Comparison of Face-To-Face Interview and Telephone Methods of Administration on the Ecohis Scores

Abstract The aim of this study was to compare the administration of the Brazilian version of Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (ECOHIS) questionnaire, applied by face-to-face and telephone format. A randomized sample of 76 parents/guardians of children up to 6 years old was selected in a Pediatric Dentistry Clinic of the Federal University of Santa Maria, Brazil. Patients were randomly selected for 2 different groups, according to administration sequence: F-T (Face-to-face-Telephone) and T-F (Telephone-Face-to-face). Two interviewers administered the ECOHIS questionnaire with 2 week interval between the methods. The reliability between sections of the different methods of administration was assessed by Cronbach's alpha and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). There were differences in means of the ECOHIS between face-to-face and telephone methods. However, the value Cronbach's alpha were between 0.94-0.96, and value ICC ranged from 0.91-0.93, proving to be acceptable values. The Bland-Altman plots confirmed the results of reliability tests, supporting the accuracy of the methods. Although there is a slight difference in the scores, the use of both mode of administration of the ECOHIS yields reliable data when single method is used from the beginning to the end of the study. The results provided evidence to use either Face-to-face or Telephone method of administration of the ECOHIS

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ortiz,Fernanda Ruffo, Santos,Mariana Dantas dos, Landenberger,Tatiana, Emmanuelli,Bruno, Agostini,Bernardo Antonio, Ardenghi,Thiago Machado
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto 2016
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402016000500613
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0103-64402016000500613
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0103-644020160005006132017-01-20Comparison of Face-To-Face Interview and Telephone Methods of Administration on the Ecohis ScoresOrtiz,Fernanda RuffoSantos,Mariana Dantas dosLandenberger,TatianaEmmanuelli,BrunoAgostini,Bernardo AntonioArdenghi,Thiago Machado administration method oral health-related quality of life face-to-face interview, telephone interview, children Abstract The aim of this study was to compare the administration of the Brazilian version of Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (ECOHIS) questionnaire, applied by face-to-face and telephone format. A randomized sample of 76 parents/guardians of children up to 6 years old was selected in a Pediatric Dentistry Clinic of the Federal University of Santa Maria, Brazil. Patients were randomly selected for 2 different groups, according to administration sequence: F-T (Face-to-face-Telephone) and T-F (Telephone-Face-to-face). Two interviewers administered the ECOHIS questionnaire with 2 week interval between the methods. The reliability between sections of the different methods of administration was assessed by Cronbach's alpha and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). There were differences in means of the ECOHIS between face-to-face and telephone methods. However, the value Cronbach's alpha were between 0.94-0.96, and value ICC ranged from 0.91-0.93, proving to be acceptable values. The Bland-Altman plots confirmed the results of reliability tests, supporting the accuracy of the methods. Although there is a slight difference in the scores, the use of both mode of administration of the ECOHIS yields reliable data when single method is used from the beginning to the end of the study. The results provided evidence to use either Face-to-face or Telephone method of administration of the ECOHISinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFundação Odontológica de Ribeirão PretoBrazilian Dental Journal v.27 n.5 20162016-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402016000500613en10.1590/0103-6440201601134
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Ortiz,Fernanda Ruffo
Santos,Mariana Dantas dos
Landenberger,Tatiana
Emmanuelli,Bruno
Agostini,Bernardo Antonio
Ardenghi,Thiago Machado
spellingShingle Ortiz,Fernanda Ruffo
Santos,Mariana Dantas dos
Landenberger,Tatiana
Emmanuelli,Bruno
Agostini,Bernardo Antonio
Ardenghi,Thiago Machado
Comparison of Face-To-Face Interview and Telephone Methods of Administration on the Ecohis Scores
author_facet Ortiz,Fernanda Ruffo
Santos,Mariana Dantas dos
Landenberger,Tatiana
Emmanuelli,Bruno
Agostini,Bernardo Antonio
Ardenghi,Thiago Machado
author_sort Ortiz,Fernanda Ruffo
title Comparison of Face-To-Face Interview and Telephone Methods of Administration on the Ecohis Scores
title_short Comparison of Face-To-Face Interview and Telephone Methods of Administration on the Ecohis Scores
title_full Comparison of Face-To-Face Interview and Telephone Methods of Administration on the Ecohis Scores
title_fullStr Comparison of Face-To-Face Interview and Telephone Methods of Administration on the Ecohis Scores
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Face-To-Face Interview and Telephone Methods of Administration on the Ecohis Scores
title_sort comparison of face-to-face interview and telephone methods of administration on the ecohis scores
description Abstract The aim of this study was to compare the administration of the Brazilian version of Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (ECOHIS) questionnaire, applied by face-to-face and telephone format. A randomized sample of 76 parents/guardians of children up to 6 years old was selected in a Pediatric Dentistry Clinic of the Federal University of Santa Maria, Brazil. Patients were randomly selected for 2 different groups, according to administration sequence: F-T (Face-to-face-Telephone) and T-F (Telephone-Face-to-face). Two interviewers administered the ECOHIS questionnaire with 2 week interval between the methods. The reliability between sections of the different methods of administration was assessed by Cronbach's alpha and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). There were differences in means of the ECOHIS between face-to-face and telephone methods. However, the value Cronbach's alpha were between 0.94-0.96, and value ICC ranged from 0.91-0.93, proving to be acceptable values. The Bland-Altman plots confirmed the results of reliability tests, supporting the accuracy of the methods. Although there is a slight difference in the scores, the use of both mode of administration of the ECOHIS yields reliable data when single method is used from the beginning to the end of the study. The results provided evidence to use either Face-to-face or Telephone method of administration of the ECOHIS
publisher Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto
publishDate 2016
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402016000500613
work_keys_str_mv AT ortizfernandaruffo comparisonoffacetofaceinterviewandtelephonemethodsofadministrationontheecohisscores
AT santosmarianadantasdos comparisonoffacetofaceinterviewandtelephonemethodsofadministrationontheecohisscores
AT landenbergertatiana comparisonoffacetofaceinterviewandtelephonemethodsofadministrationontheecohisscores
AT emmanuellibruno comparisonoffacetofaceinterviewandtelephonemethodsofadministrationontheecohisscores
AT agostinibernardoantonio comparisonoffacetofaceinterviewandtelephonemethodsofadministrationontheecohisscores
AT ardenghithiagomachado comparisonoffacetofaceinterviewandtelephonemethodsofadministrationontheecohisscores
_version_ 1756404582986022912