A dialogue with Sen's Theory of capabilities and its implications for our National Democratic Revolution

In 'traditional' liberation theological discourse, especially the Latin American strand, the concept of development, desarrollismo, that is developmentalism, has been severely critiqued. In recent times, the interpretation of development shifted to a number of models, one of which has been the view of development as freedom, associated with Amartya Sen's 'capabilities theory'. While the capabilities theory ostensibly comes closer to the goals of the liberation paradigm in general, this article seeks to critically explore in dialogue with this theory of capabilities assumptions and implications of the concept of development for our national democratic revolution. A number of service delivery strikes in our land, with many poor people expecting government to 'deliver' for them, might suggest among other things that the state does 'development' for people, hence the designation of the post-1994 South African state as a 'developmental state'. This article argues that, at foundational level, development understood as liberation could help alter the assumptions that held the national democratic revolution back.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Vellem,Vuyani
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: University of Pretoria 2016
Online Access:http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0259-94222016000400108
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0259-94222016000400108
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0259-942220160004001082017-09-21A dialogue with Sen's Theory of capabilities and its implications for our National Democratic RevolutionVellem,VuyaniIn 'traditional' liberation theological discourse, especially the Latin American strand, the concept of development, desarrollismo, that is developmentalism, has been severely critiqued. In recent times, the interpretation of development shifted to a number of models, one of which has been the view of development as freedom, associated with Amartya Sen's 'capabilities theory'. While the capabilities theory ostensibly comes closer to the goals of the liberation paradigm in general, this article seeks to critically explore in dialogue with this theory of capabilities assumptions and implications of the concept of development for our national democratic revolution. A number of service delivery strikes in our land, with many poor people expecting government to 'deliver' for them, might suggest among other things that the state does 'development' for people, hence the designation of the post-1994 South African state as a 'developmental state'. This article argues that, at foundational level, development understood as liberation could help alter the assumptions that held the national democratic revolution back. University of Pretoria HTS Theological Studies v.72 n.4 20162016-01-01journal articletext/htmlhttp://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0259-94222016000400108en
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Sudáfrica
countrycode ZA
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-za
tag revista
region África del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Vellem,Vuyani
spellingShingle Vellem,Vuyani
A dialogue with Sen's Theory of capabilities and its implications for our National Democratic Revolution
author_facet Vellem,Vuyani
author_sort Vellem,Vuyani
title A dialogue with Sen's Theory of capabilities and its implications for our National Democratic Revolution
title_short A dialogue with Sen's Theory of capabilities and its implications for our National Democratic Revolution
title_full A dialogue with Sen's Theory of capabilities and its implications for our National Democratic Revolution
title_fullStr A dialogue with Sen's Theory of capabilities and its implications for our National Democratic Revolution
title_full_unstemmed A dialogue with Sen's Theory of capabilities and its implications for our National Democratic Revolution
title_sort dialogue with sen's theory of capabilities and its implications for our national democratic revolution
description In 'traditional' liberation theological discourse, especially the Latin American strand, the concept of development, desarrollismo, that is developmentalism, has been severely critiqued. In recent times, the interpretation of development shifted to a number of models, one of which has been the view of development as freedom, associated with Amartya Sen's 'capabilities theory'. While the capabilities theory ostensibly comes closer to the goals of the liberation paradigm in general, this article seeks to critically explore in dialogue with this theory of capabilities assumptions and implications of the concept of development for our national democratic revolution. A number of service delivery strikes in our land, with many poor people expecting government to 'deliver' for them, might suggest among other things that the state does 'development' for people, hence the designation of the post-1994 South African state as a 'developmental state'. This article argues that, at foundational level, development understood as liberation could help alter the assumptions that held the national democratic revolution back.
publisher University of Pretoria
publishDate 2016
url http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0259-94222016000400108
work_keys_str_mv AT vellemvuyani adialoguewithsenstheoryofcapabilitiesanditsimplicationsforournationaldemocraticrevolution
AT vellemvuyani dialoguewithsenstheoryofcapabilitiesanditsimplicationsforournationaldemocraticrevolution
_version_ 1756006221840646144