Bilateral simultaneous percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus staged approach: a critical analysis of complications and renal function
SUMMARY INTRODUCTION: Patients with bilateral kidney stones and burdened by large stones are challenging cases for endourologists. Simultaneous bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy (sbPCNL) is an option; however, it may be accompanied by important morbidity. An alternative is a staged PCNL, operating one side each time. Herein, we compare the impact of sbPCNL and staged PCNL on complication rates and renal function. METHODS: Patients who underwent sbPCNL or staged bilateral PCNL with a frame time of 6 months were searched in our prospectively collected kidney stone database. Groups were compared for age, gender, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities (classification by the American Society of Anesthesiology - ASA), stone size, Guy's score, stone-free status, renal function, blood loss, blood transfusion rate, complication rate, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients and 52 kidney units were enrolled. The mean operative time was 134.7 min. Only 11.3% of cases had complications, all of them minor (Clavien ≤ 2). Overall, the stone-free rate was 61.50%. Comparing the groups, there was a significantly longer operative time in the sbPCNL group (172.5 vs. 126.3 min; p=0.016), as well as a higher transfusion rate (12.5% vs. 5.6%; p=0.036). There was no statistically significant difference in creatinine levels between the groups. Regarding the stone-free rate, there was a significantly higher proportion of patients in the staged PCNL group (64.9% vs. 43.8%; p=0.012). CONCLUSION: sbPCNL is a safe procedure; however, when compared to staged procedures it has a higher transfusion and lower stone-free rate.
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Digital revista |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Associação Médica Brasileira
2020
|
Online Access: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302020001201696 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
oai:scielo:S0104-42302020001201696 |
---|---|
record_format |
ojs |
spelling |
oai:scielo:S0104-423020200012016962020-12-14Bilateral simultaneous percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus staged approach: a critical analysis of complications and renal functionTorricelli,Fabio C. M.Carvalho,Regina S.Marchini,Giovanni S.Danilovic,AlexandreVicentini,Fabio C.Batagello,Carlos A.Srougi,MiguelNahas,William C.Mazzucchi,Eduardo Complications Kidney Lithotripsy Urinary calculi SUMMARY INTRODUCTION: Patients with bilateral kidney stones and burdened by large stones are challenging cases for endourologists. Simultaneous bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy (sbPCNL) is an option; however, it may be accompanied by important morbidity. An alternative is a staged PCNL, operating one side each time. Herein, we compare the impact of sbPCNL and staged PCNL on complication rates and renal function. METHODS: Patients who underwent sbPCNL or staged bilateral PCNL with a frame time of 6 months were searched in our prospectively collected kidney stone database. Groups were compared for age, gender, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities (classification by the American Society of Anesthesiology - ASA), stone size, Guy's score, stone-free status, renal function, blood loss, blood transfusion rate, complication rate, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients and 52 kidney units were enrolled. The mean operative time was 134.7 min. Only 11.3% of cases had complications, all of them minor (Clavien ≤ 2). Overall, the stone-free rate was 61.50%. Comparing the groups, there was a significantly longer operative time in the sbPCNL group (172.5 vs. 126.3 min; p=0.016), as well as a higher transfusion rate (12.5% vs. 5.6%; p=0.036). There was no statistically significant difference in creatinine levels between the groups. Regarding the stone-free rate, there was a significantly higher proportion of patients in the staged PCNL group (64.9% vs. 43.8%; p=0.012). CONCLUSION: sbPCNL is a safe procedure; however, when compared to staged procedures it has a higher transfusion and lower stone-free rate.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAssociação Médica BrasileiraRevista da Associação Médica Brasileira v.66 n.12 20202020-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302020001201696en10.1590/1806-9282.66.12.1696 |
institution |
SCIELO |
collection |
OJS |
country |
Brasil |
countrycode |
BR |
component |
Revista |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
rev-scielo-br |
tag |
revista |
region |
America del Sur |
libraryname |
SciELO |
language |
English |
format |
Digital |
author |
Torricelli,Fabio C. M. Carvalho,Regina S. Marchini,Giovanni S. Danilovic,Alexandre Vicentini,Fabio C. Batagello,Carlos A. Srougi,Miguel Nahas,William C. Mazzucchi,Eduardo |
spellingShingle |
Torricelli,Fabio C. M. Carvalho,Regina S. Marchini,Giovanni S. Danilovic,Alexandre Vicentini,Fabio C. Batagello,Carlos A. Srougi,Miguel Nahas,William C. Mazzucchi,Eduardo Bilateral simultaneous percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus staged approach: a critical analysis of complications and renal function |
author_facet |
Torricelli,Fabio C. M. Carvalho,Regina S. Marchini,Giovanni S. Danilovic,Alexandre Vicentini,Fabio C. Batagello,Carlos A. Srougi,Miguel Nahas,William C. Mazzucchi,Eduardo |
author_sort |
Torricelli,Fabio C. M. |
title |
Bilateral simultaneous percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus staged approach: a critical analysis of complications and renal function |
title_short |
Bilateral simultaneous percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus staged approach: a critical analysis of complications and renal function |
title_full |
Bilateral simultaneous percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus staged approach: a critical analysis of complications and renal function |
title_fullStr |
Bilateral simultaneous percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus staged approach: a critical analysis of complications and renal function |
title_full_unstemmed |
Bilateral simultaneous percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus staged approach: a critical analysis of complications and renal function |
title_sort |
bilateral simultaneous percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus staged approach: a critical analysis of complications and renal function |
description |
SUMMARY INTRODUCTION: Patients with bilateral kidney stones and burdened by large stones are challenging cases for endourologists. Simultaneous bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy (sbPCNL) is an option; however, it may be accompanied by important morbidity. An alternative is a staged PCNL, operating one side each time. Herein, we compare the impact of sbPCNL and staged PCNL on complication rates and renal function. METHODS: Patients who underwent sbPCNL or staged bilateral PCNL with a frame time of 6 months were searched in our prospectively collected kidney stone database. Groups were compared for age, gender, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities (classification by the American Society of Anesthesiology - ASA), stone size, Guy's score, stone-free status, renal function, blood loss, blood transfusion rate, complication rate, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients and 52 kidney units were enrolled. The mean operative time was 134.7 min. Only 11.3% of cases had complications, all of them minor (Clavien ≤ 2). Overall, the stone-free rate was 61.50%. Comparing the groups, there was a significantly longer operative time in the sbPCNL group (172.5 vs. 126.3 min; p=0.016), as well as a higher transfusion rate (12.5% vs. 5.6%; p=0.036). There was no statistically significant difference in creatinine levels between the groups. Regarding the stone-free rate, there was a significantly higher proportion of patients in the staged PCNL group (64.9% vs. 43.8%; p=0.012). CONCLUSION: sbPCNL is a safe procedure; however, when compared to staged procedures it has a higher transfusion and lower stone-free rate. |
publisher |
Associação Médica Brasileira |
publishDate |
2020 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302020001201696 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT torricellifabiocm bilateralsimultaneouspercutaneousnephrolithotomyversusstagedapproachacriticalanalysisofcomplicationsandrenalfunction AT carvalhoreginas bilateralsimultaneouspercutaneousnephrolithotomyversusstagedapproachacriticalanalysisofcomplicationsandrenalfunction AT marchinigiovannis bilateralsimultaneouspercutaneousnephrolithotomyversusstagedapproachacriticalanalysisofcomplicationsandrenalfunction AT danilovicalexandre bilateralsimultaneouspercutaneousnephrolithotomyversusstagedapproachacriticalanalysisofcomplicationsandrenalfunction AT vicentinifabioc bilateralsimultaneouspercutaneousnephrolithotomyversusstagedapproachacriticalanalysisofcomplicationsandrenalfunction AT batagellocarlosa bilateralsimultaneouspercutaneousnephrolithotomyversusstagedapproachacriticalanalysisofcomplicationsandrenalfunction AT srougimiguel bilateralsimultaneouspercutaneousnephrolithotomyversusstagedapproachacriticalanalysisofcomplicationsandrenalfunction AT nahaswilliamc bilateralsimultaneouspercutaneousnephrolithotomyversusstagedapproachacriticalanalysisofcomplicationsandrenalfunction AT mazzucchieduardo bilateralsimultaneouspercutaneousnephrolithotomyversusstagedapproachacriticalanalysisofcomplicationsandrenalfunction |
_version_ |
1756410092593348608 |