The utility of hand-held mobile spirometer technology in a resource-constrained setting
BACKGROUND: Mobile phone-linked spirometry technology has been designed specifically for evaluating lung function at primary care level. The Air-Smart Spirometer is the first mobile spirometer accepted in Europe for the screening of patients with chronic respiratory diseases OBJECTIVES: To prospectively assess the accuracy of the device in measuring forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) in a South African population, and to investigate the ability of the device to detect obstructive ventilatory impairment METHODS: A total of 200 participants were randomly assigned to perform spirometry with either the mobile spirometer connected to a smartphone or the desktop spirometer first, followed by the other. The FEV1/FVC ratio as well as the absolute FEV1 and FVC measurements were compared, using each participant as their own control. A Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman analysis were performed to measure the agreement between the two devices. We defined obstructive ventilatory impairment as FEV1/FVC <0.7 measured by desktop spirometry in order to calculate the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of the Air-Smart Spirometer RESULTS: There was a strong correlation between the absolute FEV1 and FVC values and FEV1/FVC ratio measured with the mobile AirSmart Spirometer and more conventional pulmonary function testing, with r=0.951, r=0.955 and r=0.898, respectively. The Air-Smart Spirometer had a sensitivity of 97.6%, specificity of 74.4%, PPV of 73.0% and NPV of 97.8% for obstructive ventilatory impairment CONCLUSIONS: The mobile Air-Smart Spirometer compared well with conventional spirometry, making it an attractive and potentially affordable tool for screening purposes in a primary care setting. Moreover, it had a high sensitivity and NPV for obstructive ventilatory impairment
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Digital revista |
Language: | English |
Published: |
South African Medical Association
2019
|
Online Access: | http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0256-95742019000400011 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
oai:scielo:S0256-95742019000400011 |
---|---|
record_format |
ojs |
spelling |
oai:scielo:S0256-957420190004000112019-04-17The utility of hand-held mobile spirometer technology in a resource-constrained settingdu Plessis,ESwart,FMaree,DHeydenreich,Jvan Heerden,JEsterhuizen,T MIrusen,E MKoegelenberg,C F NBACKGROUND: Mobile phone-linked spirometry technology has been designed specifically for evaluating lung function at primary care level. The Air-Smart Spirometer is the first mobile spirometer accepted in Europe for the screening of patients with chronic respiratory diseases OBJECTIVES: To prospectively assess the accuracy of the device in measuring forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) in a South African population, and to investigate the ability of the device to detect obstructive ventilatory impairment METHODS: A total of 200 participants were randomly assigned to perform spirometry with either the mobile spirometer connected to a smartphone or the desktop spirometer first, followed by the other. The FEV1/FVC ratio as well as the absolute FEV1 and FVC measurements were compared, using each participant as their own control. A Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman analysis were performed to measure the agreement between the two devices. We defined obstructive ventilatory impairment as FEV1/FVC <0.7 measured by desktop spirometry in order to calculate the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of the Air-Smart Spirometer RESULTS: There was a strong correlation between the absolute FEV1 and FVC values and FEV1/FVC ratio measured with the mobile AirSmart Spirometer and more conventional pulmonary function testing, with r=0.951, r=0.955 and r=0.898, respectively. The Air-Smart Spirometer had a sensitivity of 97.6%, specificity of 74.4%, PPV of 73.0% and NPV of 97.8% for obstructive ventilatory impairment CONCLUSIONS: The mobile Air-Smart Spirometer compared well with conventional spirometry, making it an attractive and potentially affordable tool for screening purposes in a primary care setting. Moreover, it had a high sensitivity and NPV for obstructive ventilatory impairmentSouth African Medical AssociationSAMJ: South African Medical Journal v.109 n.4 20192019-04-01journal articletext/htmlhttp://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0256-95742019000400011en |
institution |
SCIELO |
collection |
OJS |
country |
Sudáfrica |
countrycode |
ZA |
component |
Revista |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
rev-scielo-za |
tag |
revista |
region |
África del Sur |
libraryname |
SciELO |
language |
English |
format |
Digital |
author |
du Plessis,E Swart,F Maree,D Heydenreich,J van Heerden,J Esterhuizen,T M Irusen,E M Koegelenberg,C F N |
spellingShingle |
du Plessis,E Swart,F Maree,D Heydenreich,J van Heerden,J Esterhuizen,T M Irusen,E M Koegelenberg,C F N The utility of hand-held mobile spirometer technology in a resource-constrained setting |
author_facet |
du Plessis,E Swart,F Maree,D Heydenreich,J van Heerden,J Esterhuizen,T M Irusen,E M Koegelenberg,C F N |
author_sort |
du Plessis,E |
title |
The utility of hand-held mobile spirometer technology in a resource-constrained setting |
title_short |
The utility of hand-held mobile spirometer technology in a resource-constrained setting |
title_full |
The utility of hand-held mobile spirometer technology in a resource-constrained setting |
title_fullStr |
The utility of hand-held mobile spirometer technology in a resource-constrained setting |
title_full_unstemmed |
The utility of hand-held mobile spirometer technology in a resource-constrained setting |
title_sort |
utility of hand-held mobile spirometer technology in a resource-constrained setting |
description |
BACKGROUND: Mobile phone-linked spirometry technology has been designed specifically for evaluating lung function at primary care level. The Air-Smart Spirometer is the first mobile spirometer accepted in Europe for the screening of patients with chronic respiratory diseases OBJECTIVES: To prospectively assess the accuracy of the device in measuring forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) in a South African population, and to investigate the ability of the device to detect obstructive ventilatory impairment METHODS: A total of 200 participants were randomly assigned to perform spirometry with either the mobile spirometer connected to a smartphone or the desktop spirometer first, followed by the other. The FEV1/FVC ratio as well as the absolute FEV1 and FVC measurements were compared, using each participant as their own control. A Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman analysis were performed to measure the agreement between the two devices. We defined obstructive ventilatory impairment as FEV1/FVC <0.7 measured by desktop spirometry in order to calculate the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of the Air-Smart Spirometer RESULTS: There was a strong correlation between the absolute FEV1 and FVC values and FEV1/FVC ratio measured with the mobile AirSmart Spirometer and more conventional pulmonary function testing, with r=0.951, r=0.955 and r=0.898, respectively. The Air-Smart Spirometer had a sensitivity of 97.6%, specificity of 74.4%, PPV of 73.0% and NPV of 97.8% for obstructive ventilatory impairment CONCLUSIONS: The mobile Air-Smart Spirometer compared well with conventional spirometry, making it an attractive and potentially affordable tool for screening purposes in a primary care setting. Moreover, it had a high sensitivity and NPV for obstructive ventilatory impairment |
publisher |
South African Medical Association |
publishDate |
2019 |
url |
http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0256-95742019000400011 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT duplessise theutilityofhandheldmobilespirometertechnologyinaresourceconstrainedsetting AT swartf theutilityofhandheldmobilespirometertechnologyinaresourceconstrainedsetting AT mareed theutilityofhandheldmobilespirometertechnologyinaresourceconstrainedsetting AT heydenreichj theutilityofhandheldmobilespirometertechnologyinaresourceconstrainedsetting AT vanheerdenj theutilityofhandheldmobilespirometertechnologyinaresourceconstrainedsetting AT esterhuizentm theutilityofhandheldmobilespirometertechnologyinaresourceconstrainedsetting AT irusenem theutilityofhandheldmobilespirometertechnologyinaresourceconstrainedsetting AT koegelenbergcfn theutilityofhandheldmobilespirometertechnologyinaresourceconstrainedsetting AT duplessise utilityofhandheldmobilespirometertechnologyinaresourceconstrainedsetting AT swartf utilityofhandheldmobilespirometertechnologyinaresourceconstrainedsetting AT mareed utilityofhandheldmobilespirometertechnologyinaresourceconstrainedsetting AT heydenreichj utilityofhandheldmobilespirometertechnologyinaresourceconstrainedsetting AT vanheerdenj utilityofhandheldmobilespirometertechnologyinaresourceconstrainedsetting AT esterhuizentm utilityofhandheldmobilespirometertechnologyinaresourceconstrainedsetting AT irusenem utilityofhandheldmobilespirometertechnologyinaresourceconstrainedsetting AT koegelenbergcfn utilityofhandheldmobilespirometertechnologyinaresourceconstrainedsetting |
_version_ |
1756005908865875968 |