Tooth size and metabolic requirements in Primates: The 'equivalence between exponents' under discussion

The functional significance of teeth size, specifically postcanine tooth size has contributed a vast amount of scientific literature. Nevertheless, these studies have been based on 'equivalence between exponents'. That is, when the tooth size scales to the 0.75 power of body size exponent is interpreted as reflecting differences in metabolic requirements. On the contrary, if the obtained exponent is close to isometry, such slope is interpreted as that variation in teeth size is an incidental consequence of body size variation. In this paper, we show the results of a study in which the relationship between postcanine tooth occlusal area (PCOA) and basal metabolic rate (BMR) has been evaluated in 28 primate species. On one hand, the results obtained indicate that there is a high correlation between the BMR and the size of the PCOA, even when phylogenetic control tests are used, and that isometry cannot be discarded in both cases. However, if the effects of body mass are removed, a null slope cannot be discarded. On the other hand, when body mass (BM) is taken as the independent variable and PCOA as the dependent one, the slope obtained evidences a negative allometry, and this holds also when phylogenetic control is used. Given these contradictory results, we suggest that the rule of 'equivalence between exponents' is not a good approach for obtaining inferences on the function of postcanine teeth. The argument for the existence or absence of a given relationship between two variables is based on the p value used for testing the null hypothesis H0 (ß1=0), which is independent of the value taken by the slope of one of these variables when regressed on a third one. In any case, BM emerges as a key factor in the relationship between PCOA and BRM.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jiménez-Arenas,Juan Manuel
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedad Chilena de Anatomía 2013
Online Access:http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0717-95022013000400008
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0717-95022013000400008
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0717-950220130004000082014-02-18Tooth size and metabolic requirements in Primates: The 'equivalence between exponents' under discussionJiménez-Arenas,Juan Manuel Postcanine tooth size Basal metabolic rate Allometry Body size The functional significance of teeth size, specifically postcanine tooth size has contributed a vast amount of scientific literature. Nevertheless, these studies have been based on 'equivalence between exponents'. That is, when the tooth size scales to the 0.75 power of body size exponent is interpreted as reflecting differences in metabolic requirements. On the contrary, if the obtained exponent is close to isometry, such slope is interpreted as that variation in teeth size is an incidental consequence of body size variation. In this paper, we show the results of a study in which the relationship between postcanine tooth occlusal area (PCOA) and basal metabolic rate (BMR) has been evaluated in 28 primate species. On one hand, the results obtained indicate that there is a high correlation between the BMR and the size of the PCOA, even when phylogenetic control tests are used, and that isometry cannot be discarded in both cases. However, if the effects of body mass are removed, a null slope cannot be discarded. On the other hand, when body mass (BM) is taken as the independent variable and PCOA as the dependent one, the slope obtained evidences a negative allometry, and this holds also when phylogenetic control is used. Given these contradictory results, we suggest that the rule of 'equivalence between exponents' is not a good approach for obtaining inferences on the function of postcanine teeth. The argument for the existence or absence of a given relationship between two variables is based on the p value used for testing the null hypothesis H0 (ß1=0), which is independent of the value taken by the slope of one of these variables when regressed on a third one. In any case, BM emerges as a key factor in the relationship between PCOA and BRM.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedad Chilena de AnatomíaInternational Journal of Morphology v.31 n.4 20132013-12-01text/htmlhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0717-95022013000400008en10.4067/S0717-95022013000400008
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Chile
countrycode CL
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-cl
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Jiménez-Arenas,Juan Manuel
spellingShingle Jiménez-Arenas,Juan Manuel
Tooth size and metabolic requirements in Primates: The 'equivalence between exponents' under discussion
author_facet Jiménez-Arenas,Juan Manuel
author_sort Jiménez-Arenas,Juan Manuel
title Tooth size and metabolic requirements in Primates: The 'equivalence between exponents' under discussion
title_short Tooth size and metabolic requirements in Primates: The 'equivalence between exponents' under discussion
title_full Tooth size and metabolic requirements in Primates: The 'equivalence between exponents' under discussion
title_fullStr Tooth size and metabolic requirements in Primates: The 'equivalence between exponents' under discussion
title_full_unstemmed Tooth size and metabolic requirements in Primates: The 'equivalence between exponents' under discussion
title_sort tooth size and metabolic requirements in primates: the 'equivalence between exponents' under discussion
description The functional significance of teeth size, specifically postcanine tooth size has contributed a vast amount of scientific literature. Nevertheless, these studies have been based on 'equivalence between exponents'. That is, when the tooth size scales to the 0.75 power of body size exponent is interpreted as reflecting differences in metabolic requirements. On the contrary, if the obtained exponent is close to isometry, such slope is interpreted as that variation in teeth size is an incidental consequence of body size variation. In this paper, we show the results of a study in which the relationship between postcanine tooth occlusal area (PCOA) and basal metabolic rate (BMR) has been evaluated in 28 primate species. On one hand, the results obtained indicate that there is a high correlation between the BMR and the size of the PCOA, even when phylogenetic control tests are used, and that isometry cannot be discarded in both cases. However, if the effects of body mass are removed, a null slope cannot be discarded. On the other hand, when body mass (BM) is taken as the independent variable and PCOA as the dependent one, the slope obtained evidences a negative allometry, and this holds also when phylogenetic control is used. Given these contradictory results, we suggest that the rule of 'equivalence between exponents' is not a good approach for obtaining inferences on the function of postcanine teeth. The argument for the existence or absence of a given relationship between two variables is based on the p value used for testing the null hypothesis H0 (ß1=0), which is independent of the value taken by the slope of one of these variables when regressed on a third one. In any case, BM emerges as a key factor in the relationship between PCOA and BRM.
publisher Sociedad Chilena de Anatomía
publishDate 2013
url http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0717-95022013000400008
work_keys_str_mv AT jimenezarenasjuanmanuel toothsizeandmetabolicrequirementsinprimatestheequivalencebetweenexponentsunderdiscussion
_version_ 1755992993790164992