Respect for animal life in the book of Leviticus. How green were the priestly authors?

The article engages with Leviticus 11 and with some of the ways in which it has been used in the ecotheological debate. Leviticus 11 is part of the Priestly text and Priestly theology has mostly been criticised for its legalism and ritualism as well as for its stifling of spontaneity. Recently our understanding of the priestly worldview has vastly improved and scholars tend to show more appreciation of the priestly cosmology, where Israel finds its place amongst other nations, but where there is also a place for animals in relation to humanity. The well-known Torah scholar Jacob Milgrom has insisted for more than forty years that there is an ethical system of "reverence for life" behind these laws. And the anthropologist Mary Douglas has argued that a respect for animal life is part and parcel of the priestly world-view and is clearly expressed in the priestly sacrificial system. This article attempts to critically engage with these two contributions to biblical scholarship.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Meyer,Esias E.
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: The Old Testament Society of Southern Africa (OTSSA) 2011
Online Access:http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1010-99192011000100008
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1010-99192011000100008
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1010-991920110001000082014-12-10Respect for animal life in the book of Leviticus. How green were the priestly authors?Meyer,Esias E.The article engages with Leviticus 11 and with some of the ways in which it has been used in the ecotheological debate. Leviticus 11 is part of the Priestly text and Priestly theology has mostly been criticised for its legalism and ritualism as well as for its stifling of spontaneity. Recently our understanding of the priestly worldview has vastly improved and scholars tend to show more appreciation of the priestly cosmology, where Israel finds its place amongst other nations, but where there is also a place for animals in relation to humanity. The well-known Torah scholar Jacob Milgrom has insisted for more than forty years that there is an ethical system of "reverence for life" behind these laws. And the anthropologist Mary Douglas has argued that a respect for animal life is part and parcel of the priestly world-view and is clearly expressed in the priestly sacrificial system. This article attempts to critically engage with these two contributions to biblical scholarship.The Old Testament Society of Southern Africa (OTSSA)Old Testament Essays v.24 n.1 20112011-01-01journal articletext/htmlhttp://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1010-99192011000100008en
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Sudáfrica
countrycode ZA
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-za
tag revista
region África del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Meyer,Esias E.
spellingShingle Meyer,Esias E.
Respect for animal life in the book of Leviticus. How green were the priestly authors?
author_facet Meyer,Esias E.
author_sort Meyer,Esias E.
title Respect for animal life in the book of Leviticus. How green were the priestly authors?
title_short Respect for animal life in the book of Leviticus. How green were the priestly authors?
title_full Respect for animal life in the book of Leviticus. How green were the priestly authors?
title_fullStr Respect for animal life in the book of Leviticus. How green were the priestly authors?
title_full_unstemmed Respect for animal life in the book of Leviticus. How green were the priestly authors?
title_sort respect for animal life in the book of leviticus. how green were the priestly authors?
description The article engages with Leviticus 11 and with some of the ways in which it has been used in the ecotheological debate. Leviticus 11 is part of the Priestly text and Priestly theology has mostly been criticised for its legalism and ritualism as well as for its stifling of spontaneity. Recently our understanding of the priestly worldview has vastly improved and scholars tend to show more appreciation of the priestly cosmology, where Israel finds its place amongst other nations, but where there is also a place for animals in relation to humanity. The well-known Torah scholar Jacob Milgrom has insisted for more than forty years that there is an ethical system of "reverence for life" behind these laws. And the anthropologist Mary Douglas has argued that a respect for animal life is part and parcel of the priestly world-view and is clearly expressed in the priestly sacrificial system. This article attempts to critically engage with these two contributions to biblical scholarship.
publisher The Old Testament Society of Southern Africa (OTSSA)
publishDate 2011
url http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1010-99192011000100008
work_keys_str_mv AT meyeresiase respectforanimallifeinthebookofleviticushowgreenwerethepriestlyauthors
_version_ 1756006690197602304