivariate analysis of the data obtained. Results: the study population was comprised of 152 patients of mean age 71 years (SD 10; range 36 to 90 years), 82 men and 70 women (53.9 and 46.1% respectively; p &gt; 0.05). The diagnostic delay for CRC at our unit currently runs at 7.28 months despite the fact that in 58% of patients the disease produced obvious symptoms such as rectal bleeding. Although this delay in diagnosis is reduced over that observed 25 years ago, the difference is statistically not significant in terms of both doctor-attributed or patient-attributed delay (doctor-attributed delay was 3.28 months in 1985 versus 1.89 at present and patient-attributed delay was 3.18 months versus today's 2.75; p &gt; 0.05). Unlike the situation 25 years ago, no link was detected between diagnostic delay and tumor stage. Paradoxically, stage D disease was diagnosed earlier (at 5.71 months) than stage A disease (at 11.16 months) (p < 0.05). Conclusion: the diagnostic delay for CRC at our centre is 7.28 months. This delay is excessive for a disease that produces evident symptoms in 90% of patients. Over the last 25 years little improvement has been noted in the overall delay in diagnosing CRC, although the delay attributed to the care provider has significantly improved. No relationship was detected between diagnostic delay and disease stage upon diagnosis. We feel the high prevalence of CRC, the failure of campaigns to increase awareness of early symptoms and no real improvement in its prognosis justify the introduction of large-scale colonoscopy screening for this disease.Sociedad Española de Patología DigestivaRevista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas v.103 n.9 20112011-09-01journal articletext/htmlhttp://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1130-01082011000900004en
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country España
countrycode ES
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-es
tag revista
region Europa del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Cerdán-Santacruz,Carlos
Cano-Valderrama,Óscar
Cárdenas-Crespo,Sofía
Torres-García,Antonio José
Cerdán-Miguel,Javier
spellingShingle Cerdán-Santacruz,Carlos
Cano-Valderrama,Óscar
Cárdenas-Crespo,Sofía
Torres-García,Antonio José
Cerdán-Miguel,Javier
Colorectal cancer and its delayed diagnosis: have we improved in the past 25 years?
author_facet Cerdán-Santacruz,Carlos
Cano-Valderrama,Óscar
Cárdenas-Crespo,Sofía
Torres-García,Antonio José
Cerdán-Miguel,Javier
author_sort Cerdán-Santacruz,Carlos
title Colorectal cancer and its delayed diagnosis: have we improved in the past 25 years?
title_short Colorectal cancer and its delayed diagnosis: have we improved in the past 25 years?
title_full Colorectal cancer and its delayed diagnosis: have we improved in the past 25 years?
title_fullStr Colorectal cancer and its delayed diagnosis: have we improved in the past 25 years?
title_full_unstemmed Colorectal cancer and its delayed diagnosis: have we improved in the past 25 years?
title_sort colorectal cancer and its delayed diagnosis: have we improved in the past 25 years?
description Objective: to determine the current delay in diagnosing colorectal cancer (CRC) and establish whether there has been any improvement in the past 25 years in the same healthcare setting using the same methods. Patients and method: 152 patients undergoing surgery at our unit were personally interviewed during their hospital stay to determine the delay incurred for the diagnosis and treatment of their CRC. SPSS software was used for univariate and multivariate analysis of the data obtained. Results: the study population was comprised of 152 patients of mean age 71 years (SD 10; range 36 to 90 years), 82 men and 70 women (53.9 and 46.1% respectively; p &gt; 0.05). The diagnostic delay for CRC at our unit currently runs at 7.28 months despite the fact that in 58% of patients the disease produced obvious symptoms such as rectal bleeding. Although this delay in diagnosis is reduced over that observed 25 years ago, the difference is statistically not significant in terms of both doctor-attributed or patient-attributed delay (doctor-attributed delay was 3.28 months in 1985 versus 1.89 at present and patient-attributed delay was 3.18 months versus today's 2.75; p &gt; 0.05). Unlike the situation 25 years ago, no link was detected between diagnostic delay and tumor stage. Paradoxically, stage D disease was diagnosed earlier (at 5.71 months) than stage A disease (at 11.16 months) (p < 0.05). Conclusion: the diagnostic delay for CRC at our centre is 7.28 months. This delay is excessive for a disease that produces evident symptoms in 90% of patients. Over the last 25 years little improvement has been noted in the overall delay in diagnosing CRC, although the delay attributed to the care provider has significantly improved. No relationship was detected between diagnostic delay and disease stage upon diagnosis. We feel the high prevalence of CRC, the failure of campaigns to increase awareness of early symptoms and no real improvement in its prognosis justify the introduction of large-scale colonoscopy screening for this disease.
publisher Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva
publishDate 2011
url http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1130-01082011000900004
work_keys_str_mv AT cerdansantacruzcarlos colorectalcanceranditsdelayeddiagnosishaveweimprovedinthepast25years
AT canovalderramaoscar colorectalcanceranditsdelayeddiagnosishaveweimprovedinthepast25years
AT cardenascresposofia colorectalcanceranditsdelayeddiagnosishaveweimprovedinthepast25years
AT torresgarciaantoniojose colorectalcanceranditsdelayeddiagnosishaveweimprovedinthepast25years
AT cerdanmigueljavier colorectalcanceranditsdelayeddiagnosishaveweimprovedinthepast25years
_version_ 1755938600919236608