Hip and knee arthroplasty waiting list -how accurate and fair?

BACKGROUND. Resource-intensive procedures require the use of patient waiting lists in an attempt to increase fairness of access to surgery and improve surgical efficiency. Total hip and knee arthroplasty has waiting lists in excess of years. OBJECTIVES. To analyse our tertiary state institution's hip and knee arthroplasty waiting list to assess its accuracy. METHODS. At Groote Schuur Hospital, our hospital-maintained database was compared with the surgeons' personally maintained database. Patients were then telephoned to confirm their contactability, and to discover whether they still wanted the procedure, or if they had already had it. Waiting duration and patient demographics were then calculated. RESULTS. Of the 655 patients on the hospital waiting list, only 454 were contactable. Three hundred and nine patients still wanted the surgery, 93 had already undergone surgery and 52 no longer wanted surgery. The last group was the oldest and had had the longest waiting time. Those still waiting had waited 451 days (minimum - maximum (standard deviation), 90 - 1 593 (228.5)), those that had had surgery 371 days (0 - 1 728 (296)) and those no longer interested 523 days (138 - 1 881 (260.9)). A total of 429 patients were present on the surgeons' list but not on the hospital list. They had had longer waiting times than those on the hospital list. CONCLUSION. The arthroplasty waiting list is inaccurate due to the existence of two concurrent lists and poor data management, particularly of current contact details. The unfairness of a wide range of waiting times was identified, with patients only on the surgeons' personal database disadvantaged. These deficiencies have prompted the introduction of a scoring-based prioritisation system incorporating clinical, radiographic and societal parameters, in an effort to improve fair and appropriate access to this high-cost care.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kavalieratos,T, Nortje,M, Dunn,R N
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: South African Medical Association 2017
Online Access:http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0256-95742017000400019
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0256-95742017000400019
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0256-957420170004000192017-04-19Hip and knee arthroplasty waiting list -how accurate and fair?Kavalieratos,TNortje,MDunn,R NBACKGROUND. Resource-intensive procedures require the use of patient waiting lists in an attempt to increase fairness of access to surgery and improve surgical efficiency. Total hip and knee arthroplasty has waiting lists in excess of years. OBJECTIVES. To analyse our tertiary state institution's hip and knee arthroplasty waiting list to assess its accuracy. METHODS. At Groote Schuur Hospital, our hospital-maintained database was compared with the surgeons' personally maintained database. Patients were then telephoned to confirm their contactability, and to discover whether they still wanted the procedure, or if they had already had it. Waiting duration and patient demographics were then calculated. RESULTS. Of the 655 patients on the hospital waiting list, only 454 were contactable. Three hundred and nine patients still wanted the surgery, 93 had already undergone surgery and 52 no longer wanted surgery. The last group was the oldest and had had the longest waiting time. Those still waiting had waited 451 days (minimum - maximum (standard deviation), 90 - 1 593 (228.5)), those that had had surgery 371 days (0 - 1 728 (296)) and those no longer interested 523 days (138 - 1 881 (260.9)). A total of 429 patients were present on the surgeons' list but not on the hospital list. They had had longer waiting times than those on the hospital list. CONCLUSION. The arthroplasty waiting list is inaccurate due to the existence of two concurrent lists and poor data management, particularly of current contact details. The unfairness of a wide range of waiting times was identified, with patients only on the surgeons' personal database disadvantaged. These deficiencies have prompted the introduction of a scoring-based prioritisation system incorporating clinical, radiographic and societal parameters, in an effort to improve fair and appropriate access to this high-cost care.South African Medical AssociationSAMJ: South African Medical Journal v.107 n.4 20172017-04-01journal articletext/htmlhttp://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0256-95742017000400019en
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Sudáfrica
countrycode ZA
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-za
tag revista
region África del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Kavalieratos,T
Nortje,M
Dunn,R N
spellingShingle Kavalieratos,T
Nortje,M
Dunn,R N
Hip and knee arthroplasty waiting list -how accurate and fair?
author_facet Kavalieratos,T
Nortje,M
Dunn,R N
author_sort Kavalieratos,T
title Hip and knee arthroplasty waiting list -how accurate and fair?
title_short Hip and knee arthroplasty waiting list -how accurate and fair?
title_full Hip and knee arthroplasty waiting list -how accurate and fair?
title_fullStr Hip and knee arthroplasty waiting list -how accurate and fair?
title_full_unstemmed Hip and knee arthroplasty waiting list -how accurate and fair?
title_sort hip and knee arthroplasty waiting list -how accurate and fair?
description BACKGROUND. Resource-intensive procedures require the use of patient waiting lists in an attempt to increase fairness of access to surgery and improve surgical efficiency. Total hip and knee arthroplasty has waiting lists in excess of years. OBJECTIVES. To analyse our tertiary state institution's hip and knee arthroplasty waiting list to assess its accuracy. METHODS. At Groote Schuur Hospital, our hospital-maintained database was compared with the surgeons' personally maintained database. Patients were then telephoned to confirm their contactability, and to discover whether they still wanted the procedure, or if they had already had it. Waiting duration and patient demographics were then calculated. RESULTS. Of the 655 patients on the hospital waiting list, only 454 were contactable. Three hundred and nine patients still wanted the surgery, 93 had already undergone surgery and 52 no longer wanted surgery. The last group was the oldest and had had the longest waiting time. Those still waiting had waited 451 days (minimum - maximum (standard deviation), 90 - 1 593 (228.5)), those that had had surgery 371 days (0 - 1 728 (296)) and those no longer interested 523 days (138 - 1 881 (260.9)). A total of 429 patients were present on the surgeons' list but not on the hospital list. They had had longer waiting times than those on the hospital list. CONCLUSION. The arthroplasty waiting list is inaccurate due to the existence of two concurrent lists and poor data management, particularly of current contact details. The unfairness of a wide range of waiting times was identified, with patients only on the surgeons' personal database disadvantaged. These deficiencies have prompted the introduction of a scoring-based prioritisation system incorporating clinical, radiographic and societal parameters, in an effort to improve fair and appropriate access to this high-cost care.
publisher South African Medical Association
publishDate 2017
url http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0256-95742017000400019
work_keys_str_mv AT kavalieratost hipandkneearthroplastywaitinglisthowaccurateandfair
AT nortjem hipandkneearthroplastywaitinglisthowaccurateandfair
AT dunnrn hipandkneearthroplastywaitinglisthowaccurateandfair
_version_ 1756005836639961088