Bilateral simultaneous percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus staged approach: a critical analysis of complications and renal function

SUMMARY INTRODUCTION: Patients with bilateral kidney stones and burdened by large stones are challenging cases for endourologists. Simultaneous bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy (sbPCNL) is an option; however, it may be accompanied by important morbidity. An alternative is a staged PCNL, operating one side each time. Herein, we compare the impact of sbPCNL and staged PCNL on complication rates and renal function. METHODS: Patients who underwent sbPCNL or staged bilateral PCNL with a frame time of 6 months were searched in our prospectively collected kidney stone database. Groups were compared for age, gender, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities (classification by the American Society of Anesthesiology - ASA), stone size, Guy's score, stone-free status, renal function, blood loss, blood transfusion rate, complication rate, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients and 52 kidney units were enrolled. The mean operative time was 134.7 min. Only 11.3% of cases had complications, all of them minor (Clavien ≤ 2). Overall, the stone-free rate was 61.50%. Comparing the groups, there was a significantly longer operative time in the sbPCNL group (172.5 vs. 126.3 min; p=0.016), as well as a higher transfusion rate (12.5% vs. 5.6%; p=0.036). There was no statistically significant difference in creatinine levels between the groups. Regarding the stone-free rate, there was a significantly higher proportion of patients in the staged PCNL group (64.9% vs. 43.8%; p=0.012). CONCLUSION: sbPCNL is a safe procedure; however, when compared to staged procedures it has a higher transfusion and lower stone-free rate.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Torricelli,Fabio C. M., Carvalho,Regina S., Marchini,Giovanni S., Danilovic,Alexandre, Vicentini,Fabio C., Batagello,Carlos A., Srougi,Miguel, Nahas,William C., Mazzucchi,Eduardo
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Associação Médica Brasileira 2020
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302020001201696
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0104-42302020001201696
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0104-423020200012016962020-12-14Bilateral simultaneous percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus staged approach: a critical analysis of complications and renal functionTorricelli,Fabio C. M.Carvalho,Regina S.Marchini,Giovanni S.Danilovic,AlexandreVicentini,Fabio C.Batagello,Carlos A.Srougi,MiguelNahas,William C.Mazzucchi,Eduardo Complications Kidney Lithotripsy Urinary calculi SUMMARY INTRODUCTION: Patients with bilateral kidney stones and burdened by large stones are challenging cases for endourologists. Simultaneous bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy (sbPCNL) is an option; however, it may be accompanied by important morbidity. An alternative is a staged PCNL, operating one side each time. Herein, we compare the impact of sbPCNL and staged PCNL on complication rates and renal function. METHODS: Patients who underwent sbPCNL or staged bilateral PCNL with a frame time of 6 months were searched in our prospectively collected kidney stone database. Groups were compared for age, gender, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities (classification by the American Society of Anesthesiology - ASA), stone size, Guy's score, stone-free status, renal function, blood loss, blood transfusion rate, complication rate, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients and 52 kidney units were enrolled. The mean operative time was 134.7 min. Only 11.3% of cases had complications, all of them minor (Clavien ≤ 2). Overall, the stone-free rate was 61.50%. Comparing the groups, there was a significantly longer operative time in the sbPCNL group (172.5 vs. 126.3 min; p=0.016), as well as a higher transfusion rate (12.5% vs. 5.6%; p=0.036). There was no statistically significant difference in creatinine levels between the groups. Regarding the stone-free rate, there was a significantly higher proportion of patients in the staged PCNL group (64.9% vs. 43.8%; p=0.012). CONCLUSION: sbPCNL is a safe procedure; however, when compared to staged procedures it has a higher transfusion and lower stone-free rate.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAssociação Médica BrasileiraRevista da Associação Médica Brasileira v.66 n.12 20202020-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302020001201696en10.1590/1806-9282.66.12.1696
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Torricelli,Fabio C. M.
Carvalho,Regina S.
Marchini,Giovanni S.
Danilovic,Alexandre
Vicentini,Fabio C.
Batagello,Carlos A.
Srougi,Miguel
Nahas,William C.
Mazzucchi,Eduardo
spellingShingle Torricelli,Fabio C. M.
Carvalho,Regina S.
Marchini,Giovanni S.
Danilovic,Alexandre
Vicentini,Fabio C.
Batagello,Carlos A.
Srougi,Miguel
Nahas,William C.
Mazzucchi,Eduardo
Bilateral simultaneous percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus staged approach: a critical analysis of complications and renal function
author_facet Torricelli,Fabio C. M.
Carvalho,Regina S.
Marchini,Giovanni S.
Danilovic,Alexandre
Vicentini,Fabio C.
Batagello,Carlos A.
Srougi,Miguel
Nahas,William C.
Mazzucchi,Eduardo
author_sort Torricelli,Fabio C. M.
title Bilateral simultaneous percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus staged approach: a critical analysis of complications and renal function
title_short Bilateral simultaneous percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus staged approach: a critical analysis of complications and renal function
title_full Bilateral simultaneous percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus staged approach: a critical analysis of complications and renal function
title_fullStr Bilateral simultaneous percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus staged approach: a critical analysis of complications and renal function
title_full_unstemmed Bilateral simultaneous percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus staged approach: a critical analysis of complications and renal function
title_sort bilateral simultaneous percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus staged approach: a critical analysis of complications and renal function
description SUMMARY INTRODUCTION: Patients with bilateral kidney stones and burdened by large stones are challenging cases for endourologists. Simultaneous bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy (sbPCNL) is an option; however, it may be accompanied by important morbidity. An alternative is a staged PCNL, operating one side each time. Herein, we compare the impact of sbPCNL and staged PCNL on complication rates and renal function. METHODS: Patients who underwent sbPCNL or staged bilateral PCNL with a frame time of 6 months were searched in our prospectively collected kidney stone database. Groups were compared for age, gender, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities (classification by the American Society of Anesthesiology - ASA), stone size, Guy's score, stone-free status, renal function, blood loss, blood transfusion rate, complication rate, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients and 52 kidney units were enrolled. The mean operative time was 134.7 min. Only 11.3% of cases had complications, all of them minor (Clavien ≤ 2). Overall, the stone-free rate was 61.50%. Comparing the groups, there was a significantly longer operative time in the sbPCNL group (172.5 vs. 126.3 min; p=0.016), as well as a higher transfusion rate (12.5% vs. 5.6%; p=0.036). There was no statistically significant difference in creatinine levels between the groups. Regarding the stone-free rate, there was a significantly higher proportion of patients in the staged PCNL group (64.9% vs. 43.8%; p=0.012). CONCLUSION: sbPCNL is a safe procedure; however, when compared to staged procedures it has a higher transfusion and lower stone-free rate.
publisher Associação Médica Brasileira
publishDate 2020
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302020001201696
work_keys_str_mv AT torricellifabiocm bilateralsimultaneouspercutaneousnephrolithotomyversusstagedapproachacriticalanalysisofcomplicationsandrenalfunction
AT carvalhoreginas bilateralsimultaneouspercutaneousnephrolithotomyversusstagedapproachacriticalanalysisofcomplicationsandrenalfunction
AT marchinigiovannis bilateralsimultaneouspercutaneousnephrolithotomyversusstagedapproachacriticalanalysisofcomplicationsandrenalfunction
AT danilovicalexandre bilateralsimultaneouspercutaneousnephrolithotomyversusstagedapproachacriticalanalysisofcomplicationsandrenalfunction
AT vicentinifabioc bilateralsimultaneouspercutaneousnephrolithotomyversusstagedapproachacriticalanalysisofcomplicationsandrenalfunction
AT batagellocarlosa bilateralsimultaneouspercutaneousnephrolithotomyversusstagedapproachacriticalanalysisofcomplicationsandrenalfunction
AT srougimiguel bilateralsimultaneouspercutaneousnephrolithotomyversusstagedapproachacriticalanalysisofcomplicationsandrenalfunction
AT nahaswilliamc bilateralsimultaneouspercutaneousnephrolithotomyversusstagedapproachacriticalanalysisofcomplicationsandrenalfunction
AT mazzucchieduardo bilateralsimultaneouspercutaneousnephrolithotomyversusstagedapproachacriticalanalysisofcomplicationsandrenalfunction
_version_ 1756410092593348608