Physicochemical Properties of a Bioceramic Repair Material - BioMTA

Abstract This study aimed to assess the physicochemical properties of a repair material in the Brazilian market, BioMTA, in comparison to other two materials currently in use (Biodentine and MTA Angelus). The initial setting time was evaluated using Gillmore needle. The pH was measured with a pH-meter after 24 h, 3, 7, 14 and 21 days. The radiopacity was determined using the equivalence in millimeters of aluminum (mm Al) from digitized occlusal radiographs. Solubility was determined after immersion in water for 7 days. The data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey tests (a=0.05). The BioMTA initial setting time (5.2 min) was lower than the other materials (p<0.05). All materials showed an alkaline pH at 21 days. At 24 h, BioMTA was the most alkaline material (p<0.05); and at 3, 7, 14 and 21 days there was no difference between BioMTA and Biodentine (p>0.05), both being more alkaline than MTA Angelus (p<0.05). The radiopacity of BioMTA (4.2 mm Al) was significantly higher compared to Biodentine (p<0.05) and lower than MTA Angelus (p<0.05). The solubility of the materials was -4.2%, -1.6% and 4.1% for BioMTA, MTA Angelus and Biodentine, respectively, with a significant difference between them (p<0.05). Therefore, it can be concluded that BioMTA displayed a shorter setting time, an alkaline pH, a higher radiopacity, and a gain in mass.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Coaguila-Llerena,Hernán, Ochoa-Rodriguez,Victor Manuel, Castro-Núñez,Gabriela Mariana, Faria,Gisele, Guerreiro-Tanomaru,Juliane Maria, Tanomaru-Filho,Mario
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto 2020
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402020000500511
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0103-64402020000500511
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0103-644020200005005112020-10-29Physicochemical Properties of a Bioceramic Repair Material - BioMTACoaguila-Llerena,HernánOchoa-Rodriguez,Victor ManuelCastro-Núñez,Gabriela MarianaFaria,GiseleGuerreiro-Tanomaru,Juliane MariaTanomaru-Filho,Mario biocompatible materials physical and chemical properties root canal treatment Abstract This study aimed to assess the physicochemical properties of a repair material in the Brazilian market, BioMTA, in comparison to other two materials currently in use (Biodentine and MTA Angelus). The initial setting time was evaluated using Gillmore needle. The pH was measured with a pH-meter after 24 h, 3, 7, 14 and 21 days. The radiopacity was determined using the equivalence in millimeters of aluminum (mm Al) from digitized occlusal radiographs. Solubility was determined after immersion in water for 7 days. The data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey tests (a=0.05). The BioMTA initial setting time (5.2 min) was lower than the other materials (p<0.05). All materials showed an alkaline pH at 21 days. At 24 h, BioMTA was the most alkaline material (p<0.05); and at 3, 7, 14 and 21 days there was no difference between BioMTA and Biodentine (p>0.05), both being more alkaline than MTA Angelus (p<0.05). The radiopacity of BioMTA (4.2 mm Al) was significantly higher compared to Biodentine (p<0.05) and lower than MTA Angelus (p<0.05). The solubility of the materials was -4.2%, -1.6% and 4.1% for BioMTA, MTA Angelus and Biodentine, respectively, with a significant difference between them (p<0.05). Therefore, it can be concluded that BioMTA displayed a shorter setting time, an alkaline pH, a higher radiopacity, and a gain in mass.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFundação Odontológica de Ribeirão PretoBrazilian Dental Journal v.31 n.5 20202020-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402020000500511en10.1590/0103-6440202003163
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Coaguila-Llerena,Hernán
Ochoa-Rodriguez,Victor Manuel
Castro-Núñez,Gabriela Mariana
Faria,Gisele
Guerreiro-Tanomaru,Juliane Maria
Tanomaru-Filho,Mario
spellingShingle Coaguila-Llerena,Hernán
Ochoa-Rodriguez,Victor Manuel
Castro-Núñez,Gabriela Mariana
Faria,Gisele
Guerreiro-Tanomaru,Juliane Maria
Tanomaru-Filho,Mario
Physicochemical Properties of a Bioceramic Repair Material - BioMTA
author_facet Coaguila-Llerena,Hernán
Ochoa-Rodriguez,Victor Manuel
Castro-Núñez,Gabriela Mariana
Faria,Gisele
Guerreiro-Tanomaru,Juliane Maria
Tanomaru-Filho,Mario
author_sort Coaguila-Llerena,Hernán
title Physicochemical Properties of a Bioceramic Repair Material - BioMTA
title_short Physicochemical Properties of a Bioceramic Repair Material - BioMTA
title_full Physicochemical Properties of a Bioceramic Repair Material - BioMTA
title_fullStr Physicochemical Properties of a Bioceramic Repair Material - BioMTA
title_full_unstemmed Physicochemical Properties of a Bioceramic Repair Material - BioMTA
title_sort physicochemical properties of a bioceramic repair material - biomta
description Abstract This study aimed to assess the physicochemical properties of a repair material in the Brazilian market, BioMTA, in comparison to other two materials currently in use (Biodentine and MTA Angelus). The initial setting time was evaluated using Gillmore needle. The pH was measured with a pH-meter after 24 h, 3, 7, 14 and 21 days. The radiopacity was determined using the equivalence in millimeters of aluminum (mm Al) from digitized occlusal radiographs. Solubility was determined after immersion in water for 7 days. The data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey tests (a=0.05). The BioMTA initial setting time (5.2 min) was lower than the other materials (p<0.05). All materials showed an alkaline pH at 21 days. At 24 h, BioMTA was the most alkaline material (p<0.05); and at 3, 7, 14 and 21 days there was no difference between BioMTA and Biodentine (p>0.05), both being more alkaline than MTA Angelus (p<0.05). The radiopacity of BioMTA (4.2 mm Al) was significantly higher compared to Biodentine (p<0.05) and lower than MTA Angelus (p<0.05). The solubility of the materials was -4.2%, -1.6% and 4.1% for BioMTA, MTA Angelus and Biodentine, respectively, with a significant difference between them (p<0.05). Therefore, it can be concluded that BioMTA displayed a shorter setting time, an alkaline pH, a higher radiopacity, and a gain in mass.
publisher Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto
publishDate 2020
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402020000500511
work_keys_str_mv AT coaguilallerenahernan physicochemicalpropertiesofabioceramicrepairmaterialbiomta
AT ochoarodriguezvictormanuel physicochemicalpropertiesofabioceramicrepairmaterialbiomta
AT castronunezgabrielamariana physicochemicalpropertiesofabioceramicrepairmaterialbiomta
AT fariagisele physicochemicalpropertiesofabioceramicrepairmaterialbiomta
AT guerreirotanomarujulianemaria physicochemicalpropertiesofabioceramicrepairmaterialbiomta
AT tanomarufilhomario physicochemicalpropertiesofabioceramicrepairmaterialbiomta
_version_ 1756404635787067392