ARE CONDITIONAL AND DISJUNCTION REALLY COMPARABLE?
Liu and Chou theorize that the rules of Modus Ponens and Modus Tollens have equivalent disjunctive forms. They present an experiment using these forms and conclude that, if applied to disjunctive inferences, the rule of Modus Tollens is not more difficult than the rule of Modus Ponens. Their explanation is based on a successive-conditionalization framework, but, in this paper, it is argued that their results can be interpreted according to, at least, another two theories, the mental models theory and the formal rules theory, and that, therefore, their experiment does not necessarily prove their theses.
Saved in:
Main Author: | López Astorga,Miguel |
---|---|
Format: | Digital revista |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidad de Talca. Instituto de Estudios Humanísticos
2013
|
Online Access: | http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-23762013000200012 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
THE CASE OF THE CONDITIONALS WITH DISJUNCTIONS EMBEDDED INTO THEIR ANTECEDENTS: MENTAL LOGIC VERSUS SEMANTIC MODELS
by: López Astorga,Miguel
Published: (2015) -
Mental Logic and the Denials of Conjunctions and Disjunctions
by: López-Astorga,Miguel
Published: (2016) -
Exclusivity and kinds of models in modulated disjunctive inferences
by: López-Astorga,Miguel
Published: (2019) -
The challenge of consciousness with special reference to the exclusive disjunction
by: Antonites,Alex
Published: (2015) -
CONDITIONALS AND DISJUNCTIONS IN MENTAL-LOGIC THEORY: A RESPONSE TO LIU AND CHOU (2012) AND TO LÓPEZ ASTORGA (2013)
by: O'Brien,David P
Published: (2014)