Maritus v Mulier: The double picture in adultery laws from Romulus to Augustus

This article investigates the double set of standards applicable to Roman spouses' adultery. It argues that adultery occurred from Romulus to Augustus and was always considered to be the extramarital relationship by or with married women. It examines the position of both the unfaithful husband and the unfaithful wife with regard to conduct which resulted in adultery, its consequences and the measures or remedies available to the injured spouse. Furthermore, the article argues that the social role of the Roman materfamilias and matrona, the Roman male-dominant society and the hidden agendas of Roman authors could be seen as possible reasons for the different moral principles. The article concludes by pointing out that the unfaithful husband was in a much more favourable position than the unfaithful wife and that the social role of the Roman materfamilias and matrona in a male-dominant society appears to have justified these double standards.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jacobs,Annalize
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Southern African Society of Legal Historians and Unisa Press 2015
Online Access:http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1021-545X2015000200004
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1021-545X2015000200004
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1021-545X20150002000042016-02-23Maritus v Mulier: The double picture in adultery laws from Romulus to AugustusJacobs,AnnalizeThis article investigates the double set of standards applicable to Roman spouses' adultery. It argues that adultery occurred from Romulus to Augustus and was always considered to be the extramarital relationship by or with married women. It examines the position of both the unfaithful husband and the unfaithful wife with regard to conduct which resulted in adultery, its consequences and the measures or remedies available to the injured spouse. Furthermore, the article argues that the social role of the Roman materfamilias and matrona, the Roman male-dominant society and the hidden agendas of Roman authors could be seen as possible reasons for the different moral principles. The article concludes by pointing out that the unfaithful husband was in a much more favourable position than the unfaithful wife and that the social role of the Roman materfamilias and matrona in a male-dominant society appears to have justified these double standards.Southern African Society of Legal Historians and Unisa PressFundamina v.21 n.2 20152015-01-01journal articletext/htmlhttp://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1021-545X2015000200004en
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Sudáfrica
countrycode ZA
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-za
tag revista
region África del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Jacobs,Annalize
spellingShingle Jacobs,Annalize
Maritus v Mulier: The double picture in adultery laws from Romulus to Augustus
author_facet Jacobs,Annalize
author_sort Jacobs,Annalize
title Maritus v Mulier: The double picture in adultery laws from Romulus to Augustus
title_short Maritus v Mulier: The double picture in adultery laws from Romulus to Augustus
title_full Maritus v Mulier: The double picture in adultery laws from Romulus to Augustus
title_fullStr Maritus v Mulier: The double picture in adultery laws from Romulus to Augustus
title_full_unstemmed Maritus v Mulier: The double picture in adultery laws from Romulus to Augustus
title_sort maritus v mulier: the double picture in adultery laws from romulus to augustus
description This article investigates the double set of standards applicable to Roman spouses' adultery. It argues that adultery occurred from Romulus to Augustus and was always considered to be the extramarital relationship by or with married women. It examines the position of both the unfaithful husband and the unfaithful wife with regard to conduct which resulted in adultery, its consequences and the measures or remedies available to the injured spouse. Furthermore, the article argues that the social role of the Roman materfamilias and matrona, the Roman male-dominant society and the hidden agendas of Roman authors could be seen as possible reasons for the different moral principles. The article concludes by pointing out that the unfaithful husband was in a much more favourable position than the unfaithful wife and that the social role of the Roman materfamilias and matrona in a male-dominant society appears to have justified these double standards.
publisher Southern African Society of Legal Historians and Unisa Press
publishDate 2015
url http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1021-545X2015000200004
work_keys_str_mv AT jacobsannalize maritusvmulierthedoublepictureinadulterylawsfromromulustoaugustus
_version_ 1756007213217873920