Paediatric pancreatic trauma: a review of the literature and results of a multicentre survey on patient management
BACKGROUND: It is generally accepted that paediatric solid organ injury should be treated conservatively, unless there is haemodynamic instability unresponsive to resuscitation. When it comes to pancreatic trauma, there is much debate about appropriate management OBJECTIVES: To review the literature and determine how pancreatic trauma is managed in South African (SA) tertiary institutions and compares with international standards METHOD: A survey was emailed to 45 paediatric surgical consultants working in various paediatric surgical units in SA, Italy, England and Australia. The questionnaire comprised two scenarios of isolated pancreatic trauma (grade III), the main difference between them being the time interval between initial injury and presentation. In the first scenario, the patient presented 6 hours post injury whereas in the second scenario, the patient presented 6 days post initial injury. The survey enquired about diagnosis and subsequent work-up (including preferred imaging techniques), supportive management (including nutrition), the various options of definitive intervention and follow-up procedure RESULTS: There were 21 responders from four different countries. In the first scenario, 10 surgeons would operate, 8 would treat conservatively and 3 would perform an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatogram (ERCP) and stent. In the second scenario, 4 surgeons would operate, 13 would treat conservatively and 4 would undertake ERCP with stent. There was no difference in management between the SA surgeons and their international counterparts CONCLUSION: Management of blunt pancreatic trauma in SA is consistent with that reported in the literature. There is still controversy regarding the optimal management of pancreatic injury involving ducts. No absolute algorithm can be used to treat these patients. All patients should be treated individually and managed with an approach and techniques that are feasible
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Digital revista |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
South African Medical Association
2014
|
| Online Access: | http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0256-95742014001100038 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| id |
oai:scielo:S0256-95742014001100038 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| spelling |
oai:scielo:S0256-957420140011000382015-01-08Paediatric pancreatic trauma: a review of the literature and results of a multicentre survey on patient managementWestgarth-Taylor,CLoveland,JBACKGROUND: It is generally accepted that paediatric solid organ injury should be treated conservatively, unless there is haemodynamic instability unresponsive to resuscitation. When it comes to pancreatic trauma, there is much debate about appropriate management OBJECTIVES: To review the literature and determine how pancreatic trauma is managed in South African (SA) tertiary institutions and compares with international standards METHOD: A survey was emailed to 45 paediatric surgical consultants working in various paediatric surgical units in SA, Italy, England and Australia. The questionnaire comprised two scenarios of isolated pancreatic trauma (grade III), the main difference between them being the time interval between initial injury and presentation. In the first scenario, the patient presented 6 hours post injury whereas in the second scenario, the patient presented 6 days post initial injury. The survey enquired about diagnosis and subsequent work-up (including preferred imaging techniques), supportive management (including nutrition), the various options of definitive intervention and follow-up procedure RESULTS: There were 21 responders from four different countries. In the first scenario, 10 surgeons would operate, 8 would treat conservatively and 3 would perform an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatogram (ERCP) and stent. In the second scenario, 4 surgeons would operate, 13 would treat conservatively and 4 would undertake ERCP with stent. There was no difference in management between the SA surgeons and their international counterparts CONCLUSION: Management of blunt pancreatic trauma in SA is consistent with that reported in the literature. There is still controversy regarding the optimal management of pancreatic injury involving ducts. No absolute algorithm can be used to treat these patients. All patients should be treated individually and managed with an approach and techniques that are feasibleSouth African Medical AssociationSAMJ: South African Medical Journal v.104 n.11 20142014-11-01journal articletext/htmlhttp://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0256-95742014001100038en |
| institution |
SCIELO |
| collection |
OJS |
| country |
Sudáfrica |
| countrycode |
ZA |
| component |
Revista |
| access |
En linea |
| databasecode |
rev-scielo-za |
| tag |
revista |
| region |
África del Sur |
| libraryname |
SciELO |
| language |
English |
| format |
Digital |
| author |
Westgarth-Taylor,C Loveland,J |
| spellingShingle |
Westgarth-Taylor,C Loveland,J Paediatric pancreatic trauma: a review of the literature and results of a multicentre survey on patient management |
| author_facet |
Westgarth-Taylor,C Loveland,J |
| author_sort |
Westgarth-Taylor,C |
| title |
Paediatric pancreatic trauma: a review of the literature and results of a multicentre survey on patient management |
| title_short |
Paediatric pancreatic trauma: a review of the literature and results of a multicentre survey on patient management |
| title_full |
Paediatric pancreatic trauma: a review of the literature and results of a multicentre survey on patient management |
| title_fullStr |
Paediatric pancreatic trauma: a review of the literature and results of a multicentre survey on patient management |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Paediatric pancreatic trauma: a review of the literature and results of a multicentre survey on patient management |
| title_sort |
paediatric pancreatic trauma: a review of the literature and results of a multicentre survey on patient management |
| description |
BACKGROUND: It is generally accepted that paediatric solid organ injury should be treated conservatively, unless there is haemodynamic instability unresponsive to resuscitation. When it comes to pancreatic trauma, there is much debate about appropriate management OBJECTIVES: To review the literature and determine how pancreatic trauma is managed in South African (SA) tertiary institutions and compares with international standards METHOD: A survey was emailed to 45 paediatric surgical consultants working in various paediatric surgical units in SA, Italy, England and Australia. The questionnaire comprised two scenarios of isolated pancreatic trauma (grade III), the main difference between them being the time interval between initial injury and presentation. In the first scenario, the patient presented 6 hours post injury whereas in the second scenario, the patient presented 6 days post initial injury. The survey enquired about diagnosis and subsequent work-up (including preferred imaging techniques), supportive management (including nutrition), the various options of definitive intervention and follow-up procedure RESULTS: There were 21 responders from four different countries. In the first scenario, 10 surgeons would operate, 8 would treat conservatively and 3 would perform an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatogram (ERCP) and stent. In the second scenario, 4 surgeons would operate, 13 would treat conservatively and 4 would undertake ERCP with stent. There was no difference in management between the SA surgeons and their international counterparts CONCLUSION: Management of blunt pancreatic trauma in SA is consistent with that reported in the literature. There is still controversy regarding the optimal management of pancreatic injury involving ducts. No absolute algorithm can be used to treat these patients. All patients should be treated individually and managed with an approach and techniques that are feasible |
| publisher |
South African Medical Association |
| publishDate |
2014 |
| url |
http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0256-95742014001100038 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT westgarthtaylorc paediatricpancreatictraumaareviewoftheliteratureandresultsofamulticentresurveyonpatientmanagement AT lovelandj paediatricpancreatictraumaareviewoftheliteratureandresultsofamulticentresurveyonpatientmanagement |
| _version_ |
1756005714110709760 |