Surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a comparative study between the open and laparoscopic approaches

Objective: given the demonstrated effectiveness of medical treatment together with the eminent acceptance of the laparoscopic approach, the indications of surgery in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are currently subject to continuous controversy. To participate in this debate, we have the following work hypothesis: "The results of the 360º short and floppy laparoscopic fundoplication are superior to those of open surgery". Clinical design: prospective, clinical, non-randomized study. Patients: our work was developed between November 1991 and December 1998 by means of a prospective, non-randomized clinical rehearsal with two groups of patients: -Group I (n = 75): 360° short and floppy laparoscopic fundoplication in Hospital Dr. Peset, Valencia (Spain). -Group II (n = 28): 360° short and floppy, open fundoplication in Hospital General, Valencia (Spain). We evaluated the preoperative parameters and found no differences, which allows us to know that both groups were comparable. Results: the analysis of peroperative results (morbidity and surgical time) and of clinical follow-up (every three months and later annually) and instrumental follow-up (TEGD, upper digestive endoscopy, pHmetry and manometry) show no differences, while the postoperative analysis shows statistically significant (s.s.) differences regarding recovery (pain, oral intake, hospital stay and return to previous activities). Conclusions: the results of the 360° short and floppy laparoscopic fundoplication are similar to those of the open approach, but favor the former approach with a better postoperative tolerance.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Trullenque Juan,R., Torres Sánchez,T., Martí Martínez,E., Martínez Abad,M., Trullenque Peris,R., Delgado Gomis,F.
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva 2005
Online Access:http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1130-01082005000500005
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1130-01082005000500005
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1130-010820050005000052006-08-24Surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a comparative study between the open and laparoscopic approachesTrullenque Juan,R.Torres Sánchez,T.Martí Martínez,E.Martínez Abad,M.Trullenque Peris,R.Delgado Gomis,F. Gastroesophageal reflux disease Laparoscopic surgery Open surgery Objective: given the demonstrated effectiveness of medical treatment together with the eminent acceptance of the laparoscopic approach, the indications of surgery in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are currently subject to continuous controversy. To participate in this debate, we have the following work hypothesis: "The results of the 360º short and floppy laparoscopic fundoplication are superior to those of open surgery". Clinical design: prospective, clinical, non-randomized study. Patients: our work was developed between November 1991 and December 1998 by means of a prospective, non-randomized clinical rehearsal with two groups of patients: -Group I (n = 75): 360° short and floppy laparoscopic fundoplication in Hospital Dr. Peset, Valencia (Spain). -Group II (n = 28): 360° short and floppy, open fundoplication in Hospital General, Valencia (Spain). We evaluated the preoperative parameters and found no differences, which allows us to know that both groups were comparable. Results: the analysis of peroperative results (morbidity and surgical time) and of clinical follow-up (every three months and later annually) and instrumental follow-up (TEGD, upper digestive endoscopy, pHmetry and manometry) show no differences, while the postoperative analysis shows statistically significant (s.s.) differences regarding recovery (pain, oral intake, hospital stay and return to previous activities). Conclusions: the results of the 360° short and floppy laparoscopic fundoplication are similar to those of the open approach, but favor the former approach with a better postoperative tolerance.Sociedad Española de Patología DigestivaRevista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas v.97 n.5 20052005-05-01journal articletext/htmlhttp://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1130-01082005000500005en
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country España
countrycode ES
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-es
tag revista
region Europa del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Trullenque Juan,R.
Torres Sánchez,T.
Martí Martínez,E.
Martínez Abad,M.
Trullenque Peris,R.
Delgado Gomis,F.
spellingShingle Trullenque Juan,R.
Torres Sánchez,T.
Martí Martínez,E.
Martínez Abad,M.
Trullenque Peris,R.
Delgado Gomis,F.
Surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a comparative study between the open and laparoscopic approaches
author_facet Trullenque Juan,R.
Torres Sánchez,T.
Martí Martínez,E.
Martínez Abad,M.
Trullenque Peris,R.
Delgado Gomis,F.
author_sort Trullenque Juan,R.
title Surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a comparative study between the open and laparoscopic approaches
title_short Surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a comparative study between the open and laparoscopic approaches
title_full Surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a comparative study between the open and laparoscopic approaches
title_fullStr Surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a comparative study between the open and laparoscopic approaches
title_full_unstemmed Surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a comparative study between the open and laparoscopic approaches
title_sort surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a comparative study between the open and laparoscopic approaches
description Objective: given the demonstrated effectiveness of medical treatment together with the eminent acceptance of the laparoscopic approach, the indications of surgery in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are currently subject to continuous controversy. To participate in this debate, we have the following work hypothesis: "The results of the 360º short and floppy laparoscopic fundoplication are superior to those of open surgery". Clinical design: prospective, clinical, non-randomized study. Patients: our work was developed between November 1991 and December 1998 by means of a prospective, non-randomized clinical rehearsal with two groups of patients: -Group I (n = 75): 360° short and floppy laparoscopic fundoplication in Hospital Dr. Peset, Valencia (Spain). -Group II (n = 28): 360° short and floppy, open fundoplication in Hospital General, Valencia (Spain). We evaluated the preoperative parameters and found no differences, which allows us to know that both groups were comparable. Results: the analysis of peroperative results (morbidity and surgical time) and of clinical follow-up (every three months and later annually) and instrumental follow-up (TEGD, upper digestive endoscopy, pHmetry and manometry) show no differences, while the postoperative analysis shows statistically significant (s.s.) differences regarding recovery (pain, oral intake, hospital stay and return to previous activities). Conclusions: the results of the 360° short and floppy laparoscopic fundoplication are similar to those of the open approach, but favor the former approach with a better postoperative tolerance.
publisher Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva
publishDate 2005
url http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1130-01082005000500005
work_keys_str_mv AT trullenquejuanr surgeryforgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseacomparativestudybetweentheopenandlaparoscopicapproaches
AT torressanchezt surgeryforgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseacomparativestudybetweentheopenandlaparoscopicapproaches
AT martimartineze surgeryforgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseacomparativestudybetweentheopenandlaparoscopicapproaches
AT martinezabadm surgeryforgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseacomparativestudybetweentheopenandlaparoscopicapproaches
AT trullenqueperisr surgeryforgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseacomparativestudybetweentheopenandlaparoscopicapproaches
AT delgadogomisf surgeryforgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseacomparativestudybetweentheopenandlaparoscopicapproaches
_version_ 1755938430229938176