Restorative proctocolectomy with an ileoanal pouch: the role of laparoscopy

Objectives: the aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate early experience with laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy by analyzing the perioperative results of surgical treatment. Patients and methods: seven major surgeries were performed in six patients with familial adenomatous polyposis and ulcerative colitis. All procedures were performed under laparoscopy at our third-level hospital from June 2003 to October 2004. Results: mean surgical time was 287.5 ± 80.7 min, and median blood loss was 300 ± 249.0 cc. There were no conversions; return of peristalsis began at 32 ± 12.4 h; average time to first oral intake was 64.0 ± 32.8 h, and mean duration of hospital stay was 9.3 ± 1.2 days. There was one case of perineal sepsis due to ileal pouch-anal anastomotic leakage, which was successfully treated with oral intake restriction, parenteral nutrition, and intra-rectal drainage. The most common postoperative complication was postoperative ileus. Conclusions: we believe that the laparoscopic approach to restorative proctocolectomy may be considerably improved in our center. Particular aspects for improvement include efforts to achieve lower operating and hospitalization times to equate our results with those reported by multicenter studies for laparoscopic colon cancer surgery. In our opinion, learning and further training opportunities should be encouraged to improve surgeon experience in the field of laparoscopy, preferably at centers specializing in restorative proctocolectomy.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Delgado Plasencia,L., Arteaga González,I., López-Tomassetti Fernández,E. M., Martín Malagón,A., Díaz Luis,H., Carrillo Pallarés,A.
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva 2006
Online Access:http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1130-01082006000600003
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1130-01082006000600003
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1130-010820060006000032009-07-14Restorative proctocolectomy with an ileoanal pouch: the role of laparoscopyDelgado Plasencia,L.Arteaga González,I.López-Tomassetti Fernández,E. M.Martín Malagón,A.Díaz Luis,H.Carrillo Pallarés,A. Restorative proctocolectomy Ileoanal pouch Laparoscopy Surgery Objectives: the aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate early experience with laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy by analyzing the perioperative results of surgical treatment. Patients and methods: seven major surgeries were performed in six patients with familial adenomatous polyposis and ulcerative colitis. All procedures were performed under laparoscopy at our third-level hospital from June 2003 to October 2004. Results: mean surgical time was 287.5 ± 80.7 min, and median blood loss was 300 ± 249.0 cc. There were no conversions; return of peristalsis began at 32 ± 12.4 h; average time to first oral intake was 64.0 ± 32.8 h, and mean duration of hospital stay was 9.3 ± 1.2 days. There was one case of perineal sepsis due to ileal pouch-anal anastomotic leakage, which was successfully treated with oral intake restriction, parenteral nutrition, and intra-rectal drainage. The most common postoperative complication was postoperative ileus. Conclusions: we believe that the laparoscopic approach to restorative proctocolectomy may be considerably improved in our center. Particular aspects for improvement include efforts to achieve lower operating and hospitalization times to equate our results with those reported by multicenter studies for laparoscopic colon cancer surgery. In our opinion, learning and further training opportunities should be encouraged to improve surgeon experience in the field of laparoscopy, preferably at centers specializing in restorative proctocolectomy.Sociedad Española de Patología DigestivaRevista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas v.98 n.6 20062006-06-01journal articletext/htmlhttp://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1130-01082006000600003en
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country España
countrycode ES
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-es
tag revista
region Europa del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Delgado Plasencia,L.
Arteaga González,I.
López-Tomassetti Fernández,E. M.
Martín Malagón,A.
Díaz Luis,H.
Carrillo Pallarés,A.
spellingShingle Delgado Plasencia,L.
Arteaga González,I.
López-Tomassetti Fernández,E. M.
Martín Malagón,A.
Díaz Luis,H.
Carrillo Pallarés,A.
Restorative proctocolectomy with an ileoanal pouch: the role of laparoscopy
author_facet Delgado Plasencia,L.
Arteaga González,I.
López-Tomassetti Fernández,E. M.
Martín Malagón,A.
Díaz Luis,H.
Carrillo Pallarés,A.
author_sort Delgado Plasencia,L.
title Restorative proctocolectomy with an ileoanal pouch: the role of laparoscopy
title_short Restorative proctocolectomy with an ileoanal pouch: the role of laparoscopy
title_full Restorative proctocolectomy with an ileoanal pouch: the role of laparoscopy
title_fullStr Restorative proctocolectomy with an ileoanal pouch: the role of laparoscopy
title_full_unstemmed Restorative proctocolectomy with an ileoanal pouch: the role of laparoscopy
title_sort restorative proctocolectomy with an ileoanal pouch: the role of laparoscopy
description Objectives: the aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate early experience with laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy by analyzing the perioperative results of surgical treatment. Patients and methods: seven major surgeries were performed in six patients with familial adenomatous polyposis and ulcerative colitis. All procedures were performed under laparoscopy at our third-level hospital from June 2003 to October 2004. Results: mean surgical time was 287.5 ± 80.7 min, and median blood loss was 300 ± 249.0 cc. There were no conversions; return of peristalsis began at 32 ± 12.4 h; average time to first oral intake was 64.0 ± 32.8 h, and mean duration of hospital stay was 9.3 ± 1.2 days. There was one case of perineal sepsis due to ileal pouch-anal anastomotic leakage, which was successfully treated with oral intake restriction, parenteral nutrition, and intra-rectal drainage. The most common postoperative complication was postoperative ileus. Conclusions: we believe that the laparoscopic approach to restorative proctocolectomy may be considerably improved in our center. Particular aspects for improvement include efforts to achieve lower operating and hospitalization times to equate our results with those reported by multicenter studies for laparoscopic colon cancer surgery. In our opinion, learning and further training opportunities should be encouraged to improve surgeon experience in the field of laparoscopy, preferably at centers specializing in restorative proctocolectomy.
publisher Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva
publishDate 2006
url http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1130-01082006000600003
work_keys_str_mv AT delgadoplasencial restorativeproctocolectomywithanileoanalpouchtheroleoflaparoscopy
AT arteagagonzalezi restorativeproctocolectomywithanileoanalpouchtheroleoflaparoscopy
AT lopeztomassettifernandezem restorativeproctocolectomywithanileoanalpouchtheroleoflaparoscopy
AT martinmalagona restorativeproctocolectomywithanileoanalpouchtheroleoflaparoscopy
AT diazluish restorativeproctocolectomywithanileoanalpouchtheroleoflaparoscopy
AT carrillopallaresa restorativeproctocolectomywithanileoanalpouchtheroleoflaparoscopy
_version_ 1755938456034344960