Comparison of two text message (mHealth) campaigns for the Deaf: Contracted out v. conducted in-house

Cell phone-based health information (mobile health or mHealth) campaigns are an emerging technology. This evaluation focused on the aspect of cost of two health information campaigns, one on hypertension and one on pregnancy. Researchers could either contract out the technical components of the campaigns or attempt to run the campaigns themselves, in-house. The in-house campaigns cost an estimated ZAR13 548.72 v. the private provider quotes which ranged from ZAR27 542.97 to ZAR34 227.59. Running the campaigns in-house was more labour intensive and required more technical expertise, but had a reduced delivery failure rate (9.2% in-house v. 30.0% private provider). Running small to medium SMS (text message) campaigns for evaluative purposes proved advantageous over contracting out to private providers. Larger-scale evaluations and full-scale roll-out will require the services of private providers, but it is still essential that researchers actively engage with and monitor the technical aspects of these campaigns.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hacking,D, Lau,Y K, Haricharan,H J, Heap,M
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: South African Medical Association 2016
Online Access:http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0256-95742016000100018
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0256-95742016000100018
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0256-957420160001000182016-03-10Comparison of two text message (mHealth) campaigns for the Deaf: Contracted out v. conducted in-houseHacking,DLau,Y KHaricharan,H JHeap,MCell phone-based health information (mobile health or mHealth) campaigns are an emerging technology. This evaluation focused on the aspect of cost of two health information campaigns, one on hypertension and one on pregnancy. Researchers could either contract out the technical components of the campaigns or attempt to run the campaigns themselves, in-house. The in-house campaigns cost an estimated ZAR13 548.72 v. the private provider quotes which ranged from ZAR27 542.97 to ZAR34 227.59. Running the campaigns in-house was more labour intensive and required more technical expertise, but had a reduced delivery failure rate (9.2% in-house v. 30.0% private provider). Running small to medium SMS (text message) campaigns for evaluative purposes proved advantageous over contracting out to private providers. Larger-scale evaluations and full-scale roll-out will require the services of private providers, but it is still essential that researchers actively engage with and monitor the technical aspects of these campaigns.South African Medical AssociationSAMJ: South African Medical Journal v.106 n.1 20162016-01-01journal articletext/htmlhttp://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0256-95742016000100018en
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Sudáfrica
countrycode ZA
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-za
tag revista
region África del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Hacking,D
Lau,Y K
Haricharan,H J
Heap,M
spellingShingle Hacking,D
Lau,Y K
Haricharan,H J
Heap,M
Comparison of two text message (mHealth) campaigns for the Deaf: Contracted out v. conducted in-house
author_facet Hacking,D
Lau,Y K
Haricharan,H J
Heap,M
author_sort Hacking,D
title Comparison of two text message (mHealth) campaigns for the Deaf: Contracted out v. conducted in-house
title_short Comparison of two text message (mHealth) campaigns for the Deaf: Contracted out v. conducted in-house
title_full Comparison of two text message (mHealth) campaigns for the Deaf: Contracted out v. conducted in-house
title_fullStr Comparison of two text message (mHealth) campaigns for the Deaf: Contracted out v. conducted in-house
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two text message (mHealth) campaigns for the Deaf: Contracted out v. conducted in-house
title_sort comparison of two text message (mhealth) campaigns for the deaf: contracted out v. conducted in-house
description Cell phone-based health information (mobile health or mHealth) campaigns are an emerging technology. This evaluation focused on the aspect of cost of two health information campaigns, one on hypertension and one on pregnancy. Researchers could either contract out the technical components of the campaigns or attempt to run the campaigns themselves, in-house. The in-house campaigns cost an estimated ZAR13 548.72 v. the private provider quotes which ranged from ZAR27 542.97 to ZAR34 227.59. Running the campaigns in-house was more labour intensive and required more technical expertise, but had a reduced delivery failure rate (9.2% in-house v. 30.0% private provider). Running small to medium SMS (text message) campaigns for evaluative purposes proved advantageous over contracting out to private providers. Larger-scale evaluations and full-scale roll-out will require the services of private providers, but it is still essential that researchers actively engage with and monitor the technical aspects of these campaigns.
publisher South African Medical Association
publishDate 2016
url http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0256-95742016000100018
work_keys_str_mv AT hackingd comparisonoftwotextmessagemhealthcampaignsforthedeafcontractedoutvconductedinhouse
AT lauyk comparisonoftwotextmessagemhealthcampaignsforthedeafcontractedoutvconductedinhouse
AT haricharanhj comparisonoftwotextmessagemhealthcampaignsforthedeafcontractedoutvconductedinhouse
AT heapm comparisonoftwotextmessagemhealthcampaignsforthedeafcontractedoutvconductedinhouse
_version_ 1756005773798801408