Disciplinary practices in schools and principles of alternatives to corporal punishment strategies

The aim of the study was to determine the consistency prevailing between the disciplinary practices in the schools and the principles of the Alternatives-to-Corporal Punishment strategy. The three main research questions that guided the study were to determine (1) How much variance of offences can be explained by disciplinary measures of alternative corporal punishment? (2) How well do the different measures of alternative corporal punishment predict offences? (3) Which is the best predictor of offences given a set of alternative measures? Twenty-nine schools participated in the survey andfive schools participated in the case study, so the achieved sample was 34 schools. From the 29 survey schools, one principal and one Life Orientation (LO) teacher participated. All in all 58 people participated. The results revealed that 66.60% of the variation in the offence of vandalism was explained by the predictors. When vandalism was predicted it was found that School identification (p = .693, p < .05), gender (p = -.180, p < .05), coordination of disciplinary committee (DC) meetings (p = .116, p < .05), communication with parents (p = 1.070, p < .05) and monitoring compliance to DC (p = .852, p < .05) were significant predictors. Responsibility, school location, experience as a principal, availability of policy, capacitation on discipline, counselling, recording of sanctions and monitoring implementation of sanctions were not significant predictors (varying p andp &gt; .05). The results reveal that there was no established consistency between the disciplinary practices in the schools and the principles of the alternatives-to-corporal punishment strategy.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Moyo,George, Khewu,Noncedo PD, Bayaga,Anass
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Education Association of South Africa (EASA) 2014
Online Access:http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0256-01002014000100012
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0256-01002014000100012
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0256-010020140001000122014-03-14Disciplinary practices in schools and principles of alternatives to corporal punishment strategiesMoyo,GeorgeKhewu,Noncedo PDBayaga,Anass alternative measures corporal punishment disciplinary offences practices sanctions The aim of the study was to determine the consistency prevailing between the disciplinary practices in the schools and the principles of the Alternatives-to-Corporal Punishment strategy. The three main research questions that guided the study were to determine (1) How much variance of offences can be explained by disciplinary measures of alternative corporal punishment? (2) How well do the different measures of alternative corporal punishment predict offences? (3) Which is the best predictor of offences given a set of alternative measures? Twenty-nine schools participated in the survey andfive schools participated in the case study, so the achieved sample was 34 schools. From the 29 survey schools, one principal and one Life Orientation (LO) teacher participated. All in all 58 people participated. The results revealed that 66.60% of the variation in the offence of vandalism was explained by the predictors. When vandalism was predicted it was found that School identification (p = .693, p < .05), gender (p = -.180, p < .05), coordination of disciplinary committee (DC) meetings (p = .116, p < .05), communication with parents (p = 1.070, p < .05) and monitoring compliance to DC (p = .852, p < .05) were significant predictors. Responsibility, school location, experience as a principal, availability of policy, capacitation on discipline, counselling, recording of sanctions and monitoring implementation of sanctions were not significant predictors (varying p andp &gt; .05). The results reveal that there was no established consistency between the disciplinary practices in the schools and the principles of the alternatives-to-corporal punishment strategy.Education Association of South Africa (EASA)South African Journal of Education v.34 n.1 20142014-01-01journal articletext/htmlhttp://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0256-01002014000100012en
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Sudáfrica
countrycode ZA
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-za
tag revista
region África del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Moyo,George
Khewu,Noncedo PD
Bayaga,Anass
spellingShingle Moyo,George
Khewu,Noncedo PD
Bayaga,Anass
Disciplinary practices in schools and principles of alternatives to corporal punishment strategies
author_facet Moyo,George
Khewu,Noncedo PD
Bayaga,Anass
author_sort Moyo,George
title Disciplinary practices in schools and principles of alternatives to corporal punishment strategies
title_short Disciplinary practices in schools and principles of alternatives to corporal punishment strategies
title_full Disciplinary practices in schools and principles of alternatives to corporal punishment strategies
title_fullStr Disciplinary practices in schools and principles of alternatives to corporal punishment strategies
title_full_unstemmed Disciplinary practices in schools and principles of alternatives to corporal punishment strategies
title_sort disciplinary practices in schools and principles of alternatives to corporal punishment strategies
description The aim of the study was to determine the consistency prevailing between the disciplinary practices in the schools and the principles of the Alternatives-to-Corporal Punishment strategy. The three main research questions that guided the study were to determine (1) How much variance of offences can be explained by disciplinary measures of alternative corporal punishment? (2) How well do the different measures of alternative corporal punishment predict offences? (3) Which is the best predictor of offences given a set of alternative measures? Twenty-nine schools participated in the survey andfive schools participated in the case study, so the achieved sample was 34 schools. From the 29 survey schools, one principal and one Life Orientation (LO) teacher participated. All in all 58 people participated. The results revealed that 66.60% of the variation in the offence of vandalism was explained by the predictors. When vandalism was predicted it was found that School identification (p = .693, p < .05), gender (p = -.180, p < .05), coordination of disciplinary committee (DC) meetings (p = .116, p < .05), communication with parents (p = 1.070, p < .05) and monitoring compliance to DC (p = .852, p < .05) were significant predictors. Responsibility, school location, experience as a principal, availability of policy, capacitation on discipline, counselling, recording of sanctions and monitoring implementation of sanctions were not significant predictors (varying p andp &gt; .05). The results reveal that there was no established consistency between the disciplinary practices in the schools and the principles of the alternatives-to-corporal punishment strategy.
publisher Education Association of South Africa (EASA)
publishDate 2014
url http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0256-01002014000100012
work_keys_str_mv AT moyogeorge disciplinarypracticesinschoolsandprinciplesofalternativestocorporalpunishmentstrategies
AT khewunoncedopd disciplinarypracticesinschoolsandprinciplesofalternativestocorporalpunishmentstrategies
AT bayagaanass disciplinarypracticesinschoolsandprinciplesofalternativestocorporalpunishmentstrategies
_version_ 1756005329092476928