Rasch Analysis of the Power as Knowing Participation in Change Tool - the Brazilian version

OBJECTIVES: the objective of this study was to evaluate the items contained in the Brazilian version of the Power as Knowing Participation in Change Tool (PKPCT). METHOD: investigation of the psychometric properties of the mentioned questionnaire through Rasch analysis. RESULTS: the data from 952 nursing assistants and 627 baccalaureate nurses were analyzed (average age 44.1 (SD=9.5); 13.0% men). The subscales Choices, Awareness, Freedom and Involvement were tested separately and presented unidimensionality; the categories of the responses given to the items were compiled from 7 to 3 levels and the items fit the model well, except for the following/leading item, in which the infit and outfit values were above 1.4; this item has also presented Differential Item Functioning (DIF) according to the participant's role. The reliability of the items was of 0.99 and the reliability of the participants ranged from 0.80 to 0.84 in the subscales. Items with extremely high levels of difficulty were not identified. CONCLUSIONS: the PKPCT should not be viewed as unidimensional, items with extremely high levels of difficulty in the scale need to be created and the differential functioning of some items has to be further investigated.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Guedes,Erika de Souza, Orozco-Vargas,Luiz Carlos, Turrini,Ruth Natália Teresa, Sousa,Regina Márcia Cardoso de, Santos,Mariana Alvina dos, Cruz,Diná de Almeida Lopes Monteiro da
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São Paulo 2013
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-11692013000700021
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0104-11692013000700021
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0104-116920130007000212013-03-01Rasch Analysis of the Power as Knowing Participation in Change Tool - the Brazilian versionGuedes,Erika de SouzaOrozco-Vargas,Luiz CarlosTurrini,Ruth Natália TeresaSousa,Regina Márcia Cardoso deSantos,Mariana Alvina dosCruz,Diná de Almeida Lopes Monteiro da Rasch Questionnaires PKPCT OBJECTIVES: the objective of this study was to evaluate the items contained in the Brazilian version of the Power as Knowing Participation in Change Tool (PKPCT). METHOD: investigation of the psychometric properties of the mentioned questionnaire through Rasch analysis. RESULTS: the data from 952 nursing assistants and 627 baccalaureate nurses were analyzed (average age 44.1 (SD=9.5); 13.0% men). The subscales Choices, Awareness, Freedom and Involvement were tested separately and presented unidimensionality; the categories of the responses given to the items were compiled from 7 to 3 levels and the items fit the model well, except for the following/leading item, in which the infit and outfit values were above 1.4; this item has also presented Differential Item Functioning (DIF) according to the participant's role. The reliability of the items was of 0.99 and the reliability of the participants ranged from 0.80 to 0.84 in the subscales. Items with extremely high levels of difficulty were not identified. CONCLUSIONS: the PKPCT should not be viewed as unidimensional, items with extremely high levels of difficulty in the scale need to be created and the differential functioning of some items has to be further investigated.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEscola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São PauloRevista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem v.21 n.spe 20132013-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-11692013000700021en10.1590/S0104-11692013000700021
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Guedes,Erika de Souza
Orozco-Vargas,Luiz Carlos
Turrini,Ruth Natália Teresa
Sousa,Regina Márcia Cardoso de
Santos,Mariana Alvina dos
Cruz,Diná de Almeida Lopes Monteiro da
spellingShingle Guedes,Erika de Souza
Orozco-Vargas,Luiz Carlos
Turrini,Ruth Natália Teresa
Sousa,Regina Márcia Cardoso de
Santos,Mariana Alvina dos
Cruz,Diná de Almeida Lopes Monteiro da
Rasch Analysis of the Power as Knowing Participation in Change Tool - the Brazilian version
author_facet Guedes,Erika de Souza
Orozco-Vargas,Luiz Carlos
Turrini,Ruth Natália Teresa
Sousa,Regina Márcia Cardoso de
Santos,Mariana Alvina dos
Cruz,Diná de Almeida Lopes Monteiro da
author_sort Guedes,Erika de Souza
title Rasch Analysis of the Power as Knowing Participation in Change Tool - the Brazilian version
title_short Rasch Analysis of the Power as Knowing Participation in Change Tool - the Brazilian version
title_full Rasch Analysis of the Power as Knowing Participation in Change Tool - the Brazilian version
title_fullStr Rasch Analysis of the Power as Knowing Participation in Change Tool - the Brazilian version
title_full_unstemmed Rasch Analysis of the Power as Knowing Participation in Change Tool - the Brazilian version
title_sort rasch analysis of the power as knowing participation in change tool - the brazilian version
description OBJECTIVES: the objective of this study was to evaluate the items contained in the Brazilian version of the Power as Knowing Participation in Change Tool (PKPCT). METHOD: investigation of the psychometric properties of the mentioned questionnaire through Rasch analysis. RESULTS: the data from 952 nursing assistants and 627 baccalaureate nurses were analyzed (average age 44.1 (SD=9.5); 13.0% men). The subscales Choices, Awareness, Freedom and Involvement were tested separately and presented unidimensionality; the categories of the responses given to the items were compiled from 7 to 3 levels and the items fit the model well, except for the following/leading item, in which the infit and outfit values were above 1.4; this item has also presented Differential Item Functioning (DIF) according to the participant's role. The reliability of the items was of 0.99 and the reliability of the participants ranged from 0.80 to 0.84 in the subscales. Items with extremely high levels of difficulty were not identified. CONCLUSIONS: the PKPCT should not be viewed as unidimensional, items with extremely high levels of difficulty in the scale need to be created and the differential functioning of some items has to be further investigated.
publisher Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São Paulo
publishDate 2013
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-11692013000700021
work_keys_str_mv AT guedeserikadesouza raschanalysisofthepowerasknowingparticipationinchangetoolthebrazilianversion
AT orozcovargasluizcarlos raschanalysisofthepowerasknowingparticipationinchangetoolthebrazilianversion
AT turriniruthnataliateresa raschanalysisofthepowerasknowingparticipationinchangetoolthebrazilianversion
AT sousareginamarciacardosode raschanalysisofthepowerasknowingparticipationinchangetoolthebrazilianversion
AT santosmarianaalvinados raschanalysisofthepowerasknowingparticipationinchangetoolthebrazilianversion
AT cruzdinadealmeidalopesmonteiroda raschanalysisofthepowerasknowingparticipationinchangetoolthebrazilianversion
_version_ 1756408447186763776