Matthew, Paul and the origin and nature of the gentile mission: the great commission in Matthew 28:16-20 as an anti-Pauline tradition

The Great Commission at the conclusion of Matthew's Gospel is one of its key texts. In this tradition the risen Christ overturns the previous restriction of the mission to Israel alone and demands that the disciples evangelise all the nations. The gospel they were to proclaim included observance of the Torah by Jew and Gentile like. Matthew's account of the origin and nature of the Gentile mission differs from Paul's view as it is found in the epistle to the Galatians. Paul maintains that he had been commissioned by the resurrected Lord to evangelise the Gentiles and that the gospel he was to preach did not involve obedience to the Torah. The later and alternative version of Matthew can be understood as an attempt by the evangelist to undermine these claims by Paul. Such an interpretation is consistent with Matthew's anti-Pauline polemic that emerges elsewhere in the Gospel.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sim,David C
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: University of Pretoria 2008
Online Access:http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0259-94222008000100021
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0259-94222008000100021
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0259-942220080001000212009-06-25Matthew, Paul and the origin and nature of the gentile mission: the great commission in Matthew 28:16-20 as an anti-Pauline traditionSim,David CThe Great Commission at the conclusion of Matthew's Gospel is one of its key texts. In this tradition the risen Christ overturns the previous restriction of the mission to Israel alone and demands that the disciples evangelise all the nations. The gospel they were to proclaim included observance of the Torah by Jew and Gentile like. Matthew's account of the origin and nature of the Gentile mission differs from Paul's view as it is found in the epistle to the Galatians. Paul maintains that he had been commissioned by the resurrected Lord to evangelise the Gentiles and that the gospel he was to preach did not involve obedience to the Torah. The later and alternative version of Matthew can be understood as an attempt by the evangelist to undermine these claims by Paul. Such an interpretation is consistent with Matthew's anti-Pauline polemic that emerges elsewhere in the Gospel. University of Pretoria HTS Theological Studies v.64 n.1 20082008-03-01journal articletext/htmlhttp://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0259-94222008000100021en
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Sudáfrica
countrycode ZA
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-za
tag revista
region África del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Sim,David C
spellingShingle Sim,David C
Matthew, Paul and the origin and nature of the gentile mission: the great commission in Matthew 28:16-20 as an anti-Pauline tradition
author_facet Sim,David C
author_sort Sim,David C
title Matthew, Paul and the origin and nature of the gentile mission: the great commission in Matthew 28:16-20 as an anti-Pauline tradition
title_short Matthew, Paul and the origin and nature of the gentile mission: the great commission in Matthew 28:16-20 as an anti-Pauline tradition
title_full Matthew, Paul and the origin and nature of the gentile mission: the great commission in Matthew 28:16-20 as an anti-Pauline tradition
title_fullStr Matthew, Paul and the origin and nature of the gentile mission: the great commission in Matthew 28:16-20 as an anti-Pauline tradition
title_full_unstemmed Matthew, Paul and the origin and nature of the gentile mission: the great commission in Matthew 28:16-20 as an anti-Pauline tradition
title_sort matthew, paul and the origin and nature of the gentile mission: the great commission in matthew 28:16-20 as an anti-pauline tradition
description The Great Commission at the conclusion of Matthew's Gospel is one of its key texts. In this tradition the risen Christ overturns the previous restriction of the mission to Israel alone and demands that the disciples evangelise all the nations. The gospel they were to proclaim included observance of the Torah by Jew and Gentile like. Matthew's account of the origin and nature of the Gentile mission differs from Paul's view as it is found in the epistle to the Galatians. Paul maintains that he had been commissioned by the resurrected Lord to evangelise the Gentiles and that the gospel he was to preach did not involve obedience to the Torah. The later and alternative version of Matthew can be understood as an attempt by the evangelist to undermine these claims by Paul. Such an interpretation is consistent with Matthew's anti-Pauline polemic that emerges elsewhere in the Gospel.
publisher University of Pretoria
publishDate 2008
url http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0259-94222008000100021
work_keys_str_mv AT simdavidc matthewpaulandtheoriginandnatureofthegentilemissionthegreatcommissioninmatthew281620asanantipaulinetradition
_version_ 1756006050660614144