Psychometric and diagnostic properties of the Drug Abuse Screening Test (DAST): Comparing the DAST-20 vs. the DAST-10

Background The use of reliable and valid self-report questionnaires to identify drug use disorders (DUD) is a strategy that has shown usefulness for screening. One of the instruments more used for detection is the Drug Abuse Screening Test (DAST). The psychometric properties in the 20- and 10-item versions have been evaluated in other countries but in Mexico the psychometric and diagnostic properties of both versions are yet to be evaluated. Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate the psychometric and diagnostic properties of DAST-20 and -10. Method The sample included 565 participants receiving care in addiction residential centers. The DAST-20 was used as a measure to screen for DUD, and the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview 5.0 was used as "gold standard" for the DUD diagnosis. Cronbach's α and CFA were estimated in order to evaluate the psychometric properties. The Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to examine the diagnostic properties of each version. Results Both versions obtained a Cronbach's α ≥ .80, an optimal goodness of fit for the one factor model and Areas Under the Curve ≥ .90 (95% CI 87-93) for both versions. Discussion and conclusion DAST-20 and -10 versions are reliable and valid tools for DUD assessment and screening.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Villalobos-Gallegos,Luis, Pérez-López,Alejandro, Mendoza-Hassey,Rebeca, Graue-Moreno,Javier, Marín-Navarrete,Rodrigo
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz 2015
Online Access:http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0185-33252015000200002
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0185-33252015000200002
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0185-332520150002000022015-09-29Psychometric and diagnostic properties of the Drug Abuse Screening Test (DAST): Comparing the DAST-20 vs. the DAST-10Villalobos-Gallegos,LuisPérez-López,AlejandroMendoza-Hassey,RebecaGraue-Moreno,JavierMarín-Navarrete,Rodrigo Substance abuse detection substance-related disorders psychometrics ROC curve Background The use of reliable and valid self-report questionnaires to identify drug use disorders (DUD) is a strategy that has shown usefulness for screening. One of the instruments more used for detection is the Drug Abuse Screening Test (DAST). The psychometric properties in the 20- and 10-item versions have been evaluated in other countries but in Mexico the psychometric and diagnostic properties of both versions are yet to be evaluated. Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate the psychometric and diagnostic properties of DAST-20 and -10. Method The sample included 565 participants receiving care in addiction residential centers. The DAST-20 was used as a measure to screen for DUD, and the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview 5.0 was used as "gold standard" for the DUD diagnosis. Cronbach's α and CFA were estimated in order to evaluate the psychometric properties. The Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to examine the diagnostic properties of each version. Results Both versions obtained a Cronbach's α ≥ .80, an optimal goodness of fit for the one factor model and Areas Under the Curve ≥ .90 (95% CI 87-93) for both versions. Discussion and conclusion DAST-20 and -10 versions are reliable and valid tools for DUD assessment and screening.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessInstituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente MuñizSalud mental v.38 n.2 20152015-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0185-33252015000200002en
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country México
countrycode MX
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-mx
tag revista
region America del Norte
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Villalobos-Gallegos,Luis
Pérez-López,Alejandro
Mendoza-Hassey,Rebeca
Graue-Moreno,Javier
Marín-Navarrete,Rodrigo
spellingShingle Villalobos-Gallegos,Luis
Pérez-López,Alejandro
Mendoza-Hassey,Rebeca
Graue-Moreno,Javier
Marín-Navarrete,Rodrigo
Psychometric and diagnostic properties of the Drug Abuse Screening Test (DAST): Comparing the DAST-20 vs. the DAST-10
author_facet Villalobos-Gallegos,Luis
Pérez-López,Alejandro
Mendoza-Hassey,Rebeca
Graue-Moreno,Javier
Marín-Navarrete,Rodrigo
author_sort Villalobos-Gallegos,Luis
title Psychometric and diagnostic properties of the Drug Abuse Screening Test (DAST): Comparing the DAST-20 vs. the DAST-10
title_short Psychometric and diagnostic properties of the Drug Abuse Screening Test (DAST): Comparing the DAST-20 vs. the DAST-10
title_full Psychometric and diagnostic properties of the Drug Abuse Screening Test (DAST): Comparing the DAST-20 vs. the DAST-10
title_fullStr Psychometric and diagnostic properties of the Drug Abuse Screening Test (DAST): Comparing the DAST-20 vs. the DAST-10
title_full_unstemmed Psychometric and diagnostic properties of the Drug Abuse Screening Test (DAST): Comparing the DAST-20 vs. the DAST-10
title_sort psychometric and diagnostic properties of the drug abuse screening test (dast): comparing the dast-20 vs. the dast-10
description Background The use of reliable and valid self-report questionnaires to identify drug use disorders (DUD) is a strategy that has shown usefulness for screening. One of the instruments more used for detection is the Drug Abuse Screening Test (DAST). The psychometric properties in the 20- and 10-item versions have been evaluated in other countries but in Mexico the psychometric and diagnostic properties of both versions are yet to be evaluated. Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate the psychometric and diagnostic properties of DAST-20 and -10. Method The sample included 565 participants receiving care in addiction residential centers. The DAST-20 was used as a measure to screen for DUD, and the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview 5.0 was used as "gold standard" for the DUD diagnosis. Cronbach's α and CFA were estimated in order to evaluate the psychometric properties. The Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to examine the diagnostic properties of each version. Results Both versions obtained a Cronbach's α ≥ .80, an optimal goodness of fit for the one factor model and Areas Under the Curve ≥ .90 (95% CI 87-93) for both versions. Discussion and conclusion DAST-20 and -10 versions are reliable and valid tools for DUD assessment and screening.
publisher Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz
publishDate 2015
url http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0185-33252015000200002
work_keys_str_mv AT villalobosgallegosluis psychometricanddiagnosticpropertiesofthedrugabusescreeningtestdastcomparingthedast20vsthedast10
AT perezlopezalejandro psychometricanddiagnosticpropertiesofthedrugabusescreeningtestdastcomparingthedast20vsthedast10
AT mendozahasseyrebeca psychometricanddiagnosticpropertiesofthedrugabusescreeningtestdastcomparingthedast20vsthedast10
AT grauemorenojavier psychometricanddiagnosticpropertiesofthedrugabusescreeningtestdastcomparingthedast20vsthedast10
AT marinnavarreterodrigo psychometricanddiagnosticpropertiesofthedrugabusescreeningtestdastcomparingthedast20vsthedast10
_version_ 1756221961662365696