The Reception of Belhar in the Dutch Reformed Church
This article asks anew the question of the reception of the Belhar Confession in the Dutch Reformed Church (DRC). In the first part, the question of reception is asked. It is argued that reception inter alia has to do with the receiving and acceptance of one another. In the second part, the question of receiving is asked in light of Richard Kearney's carnal hermeneutics. The third part focuses on Esselenpark. It is argued that although the reception of Belhar was not the main focus of Esselenpark, at least for a moment, the DRC was in a way able to begin to apprehend what it might mean to really receive and accept one another. The argument is not that the reception of the Belhar Confession is not of utmost importance for the DRC. The argument is also not that Esselenpark is the one and only moment that the DRC and URCSA did receive and accept one another. The article merely tries to make sense of how sense itself might allow the DRC, of which I am part, to really receive and accept Belhar.
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Digital revista |
Language: | English |
Published: |
The Church History Society of Southern Africa
2019
|
Online Access: | http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1017-04992019000300009 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
oai:scielo:S1017-04992019000300009 |
---|---|
record_format |
ojs |
spelling |
oai:scielo:S1017-049920190003000092020-01-20The Reception of Belhar in the Dutch Reformed Churchvan der Westhuizen,Henco reception Belhar Confession Dutch Reformed Church (DRC) Uniting Reformed Church of Southern Africa (URCSA) This article asks anew the question of the reception of the Belhar Confession in the Dutch Reformed Church (DRC). In the first part, the question of reception is asked. It is argued that reception inter alia has to do with the receiving and acceptance of one another. In the second part, the question of receiving is asked in light of Richard Kearney's carnal hermeneutics. The third part focuses on Esselenpark. It is argued that although the reception of Belhar was not the main focus of Esselenpark, at least for a moment, the DRC was in a way able to begin to apprehend what it might mean to really receive and accept one another. The argument is not that the reception of the Belhar Confession is not of utmost importance for the DRC. The argument is also not that Esselenpark is the one and only moment that the DRC and URCSA did receive and accept one another. The article merely tries to make sense of how sense itself might allow the DRC, of which I am part, to really receive and accept Belhar.The Church History Society of Southern Africa Studia Historiae Ecclesiasticae v.45 n.3 20192019-01-01journal articletext/htmlhttp://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1017-04992019000300009en |
institution |
SCIELO |
collection |
OJS |
country |
Sudáfrica |
countrycode |
ZA |
component |
Revista |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
rev-scielo-za |
tag |
revista |
region |
África del Sur |
libraryname |
SciELO |
language |
English |
format |
Digital |
author |
van der Westhuizen,Henco |
spellingShingle |
van der Westhuizen,Henco The Reception of Belhar in the Dutch Reformed Church |
author_facet |
van der Westhuizen,Henco |
author_sort |
van der Westhuizen,Henco |
title |
The Reception of Belhar in the Dutch Reformed Church |
title_short |
The Reception of Belhar in the Dutch Reformed Church |
title_full |
The Reception of Belhar in the Dutch Reformed Church |
title_fullStr |
The Reception of Belhar in the Dutch Reformed Church |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Reception of Belhar in the Dutch Reformed Church |
title_sort |
reception of belhar in the dutch reformed church |
description |
This article asks anew the question of the reception of the Belhar Confession in the Dutch Reformed Church (DRC). In the first part, the question of reception is asked. It is argued that reception inter alia has to do with the receiving and acceptance of one another. In the second part, the question of receiving is asked in light of Richard Kearney's carnal hermeneutics. The third part focuses on Esselenpark. It is argued that although the reception of Belhar was not the main focus of Esselenpark, at least for a moment, the DRC was in a way able to begin to apprehend what it might mean to really receive and accept one another. The argument is not that the reception of the Belhar Confession is not of utmost importance for the DRC. The argument is also not that Esselenpark is the one and only moment that the DRC and URCSA did receive and accept one another. The article merely tries to make sense of how sense itself might allow the DRC, of which I am part, to really receive and accept Belhar. |
publisher |
The Church History Society of Southern Africa |
publishDate |
2019 |
url |
http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1017-04992019000300009 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT vanderwesthuizenhenco thereceptionofbelharinthedutchreformedchurch AT vanderwesthuizenhenco receptionofbelharinthedutchreformedchurch |
_version_ |
1756006992031252480 |