Assessing gender stereotypes and sexual risk practices in men who have sex with men

Abstract Objective To analyze the construct validity and the internal consistency of the 12-item Bem Sex Role Inventory (BSRI-12) questionnaire and to study the association between gender stereotypes and sexual risk practices in men who have sex with men (MSM). Methods Cross-sectional study of 601 MSM who voluntarily and anonymously responded to an online survey on risk practices and gender stereotypes. The BSRI-12 was used to obtain gender stereotypes (masculine, feminine, undifferentiated and androgynous). For data analysis, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of the BSRI-12 and logistic regression were performed. Results Two main factors (Cronbach alpha 0.95 and 0.81) were obtained from the EFA. Using the androgynous roles as the reference category, we found lower odds of engaging in unprotected anal intercourse (UAI) among those who endorse feminine roles (OR: 0.53; 95%CI: 0.29-0.95). Endorsing masculine roles with alcohol consumption (OR: 1.92; 95%CI: 1.15-3.20) or the undifferentiated when not knowing the partner's serological status (OR: 1.55; 95%CI: 1.02-2.35) were associated with higher odds of UAI compared to those endorsing the androgynous roles. Undifferentiated participants also perform receptive UAI using poppers (OR: 2.19; 95%CI: 1.24-3.87), and insertive UAI not knowing the serological status of the sexual partner (OR: 1.69; 95%CI: 1.04-2.76) compared to androgynous participants. Conclusion The BSRI is a valid and consistent instrument for identifying gender stereotypes in MSM. A greater proportion of participants within the undifferentiated and the masculine category engage in risk practices with the influence of substance consumption and unawareness of their sexual partner's serological status. The information obtained may be useful to define intervention and prevention programs.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gasch Gallén,Ángel, Tomás Aznar,Concepción, Rubio Aranda,Encarnación
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedad Española de Salud Pública y Administración Sanitaria (SESPAS) 2018
Online Access:http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0213-91112018000600005
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0213-91112018000600005
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0213-911120180006000052020-12-03Assessing gender stereotypes and sexual risk practices in men who have sex with menGasch Gallén,ÁngelTomás Aznar,ConcepciónRubio Aranda,Encarnación Men who have sex with men Gender Sexual risk practices Masculinity Abstract Objective To analyze the construct validity and the internal consistency of the 12-item Bem Sex Role Inventory (BSRI-12) questionnaire and to study the association between gender stereotypes and sexual risk practices in men who have sex with men (MSM). Methods Cross-sectional study of 601 MSM who voluntarily and anonymously responded to an online survey on risk practices and gender stereotypes. The BSRI-12 was used to obtain gender stereotypes (masculine, feminine, undifferentiated and androgynous). For data analysis, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of the BSRI-12 and logistic regression were performed. Results Two main factors (Cronbach alpha 0.95 and 0.81) were obtained from the EFA. Using the androgynous roles as the reference category, we found lower odds of engaging in unprotected anal intercourse (UAI) among those who endorse feminine roles (OR: 0.53; 95%CI: 0.29-0.95). Endorsing masculine roles with alcohol consumption (OR: 1.92; 95%CI: 1.15-3.20) or the undifferentiated when not knowing the partner's serological status (OR: 1.55; 95%CI: 1.02-2.35) were associated with higher odds of UAI compared to those endorsing the androgynous roles. Undifferentiated participants also perform receptive UAI using poppers (OR: 2.19; 95%CI: 1.24-3.87), and insertive UAI not knowing the serological status of the sexual partner (OR: 1.69; 95%CI: 1.04-2.76) compared to androgynous participants. Conclusion The BSRI is a valid and consistent instrument for identifying gender stereotypes in MSM. A greater proportion of participants within the undifferentiated and the masculine category engage in risk practices with the influence of substance consumption and unawareness of their sexual partner's serological status. The information obtained may be useful to define intervention and prevention programs.Sociedad Española de Salud Pública y Administración Sanitaria (SESPAS)Gaceta Sanitaria v.32 n.6 20182018-12-01journal articletext/htmlhttp://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0213-91112018000600005en
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country España
countrycode ES
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-es
tag revista
region Europa del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Gasch Gallén,Ángel
Tomás Aznar,Concepción
Rubio Aranda,Encarnación
spellingShingle Gasch Gallén,Ángel
Tomás Aznar,Concepción
Rubio Aranda,Encarnación
Assessing gender stereotypes and sexual risk practices in men who have sex with men
author_facet Gasch Gallén,Ángel
Tomás Aznar,Concepción
Rubio Aranda,Encarnación
author_sort Gasch Gallén,Ángel
title Assessing gender stereotypes and sexual risk practices in men who have sex with men
title_short Assessing gender stereotypes and sexual risk practices in men who have sex with men
title_full Assessing gender stereotypes and sexual risk practices in men who have sex with men
title_fullStr Assessing gender stereotypes and sexual risk practices in men who have sex with men
title_full_unstemmed Assessing gender stereotypes and sexual risk practices in men who have sex with men
title_sort assessing gender stereotypes and sexual risk practices in men who have sex with men
description Abstract Objective To analyze the construct validity and the internal consistency of the 12-item Bem Sex Role Inventory (BSRI-12) questionnaire and to study the association between gender stereotypes and sexual risk practices in men who have sex with men (MSM). Methods Cross-sectional study of 601 MSM who voluntarily and anonymously responded to an online survey on risk practices and gender stereotypes. The BSRI-12 was used to obtain gender stereotypes (masculine, feminine, undifferentiated and androgynous). For data analysis, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of the BSRI-12 and logistic regression were performed. Results Two main factors (Cronbach alpha 0.95 and 0.81) were obtained from the EFA. Using the androgynous roles as the reference category, we found lower odds of engaging in unprotected anal intercourse (UAI) among those who endorse feminine roles (OR: 0.53; 95%CI: 0.29-0.95). Endorsing masculine roles with alcohol consumption (OR: 1.92; 95%CI: 1.15-3.20) or the undifferentiated when not knowing the partner's serological status (OR: 1.55; 95%CI: 1.02-2.35) were associated with higher odds of UAI compared to those endorsing the androgynous roles. Undifferentiated participants also perform receptive UAI using poppers (OR: 2.19; 95%CI: 1.24-3.87), and insertive UAI not knowing the serological status of the sexual partner (OR: 1.69; 95%CI: 1.04-2.76) compared to androgynous participants. Conclusion The BSRI is a valid and consistent instrument for identifying gender stereotypes in MSM. A greater proportion of participants within the undifferentiated and the masculine category engage in risk practices with the influence of substance consumption and unawareness of their sexual partner's serological status. The information obtained may be useful to define intervention and prevention programs.
publisher Sociedad Española de Salud Pública y Administración Sanitaria (SESPAS)
publishDate 2018
url http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0213-91112018000600005
work_keys_str_mv AT gaschgallenangel assessinggenderstereotypesandsexualriskpracticesinmenwhohavesexwithmen
AT tomasaznarconcepcion assessinggenderstereotypesandsexualriskpracticesinmenwhohavesexwithmen
AT rubioarandaencarnacion assessinggenderstereotypesandsexualriskpracticesinmenwhohavesexwithmen
_version_ 1755937875756580864