Revisiting the 'LowBirth Weight paradox' using a model-based definition

Introduction: Immigrant mothers in Spain have a lower risk of delivering Low BirthWeight (LBW) babies in comparison to Spaniards (LBW paradox). This study aimed at revisiting this finding by applying a model-based threshold as an alternative to the conventional definition of LBW. Methods: Vital information data from Madrid was used (2005-2006). LBW was defined in two ways (less than 2500 g and Wilcox's proposal). Logistic and linear regression models were run. Results: According to common definition of LBW (less than 2500 g) there is evidence to support the LBW paradox in Spain. Nevertheless, when an alternative model-based definition of LBW is used, the paradox is only clearly present in mothers from the rest of Southern America, suggesting a possible methodological bias effect. Conclusion: In the future, any examination of the existence of the LBW paradox should incorporate model-based definitions of LBW in order to avoid methodological bias.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Juárez,Sol, Ploubidis,George B., Clarke,Lynda
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedad Española de Salud Pública y Administración Sanitaria (SESPAS) 2014
Online Access:http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0213-91112014000200011
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0213-91112014000200011
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0213-911120140002000112014-07-18Revisiting the 'LowBirth Weight paradox' using a model-based definitionJuárez,SolPloubidis,George B.Clarke,Lynda Spain Low birthweight Birthweight Immigrant Migrant workers Introduction: Immigrant mothers in Spain have a lower risk of delivering Low BirthWeight (LBW) babies in comparison to Spaniards (LBW paradox). This study aimed at revisiting this finding by applying a model-based threshold as an alternative to the conventional definition of LBW. Methods: Vital information data from Madrid was used (2005-2006). LBW was defined in two ways (less than 2500 g and Wilcox's proposal). Logistic and linear regression models were run. Results: According to common definition of LBW (less than 2500 g) there is evidence to support the LBW paradox in Spain. Nevertheless, when an alternative model-based definition of LBW is used, the paradox is only clearly present in mothers from the rest of Southern America, suggesting a possible methodological bias effect. Conclusion: In the future, any examination of the existence of the LBW paradox should incorporate model-based definitions of LBW in order to avoid methodological bias.Sociedad Española de Salud Pública y Administración Sanitaria (SESPAS)Gaceta Sanitaria v.28 n.2 20142014-04-01journal articletext/htmlhttp://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0213-91112014000200011en
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country España
countrycode ES
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-es
tag revista
region Europa del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Juárez,Sol
Ploubidis,George B.
Clarke,Lynda
spellingShingle Juárez,Sol
Ploubidis,George B.
Clarke,Lynda
Revisiting the 'LowBirth Weight paradox' using a model-based definition
author_facet Juárez,Sol
Ploubidis,George B.
Clarke,Lynda
author_sort Juárez,Sol
title Revisiting the 'LowBirth Weight paradox' using a model-based definition
title_short Revisiting the 'LowBirth Weight paradox' using a model-based definition
title_full Revisiting the 'LowBirth Weight paradox' using a model-based definition
title_fullStr Revisiting the 'LowBirth Weight paradox' using a model-based definition
title_full_unstemmed Revisiting the 'LowBirth Weight paradox' using a model-based definition
title_sort revisiting the 'lowbirth weight paradox' using a model-based definition
description Introduction: Immigrant mothers in Spain have a lower risk of delivering Low BirthWeight (LBW) babies in comparison to Spaniards (LBW paradox). This study aimed at revisiting this finding by applying a model-based threshold as an alternative to the conventional definition of LBW. Methods: Vital information data from Madrid was used (2005-2006). LBW was defined in two ways (less than 2500 g and Wilcox's proposal). Logistic and linear regression models were run. Results: According to common definition of LBW (less than 2500 g) there is evidence to support the LBW paradox in Spain. Nevertheless, when an alternative model-based definition of LBW is used, the paradox is only clearly present in mothers from the rest of Southern America, suggesting a possible methodological bias effect. Conclusion: In the future, any examination of the existence of the LBW paradox should incorporate model-based definitions of LBW in order to avoid methodological bias.
publisher Sociedad Española de Salud Pública y Administración Sanitaria (SESPAS)
publishDate 2014
url http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0213-91112014000200011
work_keys_str_mv AT juarezsol revisitingthelowbirthweightparadoxusingamodelbaseddefinition
AT ploubidisgeorgeb revisitingthelowbirthweightparadoxusingamodelbaseddefinition
AT clarkelynda revisitingthelowbirthweightparadoxusingamodelbaseddefinition
_version_ 1755937800157396992