Auricular reconstruction after Mohs micrographic surgery: analysis of 101 cases
Abstract Background: The ear is a region that has a high prevalence of cutaneous carcinomas and several guidelines indicate Mohs micrographic surgery as the first-choice treatment in such cases. Although the technique allows maximum preservation of healthy tissue, many auricular surgical wounds constitute a challenge due to the peculiar local anatomy, with evident curves and reliefs. Auricular reconstruction should prioritize function before aesthetics, but without leaving the latter aside, since postoperative distortions can have a significant psychological impact. Objective: To describe the authors’ experience in auricular reconstruction after Mohs surgery and to evaluate the most frequently used repair methods. Methods: Retrospective study of consecutive cases submitted to Mohs surgery and auricular reconstruction, over a period of 3 years. Results: One hundred and one cases were included and the most common repair method was primary closure (n = 35), followed by full-thickness skin graft (n = 30) and flaps (n = 24). In thirty cases, reconstruction methods were associated. Seven patients had complications (partial graft necrosis, postoperative bleeding or infection). Study limitations: Retrospective design and the absence of long-term follow-up of some cases. Conclusions: The dermatologic surgeon should be familiarized with different options for auricular reconstruction. Primary closure and skin grafts were the most frequently used repair methods.
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Digital revista |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia
2021
|
Online Access: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0365-05962021000400408 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
oai:scielo:S0365-05962021000400408 |
---|---|
record_format |
ojs |
spelling |
oai:scielo:S0365-059620210004004082021-07-30Auricular reconstruction after Mohs micrographic surgery: analysis of 101 casesBittner,Guilherme CanhoKubo,Elisa MayumiFantini,Bruno de CarvalhoCerci,Felipe Bochnia Auricular pavilion Ear neoplasms Mohs surgery Surgical flaps Abstract Background: The ear is a region that has a high prevalence of cutaneous carcinomas and several guidelines indicate Mohs micrographic surgery as the first-choice treatment in such cases. Although the technique allows maximum preservation of healthy tissue, many auricular surgical wounds constitute a challenge due to the peculiar local anatomy, with evident curves and reliefs. Auricular reconstruction should prioritize function before aesthetics, but without leaving the latter aside, since postoperative distortions can have a significant psychological impact. Objective: To describe the authors’ experience in auricular reconstruction after Mohs surgery and to evaluate the most frequently used repair methods. Methods: Retrospective study of consecutive cases submitted to Mohs surgery and auricular reconstruction, over a period of 3 years. Results: One hundred and one cases were included and the most common repair method was primary closure (n = 35), followed by full-thickness skin graft (n = 30) and flaps (n = 24). In thirty cases, reconstruction methods were associated. Seven patients had complications (partial graft necrosis, postoperative bleeding or infection). Study limitations: Retrospective design and the absence of long-term follow-up of some cases. Conclusions: The dermatologic surgeon should be familiarized with different options for auricular reconstruction. Primary closure and skin grafts were the most frequently used repair methods.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedade Brasileira de DermatologiaAnais Brasileiros de Dermatologia v.96 n.4 20212021-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0365-05962021000400408en10.1016/j.abd.2020.12.008 |
institution |
SCIELO |
collection |
OJS |
country |
Brasil |
countrycode |
BR |
component |
Revista |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
rev-scielo-br |
tag |
revista |
region |
America del Sur |
libraryname |
SciELO |
language |
English |
format |
Digital |
author |
Bittner,Guilherme Canho Kubo,Elisa Mayumi Fantini,Bruno de Carvalho Cerci,Felipe Bochnia |
spellingShingle |
Bittner,Guilherme Canho Kubo,Elisa Mayumi Fantini,Bruno de Carvalho Cerci,Felipe Bochnia Auricular reconstruction after Mohs micrographic surgery: analysis of 101 cases |
author_facet |
Bittner,Guilherme Canho Kubo,Elisa Mayumi Fantini,Bruno de Carvalho Cerci,Felipe Bochnia |
author_sort |
Bittner,Guilherme Canho |
title |
Auricular reconstruction after Mohs micrographic surgery: analysis of 101 cases |
title_short |
Auricular reconstruction after Mohs micrographic surgery: analysis of 101 cases |
title_full |
Auricular reconstruction after Mohs micrographic surgery: analysis of 101 cases |
title_fullStr |
Auricular reconstruction after Mohs micrographic surgery: analysis of 101 cases |
title_full_unstemmed |
Auricular reconstruction after Mohs micrographic surgery: analysis of 101 cases |
title_sort |
auricular reconstruction after mohs micrographic surgery: analysis of 101 cases |
description |
Abstract Background: The ear is a region that has a high prevalence of cutaneous carcinomas and several guidelines indicate Mohs micrographic surgery as the first-choice treatment in such cases. Although the technique allows maximum preservation of healthy tissue, many auricular surgical wounds constitute a challenge due to the peculiar local anatomy, with evident curves and reliefs. Auricular reconstruction should prioritize function before aesthetics, but without leaving the latter aside, since postoperative distortions can have a significant psychological impact. Objective: To describe the authors’ experience in auricular reconstruction after Mohs surgery and to evaluate the most frequently used repair methods. Methods: Retrospective study of consecutive cases submitted to Mohs surgery and auricular reconstruction, over a period of 3 years. Results: One hundred and one cases were included and the most common repair method was primary closure (n = 35), followed by full-thickness skin graft (n = 30) and flaps (n = 24). In thirty cases, reconstruction methods were associated. Seven patients had complications (partial graft necrosis, postoperative bleeding or infection). Study limitations: Retrospective design and the absence of long-term follow-up of some cases. Conclusions: The dermatologic surgeon should be familiarized with different options for auricular reconstruction. Primary closure and skin grafts were the most frequently used repair methods. |
publisher |
Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0365-05962021000400408 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT bittnerguilhermecanho auricularreconstructionaftermohsmicrographicsurgeryanalysisof101cases AT kuboelisamayumi auricularreconstructionaftermohsmicrographicsurgeryanalysisof101cases AT fantinibrunodecarvalho auricularreconstructionaftermohsmicrographicsurgeryanalysisof101cases AT cercifelipebochnia auricularreconstructionaftermohsmicrographicsurgeryanalysisof101cases |
_version_ |
1756412686480965632 |