Dating violence (DV): a systematic meta-analysis review

Abstract This study summarizes the results of meta-analyses about risk and protective factors related to dating violence (DV). Fifteen studies were included from 1997 to 2018, N = 1784018. The results were classified according to ecological theory. The Zr’s were calculated for each factor and level of analysis, including the differences between victimization and perpetration effect sizes. Then, the Zr´s were transformed to r values. In accordance with the different levels of analysis, results showed that the effect sizes were greater for: (1) individual level: cigarette smoking, adolescent pregnancy (victimization) and sex (perpetration/victimization); (2) microsystem: peer sexual harassment, (victimization), peer DV, deviant peers and family violence (perpetration/ victimization); (3) exosystem: age (victimization) and violent neighborhoods (perpetration/ victimization), and (4) macrosystem: cultural minority and disadvantaged neighborhoods (perpetration / victimization). DV protective factors which had the lowest effect sizes were: parental and peer support; and highest effect sizes were found in the exo and macro levels, and then in the individual and micro levels. Furthermore, statistically significant differences between total effect sizes were found, with values being higher in the exosystem for victimization than for perpetration. Delimiting the most important risk and protective factors for DV has important implications for prevention and intervention.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gracia-Leiva,Marcela, Puente-Martínez,Alicia, Ubillos-Landa,Silvia, Páez-Rovira,Darío
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Universidad de Murcia 2019
Online Access:http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0212-97282019000200015
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0212-97282019000200015
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0212-972820190002000152020-10-28Dating violence (DV): a systematic meta-analysis reviewGracia-Leiva,MarcelaPuente-Martínez,AliciaUbillos-Landa,SilviaPáez-Rovira,Darío Dating violence Meta- review Social-ecological model Risk and protective factors Abstract This study summarizes the results of meta-analyses about risk and protective factors related to dating violence (DV). Fifteen studies were included from 1997 to 2018, N = 1784018. The results were classified according to ecological theory. The Zr’s were calculated for each factor and level of analysis, including the differences between victimization and perpetration effect sizes. Then, the Zr´s were transformed to r values. In accordance with the different levels of analysis, results showed that the effect sizes were greater for: (1) individual level: cigarette smoking, adolescent pregnancy (victimization) and sex (perpetration/victimization); (2) microsystem: peer sexual harassment, (victimization), peer DV, deviant peers and family violence (perpetration/ victimization); (3) exosystem: age (victimization) and violent neighborhoods (perpetration/ victimization), and (4) macrosystem: cultural minority and disadvantaged neighborhoods (perpetration / victimization). DV protective factors which had the lowest effect sizes were: parental and peer support; and highest effect sizes were found in the exo and macro levels, and then in the individual and micro levels. Furthermore, statistically significant differences between total effect sizes were found, with values being higher in the exosystem for victimization than for perpetration. Delimiting the most important risk and protective factors for DV has important implications for prevention and intervention.Universidad de MurciaAnales de Psicología v.35 n.2 20192019-01-01journal articletext/htmlhttp://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0212-97282019000200015en
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country España
countrycode ES
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-es
tag revista
region Europa del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Gracia-Leiva,Marcela
Puente-Martínez,Alicia
Ubillos-Landa,Silvia
Páez-Rovira,Darío
spellingShingle Gracia-Leiva,Marcela
Puente-Martínez,Alicia
Ubillos-Landa,Silvia
Páez-Rovira,Darío
Dating violence (DV): a systematic meta-analysis review
author_facet Gracia-Leiva,Marcela
Puente-Martínez,Alicia
Ubillos-Landa,Silvia
Páez-Rovira,Darío
author_sort Gracia-Leiva,Marcela
title Dating violence (DV): a systematic meta-analysis review
title_short Dating violence (DV): a systematic meta-analysis review
title_full Dating violence (DV): a systematic meta-analysis review
title_fullStr Dating violence (DV): a systematic meta-analysis review
title_full_unstemmed Dating violence (DV): a systematic meta-analysis review
title_sort dating violence (dv): a systematic meta-analysis review
description Abstract This study summarizes the results of meta-analyses about risk and protective factors related to dating violence (DV). Fifteen studies were included from 1997 to 2018, N = 1784018. The results were classified according to ecological theory. The Zr’s were calculated for each factor and level of analysis, including the differences between victimization and perpetration effect sizes. Then, the Zr´s were transformed to r values. In accordance with the different levels of analysis, results showed that the effect sizes were greater for: (1) individual level: cigarette smoking, adolescent pregnancy (victimization) and sex (perpetration/victimization); (2) microsystem: peer sexual harassment, (victimization), peer DV, deviant peers and family violence (perpetration/ victimization); (3) exosystem: age (victimization) and violent neighborhoods (perpetration/ victimization), and (4) macrosystem: cultural minority and disadvantaged neighborhoods (perpetration / victimization). DV protective factors which had the lowest effect sizes were: parental and peer support; and highest effect sizes were found in the exo and macro levels, and then in the individual and micro levels. Furthermore, statistically significant differences between total effect sizes were found, with values being higher in the exosystem for victimization than for perpetration. Delimiting the most important risk and protective factors for DV has important implications for prevention and intervention.
publisher Universidad de Murcia
publishDate 2019
url http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0212-97282019000200015
work_keys_str_mv AT gracialeivamarcela datingviolencedvasystematicmetaanalysisreview
AT puentemartinezalicia datingviolencedvasystematicmetaanalysisreview
AT ubilloslandasilvia datingviolencedvasystematicmetaanalysisreview
AT paezroviradario datingviolencedvasystematicmetaanalysisreview
_version_ 1755937449958178816