Maritus v Mulier: The double picture in adultery laws from Romulus to Augustus
This article investigates the double set of standards applicable to Roman spouses' adultery. It argues that adultery occurred from Romulus to Augustus and was always considered to be the extramarital relationship by or with married women. It examines the position of both the unfaithful husband and the unfaithful wife with regard to conduct which resulted in adultery, its consequences and the measures or remedies available to the injured spouse. Furthermore, the article argues that the social role of the Roman materfamilias and matrona, the Roman male-dominant society and the hidden agendas of Roman authors could be seen as possible reasons for the different moral principles. The article concludes by pointing out that the unfaithful husband was in a much more favourable position than the unfaithful wife and that the social role of the Roman materfamilias and matrona in a male-dominant society appears to have justified these double standards.
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Digital revista |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Southern African Society of Legal Historians and Unisa Press
2015
|
Online Access: | http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1021-545X2015000200004 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
oai:scielo:S1021-545X2015000200004 |
---|---|
record_format |
ojs |
spelling |
oai:scielo:S1021-545X20150002000042016-02-23Maritus v Mulier: The double picture in adultery laws from Romulus to AugustusJacobs,AnnalizeThis article investigates the double set of standards applicable to Roman spouses' adultery. It argues that adultery occurred from Romulus to Augustus and was always considered to be the extramarital relationship by or with married women. It examines the position of both the unfaithful husband and the unfaithful wife with regard to conduct which resulted in adultery, its consequences and the measures or remedies available to the injured spouse. Furthermore, the article argues that the social role of the Roman materfamilias and matrona, the Roman male-dominant society and the hidden agendas of Roman authors could be seen as possible reasons for the different moral principles. The article concludes by pointing out that the unfaithful husband was in a much more favourable position than the unfaithful wife and that the social role of the Roman materfamilias and matrona in a male-dominant society appears to have justified these double standards.Southern African Society of Legal Historians and Unisa PressFundamina v.21 n.2 20152015-01-01journal articletext/htmlhttp://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1021-545X2015000200004en |
institution |
SCIELO |
collection |
OJS |
country |
Sudáfrica |
countrycode |
ZA |
component |
Revista |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
rev-scielo-za |
tag |
revista |
region |
África del Sur |
libraryname |
SciELO |
language |
English |
format |
Digital |
author |
Jacobs,Annalize |
spellingShingle |
Jacobs,Annalize Maritus v Mulier: The double picture in adultery laws from Romulus to Augustus |
author_facet |
Jacobs,Annalize |
author_sort |
Jacobs,Annalize |
title |
Maritus v Mulier: The double picture in adultery laws from Romulus to Augustus |
title_short |
Maritus v Mulier: The double picture in adultery laws from Romulus to Augustus |
title_full |
Maritus v Mulier: The double picture in adultery laws from Romulus to Augustus |
title_fullStr |
Maritus v Mulier: The double picture in adultery laws from Romulus to Augustus |
title_full_unstemmed |
Maritus v Mulier: The double picture in adultery laws from Romulus to Augustus |
title_sort |
maritus v mulier: the double picture in adultery laws from romulus to augustus |
description |
This article investigates the double set of standards applicable to Roman spouses' adultery. It argues that adultery occurred from Romulus to Augustus and was always considered to be the extramarital relationship by or with married women. It examines the position of both the unfaithful husband and the unfaithful wife with regard to conduct which resulted in adultery, its consequences and the measures or remedies available to the injured spouse. Furthermore, the article argues that the social role of the Roman materfamilias and matrona, the Roman male-dominant society and the hidden agendas of Roman authors could be seen as possible reasons for the different moral principles. The article concludes by pointing out that the unfaithful husband was in a much more favourable position than the unfaithful wife and that the social role of the Roman materfamilias and matrona in a male-dominant society appears to have justified these double standards. |
publisher |
Southern African Society of Legal Historians and Unisa Press |
publishDate |
2015 |
url |
http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1021-545X2015000200004 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jacobsannalize maritusvmulierthedoublepictureinadulterylawsfromromulustoaugustus |
_version_ |
1756007213217873920 |