Reassessing Jacob Strauss and the Mosaic Code

This article reviewed claims made by modern scholars Ford Lewis Battles, G.H. Williams, and Theodore Tappert concerning the views of Jacob Strauss (1480-1530), court preacher at Eisenach, particularly in regard to the imposition of Mosaic Law upon the civil realm. Most pointedly, Battles claims Strauss proposed to replace European civil law completely with the 'entire Mosaic code'. This study examined Strauss's relevant writings to determine his position on Mosaic Law and civil law and demonstrated that the claims of Battles, Williams, and Tappert were not supported by the primary source evidence. Selections from Strauss' 51 theses on usury are translated into English for the first time. To a much lesser degree, this study addressed the issue in regard to the Weimar court preacher Wolfgang Stein, against whom the same claims were made. A paucity of evidence rendered those claims dubious in his case. In the end we were left only with unsubstantiated second-hand claims against these men.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: McDurmon,Joel
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: University of Pretoria 2012
Online Access:http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0259-94222012000100092
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0259-94222012000100092
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0259-942220120001000922013-03-08Reassessing Jacob Strauss and the Mosaic CodeMcDurmon,JoelThis article reviewed claims made by modern scholars Ford Lewis Battles, G.H. Williams, and Theodore Tappert concerning the views of Jacob Strauss (1480-1530), court preacher at Eisenach, particularly in regard to the imposition of Mosaic Law upon the civil realm. Most pointedly, Battles claims Strauss proposed to replace European civil law completely with the 'entire Mosaic code'. This study examined Strauss's relevant writings to determine his position on Mosaic Law and civil law and demonstrated that the claims of Battles, Williams, and Tappert were not supported by the primary source evidence. Selections from Strauss' 51 theses on usury are translated into English for the first time. To a much lesser degree, this study addressed the issue in regard to the Weimar court preacher Wolfgang Stein, against whom the same claims were made. A paucity of evidence rendered those claims dubious in his case. In the end we were left only with unsubstantiated second-hand claims against these men. University of Pretoria HTS Theological Studies v.68 n.1 20122012-01-01journal articletext/htmlhttp://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0259-94222012000100092en
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Sudáfrica
countrycode ZA
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-za
tag revista
region África del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author McDurmon,Joel
spellingShingle McDurmon,Joel
Reassessing Jacob Strauss and the Mosaic Code
author_facet McDurmon,Joel
author_sort McDurmon,Joel
title Reassessing Jacob Strauss and the Mosaic Code
title_short Reassessing Jacob Strauss and the Mosaic Code
title_full Reassessing Jacob Strauss and the Mosaic Code
title_fullStr Reassessing Jacob Strauss and the Mosaic Code
title_full_unstemmed Reassessing Jacob Strauss and the Mosaic Code
title_sort reassessing jacob strauss and the mosaic code
description This article reviewed claims made by modern scholars Ford Lewis Battles, G.H. Williams, and Theodore Tappert concerning the views of Jacob Strauss (1480-1530), court preacher at Eisenach, particularly in regard to the imposition of Mosaic Law upon the civil realm. Most pointedly, Battles claims Strauss proposed to replace European civil law completely with the 'entire Mosaic code'. This study examined Strauss's relevant writings to determine his position on Mosaic Law and civil law and demonstrated that the claims of Battles, Williams, and Tappert were not supported by the primary source evidence. Selections from Strauss' 51 theses on usury are translated into English for the first time. To a much lesser degree, this study addressed the issue in regard to the Weimar court preacher Wolfgang Stein, against whom the same claims were made. A paucity of evidence rendered those claims dubious in his case. In the end we were left only with unsubstantiated second-hand claims against these men.
publisher University of Pretoria
publishDate 2012
url http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0259-94222012000100092
work_keys_str_mv AT mcdurmonjoel reassessingjacobstraussandthemosaiccode
_version_ 1756006120967634944