Closed traction reduction of cervical spine facet dislocations: Compelled bylaw

BACKGROUND. Following a 2015 ruling, the South African (SA) Constitutional Court obligates closed reduction of cervical facet dislocations sustained through low-energy injury mechanisms, within 4 hours of injury. Closed traction reduction of cervical facet dislocations requires specific equipment and expertise, which have limited availability in SA.OBJECTIVES. To review the time delays, delaying factors and success rate of closed reductions of cervical facet dislocations in a tertiary-level orthopaedic department and training facility, and to consider the feasibility of such a reduction within 4 hours after injury.METHODS. The clinical records and imaging screens of patients presenting with cervical facet dislocations to an academic training hospital between November 2008 and March 2016 were retrospectively reviewed, with specific attention to demographic information, mechanism of injury, time delays from injury to treatment and factors resulting in delay, as well as the success rate in closed cervical reduction.RESULTS. Ninety-one patients with cervical dislocation presented during the study period, of whom 69 were included for further review. The mean age at presentation was 37.6 (range 18 - 65) years. Successful reduction was achieved in 71% (n=49) of cases, with a median delay time from injury to reduction of 26 (interquartile range (IQR) 19.50 - 31.75) hours. Only 1 patient of 69 patients received successful reduction within 6 hours after injury. Neurological improvement was noticed in 5 of 53 patients with neurological deficit - after successful reduction. Two patients improved with two American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grades (from A to C), and 2 improved with one ASIA grade (from A to Β and D to E).CONCLUSIONS. Successful reduction of a cervical facet dislocation within 4 hours presents a challenge to healthcare infrastructure globally. The relative scarcity of this type of injury (91 cases during 8 years in a tertiary referral hospital) prevents district-level clinicians from readily acquiring a level of experience to confidently perform closed reduction of these injuries, unless very specific training and support are provided towards this end.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Potgieter,Μ, Badenhorst,D Η, Mohideen,Μ, Davis,J Η
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: South African Medical Association 2019
Online Access:http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0256-95742019001100013
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0256-95742019001100013
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0256-957420190011000132019-11-14Closed traction reduction of cervical spine facet dislocations: Compelled bylawPotgieter,ΜBadenhorst,D ΗMohideen,ΜDavis,J ΗBACKGROUND. Following a 2015 ruling, the South African (SA) Constitutional Court obligates closed reduction of cervical facet dislocations sustained through low-energy injury mechanisms, within 4 hours of injury. Closed traction reduction of cervical facet dislocations requires specific equipment and expertise, which have limited availability in SA.OBJECTIVES. To review the time delays, delaying factors and success rate of closed reductions of cervical facet dislocations in a tertiary-level orthopaedic department and training facility, and to consider the feasibility of such a reduction within 4 hours after injury.METHODS. The clinical records and imaging screens of patients presenting with cervical facet dislocations to an academic training hospital between November 2008 and March 2016 were retrospectively reviewed, with specific attention to demographic information, mechanism of injury, time delays from injury to treatment and factors resulting in delay, as well as the success rate in closed cervical reduction.RESULTS. Ninety-one patients with cervical dislocation presented during the study period, of whom 69 were included for further review. The mean age at presentation was 37.6 (range 18 - 65) years. Successful reduction was achieved in 71% (n=49) of cases, with a median delay time from injury to reduction of 26 (interquartile range (IQR) 19.50 - 31.75) hours. Only 1 patient of 69 patients received successful reduction within 6 hours after injury. Neurological improvement was noticed in 5 of 53 patients with neurological deficit - after successful reduction. Two patients improved with two American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grades (from A to C), and 2 improved with one ASIA grade (from A to Β and D to E).CONCLUSIONS. Successful reduction of a cervical facet dislocation within 4 hours presents a challenge to healthcare infrastructure globally. The relative scarcity of this type of injury (91 cases during 8 years in a tertiary referral hospital) prevents district-level clinicians from readily acquiring a level of experience to confidently perform closed reduction of these injuries, unless very specific training and support are provided towards this end.South African Medical AssociationSAMJ: South African Medical Journal v.109 n.11 20192019-11-01journal articletext/htmlhttp://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0256-95742019001100013en
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Sudáfrica
countrycode ZA
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-za
tag revista
region África del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Potgieter,Μ
Badenhorst,D Η
Mohideen,Μ
Davis,J Η
spellingShingle Potgieter,Μ
Badenhorst,D Η
Mohideen,Μ
Davis,J Η
Closed traction reduction of cervical spine facet dislocations: Compelled bylaw
author_facet Potgieter,Μ
Badenhorst,D Η
Mohideen,Μ
Davis,J Η
author_sort Potgieter,Μ
title Closed traction reduction of cervical spine facet dislocations: Compelled bylaw
title_short Closed traction reduction of cervical spine facet dislocations: Compelled bylaw
title_full Closed traction reduction of cervical spine facet dislocations: Compelled bylaw
title_fullStr Closed traction reduction of cervical spine facet dislocations: Compelled bylaw
title_full_unstemmed Closed traction reduction of cervical spine facet dislocations: Compelled bylaw
title_sort closed traction reduction of cervical spine facet dislocations: compelled bylaw
description BACKGROUND. Following a 2015 ruling, the South African (SA) Constitutional Court obligates closed reduction of cervical facet dislocations sustained through low-energy injury mechanisms, within 4 hours of injury. Closed traction reduction of cervical facet dislocations requires specific equipment and expertise, which have limited availability in SA.OBJECTIVES. To review the time delays, delaying factors and success rate of closed reductions of cervical facet dislocations in a tertiary-level orthopaedic department and training facility, and to consider the feasibility of such a reduction within 4 hours after injury.METHODS. The clinical records and imaging screens of patients presenting with cervical facet dislocations to an academic training hospital between November 2008 and March 2016 were retrospectively reviewed, with specific attention to demographic information, mechanism of injury, time delays from injury to treatment and factors resulting in delay, as well as the success rate in closed cervical reduction.RESULTS. Ninety-one patients with cervical dislocation presented during the study period, of whom 69 were included for further review. The mean age at presentation was 37.6 (range 18 - 65) years. Successful reduction was achieved in 71% (n=49) of cases, with a median delay time from injury to reduction of 26 (interquartile range (IQR) 19.50 - 31.75) hours. Only 1 patient of 69 patients received successful reduction within 6 hours after injury. Neurological improvement was noticed in 5 of 53 patients with neurological deficit - after successful reduction. Two patients improved with two American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grades (from A to C), and 2 improved with one ASIA grade (from A to Β and D to E).CONCLUSIONS. Successful reduction of a cervical facet dislocation within 4 hours presents a challenge to healthcare infrastructure globally. The relative scarcity of this type of injury (91 cases during 8 years in a tertiary referral hospital) prevents district-level clinicians from readily acquiring a level of experience to confidently perform closed reduction of these injuries, unless very specific training and support are provided towards this end.
publisher South African Medical Association
publishDate 2019
url http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0256-95742019001100013
work_keys_str_mv AT potgieter924 closedtractionreductionofcervicalspinefacetdislocationscompelledbylaw
AT badenhorstd919 closedtractionreductionofcervicalspinefacetdislocationscompelledbylaw
AT mohideen924 closedtractionreductionofcervicalspinefacetdislocationscompelledbylaw
AT davisj919 closedtractionreductionofcervicalspinefacetdislocationscompelledbylaw
_version_ 1756005927625949184