Agreement between three perioperative risk scores

SUMMARY Objective: To evaluate the agreement between the three scores proposed by the II Guideline for Perioperative Evaluation of the Brazilian Society of Cardiology (SBC): the American College of Physicians algorithm (ACP), the Multicenter Study of Perioperative Evaluation (EMAPO) and Lee’s Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI). Method: Patients evaluated preoperatively for non-cardiac surgery by the anesthesiology service were classified as low, moderate or high-risk according to the 3 algorithms suggested by the II Guideline. To calculate the strength of agreement between the scores, the kappa agreement index was used. Results: Four hundred and one patients were included in the sample. Cohen’s kappa inter-rater agreement between scores was 0.270 (CI: 0.222 to 0.318), corresponding to a weak agreement. Analyzing in pairs, the best correlation was between EMAPO and ACP, with kappa = 0.327. Lee’s score was the one that classified more patients as low-risk: 98.3%, while EMAPO and ACP classified as low risk 91.3% and 92.5%, respectively. Conclusion: There is poor correlation among the risk scores proposed by the II Perioperative Evaluation Guideline of the SBC.

Bibliographic Details

Main Authors:	Feitosa-Filho,Gilson Soares, Loureiro,Bruna Melo Coelho, Nascimento,Jedson dos Santos
Format:	Digital revista
Language:	English
Published:	Associação Médica Brasileira 2016
Online Access:	http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302016000300276
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!