Kennard-Stone method outperforms the Random Sampling in the selection of calibration samples in SNPs and NIR data

ABSTRACT: Splitting the whole dataset into training and testing subsets is a crucial part of optimizing models. This study evaluated the influence of the choice of the training subset in the construction of predictive models, as well as on their validation. For this purpose we assessed the Kennard-Stone (KS) and the Random Sampling (RS) methods in near-infrared spectroscopy data (NIR) and marker data SNPs (Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms). It is worth noting that in SNPs data, there is no knowledge of reports in the literature regarding the use of the KS method. For the construction and validation of the models, the partial least squares (PLS) estimation method and the Bayesian Lasso (BLASSO) proved to be more efficient for NIR data and for marker data SNPs, respectively. The evaluation of the predictive capacity of the models obtained after the data partition occurred through the correlation between the predicted and the observed values, and the corresponding square root of the mean squared error of prediction. For both datasets, results indicated that the results from KS and RS methods differ statistically from each other by the F test (P-value < 0.01). The KS method showed to be more efficient than RS in practically all repetitions. Also, KS method has the advantage of being easy and fast to be applied and also to select the same samples, which provides excellent benefits in the following analyses.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ferreira,Roberta de Amorim, Teixeira,Gabriely, Peternelli,Luiz Alexandre
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Universidade Federal de Santa Maria 2022
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782022000500202
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0103-84782022000500202
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0103-847820220005002022021-10-27Kennard-Stone method outperforms the Random Sampling in the selection of calibration samples in SNPs and NIR dataFerreira,Roberta de AmorimTeixeira,GabrielyPeternelli,Luiz Alexandre data division PLS regression BLASSO chemometrics prediction power ABSTRACT: Splitting the whole dataset into training and testing subsets is a crucial part of optimizing models. This study evaluated the influence of the choice of the training subset in the construction of predictive models, as well as on their validation. For this purpose we assessed the Kennard-Stone (KS) and the Random Sampling (RS) methods in near-infrared spectroscopy data (NIR) and marker data SNPs (Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms). It is worth noting that in SNPs data, there is no knowledge of reports in the literature regarding the use of the KS method. For the construction and validation of the models, the partial least squares (PLS) estimation method and the Bayesian Lasso (BLASSO) proved to be more efficient for NIR data and for marker data SNPs, respectively. The evaluation of the predictive capacity of the models obtained after the data partition occurred through the correlation between the predicted and the observed values, and the corresponding square root of the mean squared error of prediction. For both datasets, results indicated that the results from KS and RS methods differ statistically from each other by the F test (P-value < 0.01). The KS method showed to be more efficient than RS in practically all repetitions. Also, KS method has the advantage of being easy and fast to be applied and also to select the same samples, which provides excellent benefits in the following analyses.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessUniversidade Federal de Santa MariaCiência Rural v.52 n.5 20222022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782022000500202en10.1590/0103-8478cr20201072
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Ferreira,Roberta de Amorim
Teixeira,Gabriely
Peternelli,Luiz Alexandre
spellingShingle Ferreira,Roberta de Amorim
Teixeira,Gabriely
Peternelli,Luiz Alexandre
Kennard-Stone method outperforms the Random Sampling in the selection of calibration samples in SNPs and NIR data
author_facet Ferreira,Roberta de Amorim
Teixeira,Gabriely
Peternelli,Luiz Alexandre
author_sort Ferreira,Roberta de Amorim
title Kennard-Stone method outperforms the Random Sampling in the selection of calibration samples in SNPs and NIR data
title_short Kennard-Stone method outperforms the Random Sampling in the selection of calibration samples in SNPs and NIR data
title_full Kennard-Stone method outperforms the Random Sampling in the selection of calibration samples in SNPs and NIR data
title_fullStr Kennard-Stone method outperforms the Random Sampling in the selection of calibration samples in SNPs and NIR data
title_full_unstemmed Kennard-Stone method outperforms the Random Sampling in the selection of calibration samples in SNPs and NIR data
title_sort kennard-stone method outperforms the random sampling in the selection of calibration samples in snps and nir data
description ABSTRACT: Splitting the whole dataset into training and testing subsets is a crucial part of optimizing models. This study evaluated the influence of the choice of the training subset in the construction of predictive models, as well as on their validation. For this purpose we assessed the Kennard-Stone (KS) and the Random Sampling (RS) methods in near-infrared spectroscopy data (NIR) and marker data SNPs (Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms). It is worth noting that in SNPs data, there is no knowledge of reports in the literature regarding the use of the KS method. For the construction and validation of the models, the partial least squares (PLS) estimation method and the Bayesian Lasso (BLASSO) proved to be more efficient for NIR data and for marker data SNPs, respectively. The evaluation of the predictive capacity of the models obtained after the data partition occurred through the correlation between the predicted and the observed values, and the corresponding square root of the mean squared error of prediction. For both datasets, results indicated that the results from KS and RS methods differ statistically from each other by the F test (P-value < 0.01). The KS method showed to be more efficient than RS in practically all repetitions. Also, KS method has the advantage of being easy and fast to be applied and also to select the same samples, which provides excellent benefits in the following analyses.
publisher Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
publishDate 2022
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782022000500202
work_keys_str_mv AT ferreirarobertadeamorim kennardstonemethodoutperformstherandomsamplingintheselectionofcalibrationsamplesinsnpsandnirdata
AT teixeiragabriely kennardstonemethodoutperformstherandomsamplingintheselectionofcalibrationsamplesinsnpsandnirdata
AT peternelliluizalexandre kennardstonemethodoutperformstherandomsamplingintheselectionofcalibrationsamplesinsnpsandnirdata
_version_ 1756406619365703680