Omalizumab versus cyclosporin-A for the treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria: can we define better-responding endotypes?

Abstract Background: Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria (CSU) is characterized by recurrent wheals and/or angioedema for longer than 6-weeks. Guidelines recommend Omalizumab (Oma) as first-line and Cyclosporine-A (Cs-A) as second-line treatment in antihistamine resistant CSU. This step-wise algorithm might be time-consuming and costly. Objective: To determine indicators of response to Oma or Cs-A in CSU patients. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from seven centers in Turkey; the inclusion criteria for patients were to receive both Oma and Cs-A treatment (not concurrently) at some point in time during their follow-up. Clinical and laboratory features were compared between groups. Results: Among 110 CSU patients; 47 (42.7%) were Oma-responders, 15 (13.6%) were Cs-A-responders, and 24 (21.8%) were both Oma and Cs-A responders and 24 (21.8%) were non-responders to either drug. High CRP levels were more frequent in Cs-A-responders (72.7% vs. 40.3%; p = 0.055). Oma-responders had higher baseline UCT (Urticaria Control Test) scores (6 vs. 4.5; p = 0.045). Responders to both drugs had less angioedema and higher baseline UCT scores compared to other groups (33.3% vs. 62.8%; p = 0.01 and 8 vs. 5; p = 0.017). Non-responders to both drugs had an increased frequency in the female gender and lower baseline UCT scores compared to other groups (87.5% vs. 61.6%; p = 0.017 and 5 vs. 7; p = 0.06). Study Limitations: Retrospective nature, limited number of patients, no control group, the lack of the basophil activation (BAT) or BHRA (basophil histamine release assay) tests. Conclusions: Baseline disease activity assessment, which considers the presence of angioedema and disease activity scores, gender, and CRP levels might be helpful to predict treatment outcomes in CSU patients and to choose the right treatment for each patient. Categorizing patients into particular endotypes could provide treatment optimization and increase treatment success. © 2022 Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. on behalf of Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kocatürk,Emek, Başkan,Emel Bülbül, Küçük,Özlem Su, Özdemir,Mustafa, Örnek,Sinem, Can,Pelin Kuteyla, Hașal,Eda, Engin,Burhan, Atakan,Nilgün, Alpsoy,Erkan
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia 2022
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0365-05962022000500592
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0365-05962022000500592
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0365-059620220005005922022-09-27Omalizumab versus cyclosporin-A for the treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria: can we define better-responding endotypes?Kocatürk,EmekBaşkan,Emel BülbülKüçük,Özlem SuÖzdemir,MustafaÖrnek,SinemCan,Pelin KuteylaHașal,EdaEngin,BurhanAtakan,NilgünAlpsoy,Erkan Biomarker Chronic urticaria Cyclosporine Omalizumab Abstract Background: Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria (CSU) is characterized by recurrent wheals and/or angioedema for longer than 6-weeks. Guidelines recommend Omalizumab (Oma) as first-line and Cyclosporine-A (Cs-A) as second-line treatment in antihistamine resistant CSU. This step-wise algorithm might be time-consuming and costly. Objective: To determine indicators of response to Oma or Cs-A in CSU patients. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from seven centers in Turkey; the inclusion criteria for patients were to receive both Oma and Cs-A treatment (not concurrently) at some point in time during their follow-up. Clinical and laboratory features were compared between groups. Results: Among 110 CSU patients; 47 (42.7%) were Oma-responders, 15 (13.6%) were Cs-A-responders, and 24 (21.8%) were both Oma and Cs-A responders and 24 (21.8%) were non-responders to either drug. High CRP levels were more frequent in Cs-A-responders (72.7% vs. 40.3%; p = 0.055). Oma-responders had higher baseline UCT (Urticaria Control Test) scores (6 vs. 4.5; p = 0.045). Responders to both drugs had less angioedema and higher baseline UCT scores compared to other groups (33.3% vs. 62.8%; p = 0.01 and 8 vs. 5; p = 0.017). Non-responders to both drugs had an increased frequency in the female gender and lower baseline UCT scores compared to other groups (87.5% vs. 61.6%; p = 0.017 and 5 vs. 7; p = 0.06). Study Limitations: Retrospective nature, limited number of patients, no control group, the lack of the basophil activation (BAT) or BHRA (basophil histamine release assay) tests. Conclusions: Baseline disease activity assessment, which considers the presence of angioedema and disease activity scores, gender, and CRP levels might be helpful to predict treatment outcomes in CSU patients and to choose the right treatment for each patient. Categorizing patients into particular endotypes could provide treatment optimization and increase treatment success. © 2022 Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. on behalf of Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedade Brasileira de DermatologiaAnais Brasileiros de Dermatologia v.97 n.5 20222022-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0365-05962022000500592en10.1016/j.abd.2022.03.003
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Kocatürk,Emek
Başkan,Emel Bülbül
Küçük,Özlem Su
Özdemir,Mustafa
Örnek,Sinem
Can,Pelin Kuteyla
Hașal,Eda
Engin,Burhan
Atakan,Nilgün
Alpsoy,Erkan
spellingShingle Kocatürk,Emek
Başkan,Emel Bülbül
Küçük,Özlem Su
Özdemir,Mustafa
Örnek,Sinem
Can,Pelin Kuteyla
Hașal,Eda
Engin,Burhan
Atakan,Nilgün
Alpsoy,Erkan
Omalizumab versus cyclosporin-A for the treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria: can we define better-responding endotypes?
author_facet Kocatürk,Emek
Başkan,Emel Bülbül
Küçük,Özlem Su
Özdemir,Mustafa
Örnek,Sinem
Can,Pelin Kuteyla
Hașal,Eda
Engin,Burhan
Atakan,Nilgün
Alpsoy,Erkan
author_sort Kocatürk,Emek
title Omalizumab versus cyclosporin-A for the treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria: can we define better-responding endotypes?
title_short Omalizumab versus cyclosporin-A for the treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria: can we define better-responding endotypes?
title_full Omalizumab versus cyclosporin-A for the treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria: can we define better-responding endotypes?
title_fullStr Omalizumab versus cyclosporin-A for the treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria: can we define better-responding endotypes?
title_full_unstemmed Omalizumab versus cyclosporin-A for the treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria: can we define better-responding endotypes?
title_sort omalizumab versus cyclosporin-a for the treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria: can we define better-responding endotypes?
description Abstract Background: Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria (CSU) is characterized by recurrent wheals and/or angioedema for longer than 6-weeks. Guidelines recommend Omalizumab (Oma) as first-line and Cyclosporine-A (Cs-A) as second-line treatment in antihistamine resistant CSU. This step-wise algorithm might be time-consuming and costly. Objective: To determine indicators of response to Oma or Cs-A in CSU patients. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from seven centers in Turkey; the inclusion criteria for patients were to receive both Oma and Cs-A treatment (not concurrently) at some point in time during their follow-up. Clinical and laboratory features were compared between groups. Results: Among 110 CSU patients; 47 (42.7%) were Oma-responders, 15 (13.6%) were Cs-A-responders, and 24 (21.8%) were both Oma and Cs-A responders and 24 (21.8%) were non-responders to either drug. High CRP levels were more frequent in Cs-A-responders (72.7% vs. 40.3%; p = 0.055). Oma-responders had higher baseline UCT (Urticaria Control Test) scores (6 vs. 4.5; p = 0.045). Responders to both drugs had less angioedema and higher baseline UCT scores compared to other groups (33.3% vs. 62.8%; p = 0.01 and 8 vs. 5; p = 0.017). Non-responders to both drugs had an increased frequency in the female gender and lower baseline UCT scores compared to other groups (87.5% vs. 61.6%; p = 0.017 and 5 vs. 7; p = 0.06). Study Limitations: Retrospective nature, limited number of patients, no control group, the lack of the basophil activation (BAT) or BHRA (basophil histamine release assay) tests. Conclusions: Baseline disease activity assessment, which considers the presence of angioedema and disease activity scores, gender, and CRP levels might be helpful to predict treatment outcomes in CSU patients and to choose the right treatment for each patient. Categorizing patients into particular endotypes could provide treatment optimization and increase treatment success. © 2022 Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. on behalf of Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia
publishDate 2022
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0365-05962022000500592
work_keys_str_mv AT kocaturkemek omalizumabversuscyclosporinaforthetreatmentofchronicspontaneousurticariacanwedefinebetterrespondingendotypes
AT baskanemelbulbul omalizumabversuscyclosporinaforthetreatmentofchronicspontaneousurticariacanwedefinebetterrespondingendotypes
AT kucukozlemsu omalizumabversuscyclosporinaforthetreatmentofchronicspontaneousurticariacanwedefinebetterrespondingendotypes
AT ozdemirmustafa omalizumabversuscyclosporinaforthetreatmentofchronicspontaneousurticariacanwedefinebetterrespondingendotypes
AT orneksinem omalizumabversuscyclosporinaforthetreatmentofchronicspontaneousurticariacanwedefinebetterrespondingendotypes
AT canpelinkuteyla omalizumabversuscyclosporinaforthetreatmentofchronicspontaneousurticariacanwedefinebetterrespondingendotypes
AT hasaleda omalizumabversuscyclosporinaforthetreatmentofchronicspontaneousurticariacanwedefinebetterrespondingendotypes
AT enginburhan omalizumabversuscyclosporinaforthetreatmentofchronicspontaneousurticariacanwedefinebetterrespondingendotypes
AT atakannilgun omalizumabversuscyclosporinaforthetreatmentofchronicspontaneousurticariacanwedefinebetterrespondingendotypes
AT alpsoyerkan omalizumabversuscyclosporinaforthetreatmentofchronicspontaneousurticariacanwedefinebetterrespondingendotypes
_version_ 1756412715124916224