Validity and reliability of the Clinical Learning Environment, Supervision and Nurse Teacher (CLES+T), Turkish version

ABSTRACT Aim: A methodological type of study was conducted for the purpose of investigating the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Clinical Learning Environment, Supervision and Nurse Teacher (CLES+T) evaluation scale of the clinical learning environment of students, clinical nurses, and educators. Methods: Sample was comprised of 602 Turkish nursing students with clinical practice experience at the hospital. The CLES+T, developed by Saarikoski, was used for data collection. Language equivalency, internal consistency, item-total correlation, and structure validity were conducted within the scope of the validity and reliability study on the CLES +T scale. Results: It was determined that item-total correlations of four items were lower than 0.30, and those items were removed from the scale as a result of item analysis. The Cronbach’s alpha value of the scale was 0.93-0.99; item total point correlations of the scale varied between 0.45 and 0.66; six factors were identified in the CLES+T factor analysis study, with a total variance explained by these six factors of 64%. Conclusion: According to the findings of the research, the CLES+T Turkish version was found to be a valid and reliable scale, which can be used to evaluate satisfaction of nursing students with their clinical education in Turkey.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Atay,Selma, Kurt,Fatma Yılmaz, Aslan,Gülbahar Korkmaz, Saarikoski,Mikko, Yılmaz,Hilal, Ekinci,Volkan
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São Paulo 2018
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-11692018000100349
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0104-11692018000100349
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0104-116920180001003492018-09-06Validity and reliability of the Clinical Learning Environment, Supervision and Nurse Teacher (CLES+T), Turkish versionAtay,SelmaKurt,Fatma YılmazAslan,Gülbahar KorkmazSaarikoski,MikkoYılmaz,HilalEkinci,Volkan Nursing Student Clinical Environment Scale Satisfaction Validity Reliability ABSTRACT Aim: A methodological type of study was conducted for the purpose of investigating the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Clinical Learning Environment, Supervision and Nurse Teacher (CLES+T) evaluation scale of the clinical learning environment of students, clinical nurses, and educators. Methods: Sample was comprised of 602 Turkish nursing students with clinical practice experience at the hospital. The CLES+T, developed by Saarikoski, was used for data collection. Language equivalency, internal consistency, item-total correlation, and structure validity were conducted within the scope of the validity and reliability study on the CLES +T scale. Results: It was determined that item-total correlations of four items were lower than 0.30, and those items were removed from the scale as a result of item analysis. The Cronbach’s alpha value of the scale was 0.93-0.99; item total point correlations of the scale varied between 0.45 and 0.66; six factors were identified in the CLES+T factor analysis study, with a total variance explained by these six factors of 64%. Conclusion: According to the findings of the research, the CLES+T Turkish version was found to be a valid and reliable scale, which can be used to evaluate satisfaction of nursing students with their clinical education in Turkey.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEscola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São PauloRevista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem v.26 20182018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-11692018000100349en10.1590/1518-8345.2413.3037
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Atay,Selma
Kurt,Fatma Yılmaz
Aslan,Gülbahar Korkmaz
Saarikoski,Mikko
Yılmaz,Hilal
Ekinci,Volkan
spellingShingle Atay,Selma
Kurt,Fatma Yılmaz
Aslan,Gülbahar Korkmaz
Saarikoski,Mikko
Yılmaz,Hilal
Ekinci,Volkan
Validity and reliability of the Clinical Learning Environment, Supervision and Nurse Teacher (CLES+T), Turkish version
author_facet Atay,Selma
Kurt,Fatma Yılmaz
Aslan,Gülbahar Korkmaz
Saarikoski,Mikko
Yılmaz,Hilal
Ekinci,Volkan
author_sort Atay,Selma
title Validity and reliability of the Clinical Learning Environment, Supervision and Nurse Teacher (CLES+T), Turkish version
title_short Validity and reliability of the Clinical Learning Environment, Supervision and Nurse Teacher (CLES+T), Turkish version
title_full Validity and reliability of the Clinical Learning Environment, Supervision and Nurse Teacher (CLES+T), Turkish version
title_fullStr Validity and reliability of the Clinical Learning Environment, Supervision and Nurse Teacher (CLES+T), Turkish version
title_full_unstemmed Validity and reliability of the Clinical Learning Environment, Supervision and Nurse Teacher (CLES+T), Turkish version
title_sort validity and reliability of the clinical learning environment, supervision and nurse teacher (cles+t), turkish version
description ABSTRACT Aim: A methodological type of study was conducted for the purpose of investigating the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Clinical Learning Environment, Supervision and Nurse Teacher (CLES+T) evaluation scale of the clinical learning environment of students, clinical nurses, and educators. Methods: Sample was comprised of 602 Turkish nursing students with clinical practice experience at the hospital. The CLES+T, developed by Saarikoski, was used for data collection. Language equivalency, internal consistency, item-total correlation, and structure validity were conducted within the scope of the validity and reliability study on the CLES +T scale. Results: It was determined that item-total correlations of four items were lower than 0.30, and those items were removed from the scale as a result of item analysis. The Cronbach’s alpha value of the scale was 0.93-0.99; item total point correlations of the scale varied between 0.45 and 0.66; six factors were identified in the CLES+T factor analysis study, with a total variance explained by these six factors of 64%. Conclusion: According to the findings of the research, the CLES+T Turkish version was found to be a valid and reliable scale, which can be used to evaluate satisfaction of nursing students with their clinical education in Turkey.
publisher Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São Paulo
publishDate 2018
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-11692018000100349
work_keys_str_mv AT atayselma validityandreliabilityoftheclinicallearningenvironmentsupervisionandnurseteacherclestturkishversion
AT kurtfatmayılmaz validityandreliabilityoftheclinicallearningenvironmentsupervisionandnurseteacherclestturkishversion
AT aslangulbaharkorkmaz validityandreliabilityoftheclinicallearningenvironmentsupervisionandnurseteacherclestturkishversion
AT saarikoskimikko validityandreliabilityoftheclinicallearningenvironmentsupervisionandnurseteacherclestturkishversion
AT yılmazhilal validityandreliabilityoftheclinicallearningenvironmentsupervisionandnurseteacherclestturkishversion
AT ekincivolkan validityandreliabilityoftheclinicallearningenvironmentsupervisionandnurseteacherclestturkishversion
_version_ 1756408541776707584