The challenge of consciousness with special reference to the exclusive disjunction
The theory of evolution makes sense of the emergence of consciousness. Reduction is not wrong as such, but must not be totalised. The fact that we are star stuff does not preclude the novelty of consciousness. Materialism is naturalism, but naturalism need not be materialism. Neural pathways are relevant but are not the total picture. The central thesis is about David Chalmers's philosophy being based on an exclusive disjunction. An inclusive disjunction is, when explained, more appropriate. Functionalism is appropriate. Thomas Nagel's philosophy on first person ontology can still be maintained. Quantum and complexity theories' hypothesis on consciousness is more compatible with freedom of decision than classical theories.
Saved in:
Main Author: | Antonites,Alex |
---|---|
Format: | Digital revista |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Pretoria
2015
|
Online Access: | http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0259-94222015000100099 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Exclusivity and kinds of models in modulated disjunctive inferences
by: López-Astorga,Miguel
Published: (2019) -
The meaning and challenge of the quest for extraterrestrials
by: Antonites,Alex
Published: (2013) -
ARE CONDITIONAL AND DISJUNCTION REALLY COMPARABLE?
by: López Astorga,Miguel
Published: (2013) -
Mental Logic and the Denials of Conjunctions and Disjunctions
by: López-Astorga,Miguel
Published: (2016) -
Mortality Rates of Surgical Techniques for Correcting Atrioventricular Disjunction
by: Pires Junior,Élcio, et al.
Published: (2020)